National government

Background Circular agriculture

Recycling plan Schouten certainly not watertight

June 18, 2019 - Redactie Boerenbusiness - 23 comments

The realization plan for the transition to circular agriculture was presented by Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) on Monday 17 June. For this project she worked together with a sounding board group of livestock farmers and arable farmers. However, this group was unable to reach a unanimous opinion. In addition, the reactions from society are not mild. 

The minister covers himself in advance by saying that every transition is a process of trial and error. Schouten mentions the ability to adapt to new circumstances characteristic of the Dutch agricultural sector, but she also indicates that much is demanded of farmers. "From fertilizer to animal manure, it takes quite a bit." The transition to other types of animal feed, for example through the use of new protein sources, will also be quite difficult.

It's time for experimentation
The realization plan works with 'Experimental areas'. Schouten sees this as a sign of trust. "The Netherlands is small, but has unique areas. The regional deals are in line with the strength of that region." The deals mentioned are not new: closing the cycles in the Achterhoek. That is, for example, a project that has been running for quite some time. She also mentions Food Valley, which is also a project that has been worked on for some time.

Schouten went in search of the frontrunners and existing initiatives. Farmers who do it differently are used as an example. In her plan she describes that farmers who have switched to circular agriculture earn a better living with it. The relevant question is what kind of business those entrepreneurs had before they made the switch. That question is not answered.

Learning from unproven concepts 
One of the farmers who got a place on the podium at the presentation is Geert van der Veer from 'Herenboeren'. This new initiative is presented as the ultimate connection between producer and consumer. Citizens hire a farmer to produce food for them. However, this concept has not yet proven its right to exist. The same goes for food forests. Those forests have hardly yielded any harvests yet. After all, it takes years before the trees are fully grown.

Food production chain
Schouten indicates that many links in the food production chain are involved in the plan. "It's ambitious, but we need to prepare the sector for the challenges ahead." She is in consultation with the supermarkets and reports that they do want to move and think along. The minister explains that the supermarkets are very interested in new concepts.

The 'price' aspect, however, remains undisclosed. According to Schouten, consumers should demand that products with a low environmental impact are on the shelves. The minister indicates that consumers have a lot of power. A pig farmer from the audience shouted that the entire realization plan is missing just one important player: the consumer, to which Schouten said: "If we set higher standards and still buy the cheapest meat, then we put the problem back to the farmer. I can feel it. as my assignment to take steps in that direction."

Fuss over more expensive food
On social media and in various newspapers Monday 17 June It is clear that consumers are not at all interested in the message 'environment' if a higher price has to be paid for it. Wierd Duk, journalist at De Telegraaf, wondered in which bubble Schouten lives and various other reactions were not lying. The actions taken by the minister to do something about the farmer's income are not reflected in the price side.

This mainly concerns the use of the funds for innovation, the use of the funds from the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) and the strengthening of the farmers' market power, making them stronger compared to the large purchasing organisations. In the autumn, the minister will open a subsidy scheme for innovation and investments in source-oriented emission reduction in stables. This plan simply comes too late for farmers in Brabant.

Minister Schouten is also in talks with the banks and various financiers for more favorable green financing. A revenue model is not yet available, but the minister is commissioning more research into this.

Healthy soil is the key
Healthy soil is also central to the plan. With healthy soil and natural pest protection, Minister Schouten hopes to be able to significantly reduce the share of crop protection products. The minister wants to map the soil quality in the Netherlands and is therefore working on unambiguous measurement methods that should be operational in 2021.

In September 2019, the minister will organize the 'National Soil Summit', which must be held annually. Schouten previously worked on a National Program for Agricultural Soils, which will become an important part of the path to circular agriculture: "My goal is that all agricultural soils in the Netherlands (1,8 million hectares) are sustainably managed by 2030 and that efforts for sustainable soil management are also valued by society."

Lack of communication
One of the biggest obstacles in the path to circular agriculture is abroad. The opponents of livestock farming cite export as the reason why circular agriculture will not work. A major problem, however, is the import of products that do not meet Dutch standards.

According to Schouten, it is important that the Netherlands leads the way with a low environmental impact, because other countries can produce more cheaply (for example through cheaper labour). It assumes that the consumer chooses that better product. Communication and information play an important role in this regard. It was mentioned several times during the meeting that this is not the case.

However, Minister Schouten's efforts are at odds with the treaty with the Mercosur countries: Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil and Paraguay. Negotiations have been going on for 20 years. This trade agreement is being concluded by Minister Sigrid Kaag (Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation) and she sees no point in 'protectionist measures'. In practice, this means that even more products are coming onto the Dutch market that do not meet the Dutch requirements, but are cheaper. It is a knife in the back for Schouten's ambitious plans.

