National government

News Politics

Schouten: 'We are definitely taking steps'

12 September 2019 - Kimberly Bakker - 58 comments

In the 'Animals in Livestock Farming' consultation, Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) promised to present further measures in December to reduce the number of barn fires. She also announced that the 'Remkes Committee', which conducts research into nitrogen emissions, will issue its first advice in the second half of September.

From the speaker round of the general consultation 'Animals in livestock farming', it appears that there is criticism of the progress of Schouten's agricultural vision (also known as a circular vision). "All the plans that I have heard so far are suspiciously similar to the implementation of 'Sustainable Livestock Farming'. We have given more orders as a result," said Tjeerd de Groot (D66).

Schouten states in a response that work is indeed being done on the transition to circular agriculture. "For example, the scheme for the reorganization of the pig farm can be approved at any time. This depends on Brussels. In addition, a system that has been built in 100 years cannot be deployed within 1 year."

'Less livestock around nature reserve'
Nitrogen emissions in the agricultural sector were a much-discussed theme last week due to De Groot's statements to reduce the pig and poultry stock as a solution. halve† According to Frank Futselaar (SP), it would be better to reduce the livestock around nature reserves. "That's much more effective in relation to the problem." He also wondered whether the ministry is already working on a plan to reduce nitrogen emissions, or whether it is waiting for the results of the Remkes committee.

In a response to Futselaar's comment, Schouten indicated that the committee will present the first part of the advice in the second half of September. "The cabinet will then provide a response (short and long-term solutions) to this advice as soon as possible. However, I have not received an interim report from the committee, which means that I cannot say anything further about this," said the minister.

'Minister must take concrete steps'
Another topic that has been discussed frequently in the past year is the barn fires† According to Esther Ouwehand (Party for the Animals), this has been discussed extensively in recent months, but no concrete steps have been taken yet. Futselaar also wonders why stables are not always equipped with facilities such as fire detectors. "This is now a voluntary measure, but maybe we should make it mandatory."

Helma Lodders (VVD) believes that Minister Schouten should come up with concrete measures. "The progress report already showed that 25% of barn fires are caused by vermin. We must give our entrepreneurs more opportunity to tackle this. I therefore ask the minister to come up with a concrete step before the end of the year." In addition, Dion Graus (PVV) argues for an annual MOT inspection on stables.

Minister Schouten states that he agrees with the above remarks and therefore undertakes to submit a letter in December in which further measures are mentioned (including the problem with rodents). "In addition, the research into the detection systems will be completed in December. We are also looking at various practical pilots with the so-called 'stable-safe system'."

'35 degree limit is too high'
Finally, Schouten made last week known to legally prohibit animal transport within the Netherlands at a temperature of 35 degrees Celsius or more. According to Ouwehand, however, that limit is much too high. "What is that temperature based on? Research shows that the animals already suffer from the heat at 27 degrees Celsius?" Futselaar also sees more in a ban from temperatures around 30 degrees Celsius.

However, Schouten does not intend to look at this again. "It is indeed true that there can also be heat stress below 35 degrees, but this is the level at which we will enforce. In most countries, the European transport regulation applies to transports that are longer than 8 hours. In Brussels, the discussion is already underway. to ban transports from 30 degrees. I support that, because I think it makes sense for longer transports."

Minister Schouten is one of the speakers at the National Economic Agricultural Congress of Boerenbusiness. Click here for the program and tickets.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Kimberly Baker

Kimberly Bakker is an all-round editor at Boerenbusiness. She also has an eye for the social media channels of Boerenbusiness.
Comments
58 comments
Skirt 12 September 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/financieel/artikel/10883983/schouten-we-zet-wel-delijk-stappen]Schouten: 'We are definitely taking steps'[/url]
In fact, no dog even cares what comes out of Schouten's tube, in practice nothing comes of it and it is mainly negative dredging that hardly any farmer will benefit from in the short and long term. If we had had this totally rudderless and negative policy in the 50s, nothing would have come of modern NL agriculture.
hans 12 September 2019
Kjol, you cannot and should not compare the agriculture of that time with that of today.

Then agriculture was a first necessity to feed the own population, just as when industry was a necessity to provide the own population with basic necessities such as clothing and housing.

Then came the time when the government wanted to bring welfare to the population, and the costs of this were borne by, among other things, the export of foodstuffs and industrial products.

Then came natural gas, unlimited money for the government, unlimited wealth growth, unlimited imports, work became a dirty word.

