Shutterstock

News Politics

Schouten tackles abuses in slaughterhouses

13 September 2019 - Kimberly Bakker - 8 comments

The research that Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) had carried out into the abuses in small and medium-sized slaughterhouses in the Northern Netherlands, shows that action is not being taken on an equal footing. "The report provides a penetrating picture and shows the seriousness of the problem," writes Schouten.

The study, which was conducted by research agency 2Solve, shows that the Dutch Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority (NVWA) does not assess the slaughterworthiness and transportworthiness of small and medium-sized slaughterhouses in the north of the Netherlands in the same way. In addition, insufficient enforcement action is taken when necessary. According to the minister, most of the problems are due to a staff shortage at the NVWA.

In addition to writing the researchers that supervising veterinarians handle the standards for transportworthiness and slaughterworthiness differently. "There are not only differences of interpretation about these standards, but also huge differences in the willingness to uphold these standards," the report said. It is also shown that the way in which the NVWA handles reports and signals about abuses in the sector at various levels is insufficient; for example, some reports are not handled properly.

'Serious matter'
Minister Schouten calls the findings of the investigation serious. "This report makes clear what is lacking. Supervision of the links of the production chain that are ultimately supplied to these slaughterhouses and the supervision of the export of these animals must be better," she reports in the Letter to Parliament from Thursday evening September 12. "That is why I am going to talk to the NVWA about how it will aim for consistent enforcement."

Schouten will also implement further measures to improve inspection and enforcement at the small and medium-sized slaughterhouses in the north of the Netherlands. "Strong measures will be taken against employees who systematically evade their responsibilities," said the minister. From this moment on, duo inspections will also be carried out by employees of the 'Inspection' and 'Enforcement' directorates, and a joint enforcement process will be carried out for exports from a number of collection centers.

"The NVWA has also indicated that it wants to significantly shorten the lead time for imposing sanctions," writes Schouten. "It is therefore imperative that the veterinarians have sufficient time to report findings immediately and concretely." This is also the reason that the NVWA is already actively recruiting the number of veterinarians.

'Livestock farmers also play a role'
Schouten emphasizes that the implementation of measures within the NVWA is not the only solution. "A behavioral change must also take place among various livestock farmers," she writes. "For example, I find it unacceptable that there are farmers and traders who (for economic gain) provide wrecked animals with paracetamol and then put them on transport." 

Schouten also cranks up the subject camera surveillance back on. She wants the small and medium-sized slaughterhouses to install cameras, among other things to support the supervising veterinarians in their work. She also mentions that camera surveillance will be introduced at the expense of the slaughterhouse. Those who do not want to or do not cooperate receive permanent supervision from an inspection veterinarian. "That costs money and the sector will pay for itself."

Minister Schouten is one of the speakers at the National Economic Agricultural Congress of Boerenbusiness. Click here for the program and tickets.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Kimberly Baker

Kimberly Bakker is an all-round editor at Boerenbusiness. She also has an eye for the social media channels of Boerenbusiness.
Comments
8 comments
has 13 September 2019
staff too short and duo control. they can't get any crazier than that.
Drikus 13 September 2019
They never get the hang of this. As long as not everyone draws a line in supervision, this will not work. And the genes that think they earn money by giving sick or dead animals . Can now see that in the end costs money extra vet costs extra money again. So is deducted from the proceeds of delivered animals. So in the end it costs more than what those few bad beasts bring in. And then the need of some can become even greater to give such kind of beasts. Because the rest also yields less, so those few extra cents are included. Are these duo supervisors still acting badly? Because as long as their mentality does not change, little will change in their functioning. Should there be 3 more?
Subscriber
south farmer 13 September 2019
Starting with ritual slaughter? No, of course we allow that. Too ridiculous for words
Skirt 14 September 2019
Ritual slaughter should have been banned for a long time, normal mind has been completely lost, I have long since given up hope that it will ever be okay here.
Jan Dijkstra 14 September 2019
Why not RITUALLY SLAUGHTER yourself and hand in the ear number for disposal. Good meat.what is destroyed is not sustainable
Skirt 14 September 2019
That is probably allowed if you first become a Muslim, then you have more rights than a farmer.
Drikus 14 September 2019
Blaming good people on Muslims does not help. This has little to do with this. A good product is already paid far too low in price. And then a less good product (animal) must also be tried to get the maximum amount of money out of it. So a few farmers stop these if possible among the good guys. And if then the well-paid NVWA also neglects its duty not to look. But elsewhere his time is full of fools. Then the temptation is great to do something that is not allowed. So those who give the animal to the carrier are doing it wrong. But the supervisor fails completely . But then add a second expensive uncle or aunt that the farmer has to pay. Normally the supervisor should be reprimanded . But the second person also brings good turnover to NVWA . And the farmer pays. So all the messing about in the end costs more money than it yields. And if good products from the farmer were also paid at a fair price, these animals could be put to sleep and transported to Rendac without hesitation. This benefited the image of the sector and that the meat trade cannot bring in extra cheap meat.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register