Minister Schouten is one of the speakers at the National Economic Agricultural Congress of Boerenbusiness. Click here for the program and tickets.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
23 comments
johan June 18, 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/financieel/artikel/10882906/kringloopplan-schouten-determinen-niet-waterdicht]Kringloopplan Schouten definitely not waterproof[/url]
What planet does Schouten come from?
GMP was also once set up, Nl had to distinguish itself in the market in order to realize better prices, but the products never paid off because of this.
just saddled everyone with more paperwork and a higher cost price
hans June 18, 2019
The only way to promote circular agriculture is to tax (the fuel of) international transport.
Also the way to really better protect our Earth's environment.
Skirt June 18, 2019
The cycle becomes the exodus of agriculture.
neighbour June 18, 2019
Believe that we better sell our land to the Chinese so that they can see here in the Netherlands how they get their food, they all know so well!
Jp lapwing June 18, 2019
The acm a government agency must immediately be silenced. Horse and carriage minister Schouten does not say a word about this. The goose with golden eggs is expertly slaughtered by the government, the younger sector members are better off emigrating
Subscriber
Bildtboer June 18, 2019
I think it would be better that a mandatory percentage is sold organically in the shops, you create extra sales and growers remain free to become either conventional or organic.
DU June 18, 2019
Don't imagine this left-wing lady, the first thing that's going to happen to us is to reduce the fertilizer standards to supposedly make the soil healthier.
Finally, she will fight for better prices, and the public will not accept that.
Subscriber
quite rude June 19, 2019
Send that person to Mars or even further, all that bullshit about circular agriculture, Bah.
I already use manure in various shapes and sizes, mushroom compost, compost, betacal, straw goes back to a livestock farmer and the buyers and processors of our products don't deposit anything because everything!! is used or mistaken etc.etc.
Can that hat name another industry that works as efficiently as our agricultural sector?
And then she also listens to the consumer, the troll. She should ask them what their cycle is like if there is at all! No cycle at all, just consumption and waste of raw materials.
Schouten can better commit to a CO2 compensation to us!! we are the only ones that can capture CO2 in the soil!!!
Time and again we are put in a damn corner when you look at the bullshit about insects, glyphosate, other chemistry, drift, IPC, manure, Fertilizer, water, air, CO2, windmills, solar parks et cetera. etc.
Let the Chinese buy the lot, then I'll be off to a nicer country that treats their farmers decently!!!
Grower June 19, 2019
The Netherlands should not only have a country lawyer but also a country psychologist.. We are ruled by national madness.
Birgitta June 19, 2019
The last question is very tendentious.
Farmers are usually not satisfied with how things are going now, but prospects of how things could turn out anyway, that's a shame. With this concept, you can build on what some are already putting into practice (like the grumbler who commented here with his many types of compost) and try to amplify it. It is a combination of good regulation (for example, reducing cheap imports) and, on the other hand, less regulation as the recyclers are increasingly able to find each other.
entrepreneur June 20, 2019
farmers, connect with each other and ensure good prices. that is true sustainability. see fairebel in Belgium
Frog June 20, 2019
I advocate a thrift consumer, starting with the medicines! Only homeopathic remedies, if this doesn't work just let it die. Ooo what a nice cycle we get then, composting those corpses and then scattering them over our fields.
Fountains June 20, 2019
That's how it is and I'll take those bailiffs on the manure spreader with her delusional ideas
The Netherlands must lead the way and consumers must pay for it
The latter will never happen and our position in Europe is completely undermined by that stupid bitch.
That we take all this prestigious nonsense .
Jan June 22, 2019
@Fontane say, go and rinse your mouth
Subscriber
petepilot June 22, 2019
The Netherlands is becoming a city
there are no pigs and chickens and arable farming
young entrepreneurs look across the border and become a farmer there
it's always shit here
we are too close to each other

Subscriber
laapc June 22, 2019
The Herenboeren project as an example of how it should be done. Have we worked for this as agricultural entrepreneurs in all previous years? Hypermodern companies have been developed, are well mechanized, have worked hard to achieve a better production every year within the margins of the new government rules, so that the potatoes can still be in the shops for next to nothing. And meanwhile, so many other parts can be shipped as well, making us the world's second-largest export country? Do companies have to lose their sales in a farm shop or where consumers come to pick the beans themselves? Back to the mixed farm where manual labor and hard work still meant poverty? Agriculture has always changed over the years, but now we are going back to urban farming level.
Drikus June 22, 2019
It's not right. The consumer is against higher food prices, while the minister wants to tackle matters that she believes society requires. And if I want something more or better somewhere I will have to pay . It turns out that nothing at all is required from the consumer . It just doesn't have to smell and it doesn't have to be noise or landscape pollution. People see or experience this as a nuisance . And the rest is talked about a lot by the media and others who have their interests in this. And the consumer knows nothing and so just join the conversation . Because if media and important people say this, both will be . In my opinion, we and the consumer are being fooled. Now the consumer will experience that extra measures result in extra costs. But the product ultimately remains the same. And he or she has to pay more for the same product because, for example, protein in feed comes closer. But if the costs of the farmer rise and these products have to compete with supplies from other countries, you can forget about the higher price for the farmer. And the chance of more rules and species with an extra price, the chance of froude when trading these products.
Subscriber
self-employed there June 22, 2019
Perhaps you should look at the entire Herenboeren project through a different lens. If your farmers are also allowed to work on self-employed wages at a minimum of 16 euros per hour, many farmers will benefit considerably in net terms. 3000 hours * 16 euros is still a wage of 48.000 euros.
MoHamBro June 22, 2019
Hat, troll and bitch and "That's right and I'll take those sheriffs on the manure spreader with her delusional ideas", aha, is that the level at which people exchange ideas these days?
Peter Jansen June 22, 2019
The solution lies in compulsory (full) grazing. As an entrepreneur, we have little influence on policy, often as a result of colleague decisions. Grazing is an entrepreneur's choice. Cows in the meadow has the sympathy of society and also lowers the cost price.
Jan smith June 22, 2019
That's right, and then we ignore the LTO for a while. These drivers always have a well-known dealer in the neighbourhood/family that they stand up for. Complete grazing according to the definition that's the solution
Skirt June 22, 2019
You may still need a permit for grazing.
Subscriber
info June 22, 2019
A farmer is a free entrepreneur who MUST be good for his land and/or animals, will also have to continue to compete with imports from abroad and that wood, in that he knows best his choices of fertilization and care for his land, because we have every region in Ned. other soil qualities. He also does the same with the food and care of his animals, but there will also be a difference in consumers in society, so that organic and traditional food will be consumed. If this happens in the right proportions (market forces), the government will have to regulate much less because we will simply be destroyed by those regulatory interventions as entrepreneurs.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register