Then came the EU. And the euros. Unlimited possibilities by abusing poor people Within the EU through relocation of production sites, internationally through French and English military repression.
Corporations became multinationals, given complete freedom to kill small businesses and pass on their profits tax-free to their few large shareholders.

And the population is mellow, lost, ill-educated, and soon their big mouth will only cost them their head.
socks 12 September 2019
Hans I share your opinion and the conclusion is everything is just fake and divert attention. The real reason is Holland is bankrupt even worse than Greece and Italy, but no one should know that.
has 12 September 2019
less in nature. therefore fewer cars, industry, housing and air traffic in nature.
burnt 12 September 2019
Nothing constructive comes out of your pen; come up with future-proof proposals. There is too much of the same on the market. This is how we price ourselves out of the market. Our costs are too high. Differentiate, away from the same, the Chinese and Americans can do that too. We farmers must become entrepreneurs. Apart from those stifling agricultural organizations
burnt 12 September 2019
we have little to say as farmers it is the power and regulatory pressure that destroy us alone or with 10 farmers you can not do anything . wake up we are being pushed into the corner from all sides and hard too . do you come up with plans then, everything we have undertaken in life will be nipped in the bud or punished later fun!
Act 13 September 2019
What I notice:
A few months ago, about a day and a half in the news was devoted to the years-long (and still ongoing) emission of the very harmful and very large quantities3 lag gas by chemical giant Chemelot. All politicians and media were silent about it after a day. Difference in interests... Jobs... If father Netherlands continues to honk the horn, we(chemelot) will go to another place somewhere in the world... job gone...
As a sector, we are too easy to catch (without evoking a Calimero feeling). Arable farming, cattle farming, intensive livestock farming glass/horticulture. All agricultural. All different with different interests that are often (even mutually) played off against each other.
Skirt 13 September 2019
How much more evidence do you want....politics is sacrificing agriculture. Remkes's plans are on the table.
peter 13 September 2019
All food production must come from the low-wage countries, the large multinationals benefit enormously from this and also the politicians otherwise they would impose levies to protect the internal market! For politics people who are farmers and all who earn a living from this are rats and we don't want them here in Hollandia anymore !! The state in Hollandia all want drugs so that the people masses of people high and stupid (on the drip) continues to bring drug criminals back under the guidance of minister Grapenhaus and the whole cabinet is behind this!! Bringing Syrian terrorists back to the Netherlands and the Netherlands also pays for this. But there is no place for people who work honestly and pay taxes!!!!!
peter 13 September 2019
and if Wilder calls fewer Moroccans, because he knows that they are educating children to hate and kill infidels in their Salafist schools throughout the Netherlands, he must appear in court. But if Mr Tjeerd de Groot of D66 calls for less animals to clean up half of the (farming population) this is the most normal thing in the world! Farmers who work hard every day and who have helped build the land are put away as scum.
arable farmer 13 September 2019
Agriculture.....
Now be honest Minister Schouten and say livestock farming out loud!!!

Because of the stories in the media, the entire sector is lumped together.
While I think 90% of the problems are livestock related.
Dead ryegrass jungles, manure problem, animal transports, fiprolnil, barn fires, PAS

I would like a minister who clearly indicates where the problem lies, so I don't have to explain the story again one birthday.

Because I don't sit on a birthday to talk about my work.
pig farmer 13 September 2019
If one really wants to remediate, those who want to stop are given the opportunity to sell their nitrogen quota to the industry, which is willing to pay a lot of money for this.
Because the announced warm remediation can be called very lukewarm instead of warm because for many it will be too little than to be able to remediate.
Exchanging pig rights / phosphate rights had been a good system but was stopped by the large farmers' administrators and that may now be the case again that they only think of themselves at the expense of an increasingly large group that does want to remediate (warmly).
You have to be in charge of your own quota and what you want with it
Joost 13 September 2019
Oh dear there we have that Peter again, that's the guy who even wants to shoot a NAK controller and then quarter it when he drives a few hundred meters over a neighbor's wasteland. Power back to the farmers who will decide for themselves who they tolerate and who don't, all with a sword so you can clean up the civil service immediately when you come across them. Just like all the left-wing, green, intelligent, young, older and other idiots who don't get it either.
Towards a peasant society. Peter for president. yeah.
peter 13 September 2019
@Joost I'm glad you're starting to get it!! History repeats itself. In the time of Napoleon all officials to the gelatin scissors and in the time of Hitler to clean up everything that opposes the regime I am indeed the same. If Germany had won the world war 75 years ago, we would have been 75 Europe 1 years ago, but the Americans and the English did not want this at all costs. and what do we see 75 years later what the English are doing with Europe?? (leading Brexit etc.) and the mess that America makes with import duties?? I have read the book Meinkampf you should also do it!! Then you knew that Hitler couldn't stand injustice like I did. A real guy doesn't become a controller!!!!!
peter 13 September 2019
I have still forgotten what the Dutch state did with their slaves in India and when they enslaved everyone with the sword in the golden age, sad of such a constitutional state, I still have to respect this. If all people wanted to WORK again, all problems would be solved!!!

Amen and have a nice weekend Jostie
John 14 September 2019
Should we as agriculture also look for the purchase of a large company outside our sector with which we can protect? And then use it as change to move company x if this rambling continues..
nn 15 September 2019
If an outsider reads all this nonsense, would he or she think this is about a reasonable group of people (entrepreneurs) who know what they want.
A reasonable group that thinks in solutions?
arable farmer 15 September 2019
pig farmer.
Tell me 1 sector in the Netherlands that gets money to stop..........
I mean really read what you're writing now.
Ridiculous, just the thought.
If you want to stop, sell your animals, machines and company, redeem the accumulated FOR and you're done.

south farmer 15 September 2019
Farmer wrote:
Agriculture.....
Now be honest Minister Schouten and say livestock farming out loud!!!

Because of the stories in the media, the entire sector is lumped together.
While I think 90% of the problems are livestock related.
Dead ryegrass jungles, manure problem, animal transports, fiprolnil, barn fires, PAS

I would like a minister who clearly indicates where the problem lies, so I don't have to explain the story again one birthday.

Because I don't sit on a birthday to talk about my work.
You forget crop protection. Also a livestock business? You can count on your fingers that nothing is left of our pallet of resources. Organic farming therefore and without foreign input because hard-working foreign people are undesirable here. So it's all our turn.
peter 15 September 2019
@ arable farmer I am a dairy farmer myself and I think it's too crazy for words all the so-called investments that the livestock industry is REQUIRED to meet their stables what you hardly have on your arable land maybe a few 10k but not 100k to a million! from whom do you get your manure to fertilize the land chemical factory or animal poop. or will it be people's shit full of chemical drug waste on your land in the future? I would like it if we, as a sector, would act together.
Drent 15 September 2019
don't worry, we also have to make substantial investments in arable farming to comply with the rules, eg our 2-year-old spraying machine must now be replaced or adapted to meet the new regulations, costs more than 40 mille. And many substances are banned, which means that we have to use new, more expensive substances and we can go on like this for a while. So don't say it's okay with us...
Subscriber
Skirt 15 September 2019
Adjusting your sprayer costs next to nothing, just unscrew the caps underneath and you meet the drift reduction.
Drent 16 September 2019
unfortunately kjol, you are not well informed, to be allowed to spray certain products you are obliged to work with a certain reduction which you only achieve with wing sprayer etc. Your conclusion other caps underneath does not work because you have to put the caps at 25 cm so put new pipes etc on it. If only it were that simple with a few other caps solved...
peter 16 September 2019
@akkerboer, who processes the rest products of arable farming and fruit cultivation: potato chips, apple pulp, beet pulp, citrus pulp, carrot chips, etc. etc. I call on all arable farmers to become a FAMILY and work together to pull!!
peta 16 September 2019
@ arable farmer: Shame on you deeply. I am also a plant grower. And I see how politicians are destroying the entire sector, including plant growers, on so-called environmental grounds. The entire sector is being blamed for everything, especially what causes the large mass of voting livestock in the cities. If you think you can escape that, forget it. And your explanation of how simple it is to quit says it all to me. Strange entrepreneurial spirit.
Once again, you are deeply SHAME! You inflict unnecessary damage on your colleagues.
Skirt 16 September 2019
I would just take it easy with wasting a lot of money by completely converting your sprayer, first a year wider cultivation-free zone and most resources can be used.
Subscriber
Hannes 16 September 2019
If you read all the comments on this forum then you know exactly why we are all in the position we are in now, arable farming versus livestock farming, contract growers versus free growers, sand farmers versus clay farmers, consumption growers versus seed potato growers and so on. I think it's about time we started talking with one voice, do we want to keep something of a farmer's future in this backward Netherlands
Jeroen 16 September 2019
less animals, more farmers
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Opinions Krijn J. Poppe

Governance is difficult due to our individualistic culture

News Speech from the Throne

'Food security important in uncertain world'

Opinions Kasper Walter

How our policymakers are faltering in energy transition

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register