Marcel Klip / Shutterstock.com

News Summons FDF

Supermarket and farmer FDF not closer together

16 December 2019 - Anne Jan Doorn - 9 comments

The Central Food Bureau (CBL) and the Farmers Defense Force (FDF) did not come closer together in summary proceedings of 16 December. Although the two parties were unable to reach an agreement, even after the judge's insistence, the CBL seems to be getting its way. FDF has more or less promised not to block distribution centers.

But there is a catch. As chairman Mark van den Oever during the lawsuit also indicated, the action that FDF will take also depends on the judge's ruling Tuesday morning. It therefore remains unclear whether FDF will not indirectly hinder the distribution centers after all. "The fear that our distribution centers will not be blocked has not yet been completely dispelled," said Marc Jansen, director of the CBL.

No openness about action
FDF also did not want to disclose the actions to questions from the judge, because the surprise effect is part of the strategy. The judge struggled with this lack of clarity, because a clear plan is the only ground for a verdict. "The fact that FDF will not enter the private areas of the distribution sites does not, of course, mean that there will be no hindrance for the members of the CBL." The verdict will mainly depend on how it assesses the real threat to the distribution centres.

After the two parties had made their pleas during the lawsuit, a suspension followed, in which FDF and CBL had to try to find a solution together. CBL could have responded to the covenant that FDF sent the CBL on Friday. The farmers' organization indicated that if the CBL agreed to part of the requirements, there would be no actions against the CBL.

Don't negotiate with a knife on the table
However, CBL indicated that it did not want to negotiate with the knife on the table. CBL also refused to make any commitments about a specific requirement, such as shortening the payment term of 90 days that the supermarkets sometimes still use. The only promise that was made is that the CBL would like to talk to the farmers.

The court hearing was therefore disappointing for FDF director Sieta van Keimpema. "We would have liked the CBL to accept our covenant for a fair price for the farmers. Their reasoning that the term is too short to talk about this agreement is nonsense. We have been trying to talk to them for years, but that has failed. so far no results have been achieved.”

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Anne-Jan Doorn

Anne Jan Doorn is an arable expert at Boerenbusiness. He writes about the various arable farming markets and also focuses on the land and energy market.
Comments
9 comments
rule maker 16 December 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/financieel/ artikel/10885054/supermarkt-en-boer-fdf-niet-dichter-bij-ekkel]Supermarket and farmer FDF not closer together[/url]
If the judge here agrees with the CBL, there is something going on that I have known for a long time, there is no law at all in this country, everything that is crooked is made straight by the system, that is different from a legal system that the protect the weak against the strong.
Blue 16 December 2019
@ruler nonsense. This is not about the right to protest, but about a specific form of protest that will cause unsatisfactory damage.

Playing the pathetic Piet does our business no good.
rule maker 16 December 2019
your business is none of my business, I don't believe any of that, don't involve me in your delusions
Blue 16 December 2019
Labeling reality as a delusion has never brought anyone closer to their goal.
rule maker 16 December 2019
Labeling delusions as the truth even less
Blue 16 December 2019
Look, we agree on something after all :-)
d 16 December 2019
crappy supermarkets - they just want to collect money-
they don't give a shit about agriculture or nature.
It's now time for big ACTION - German farmers are coming too,
also call on the farmers from Zeeland and Belgium.
Farmers & Construction Workers ..... Flatten the whole country.
It is now .... or never .... otherwise Brussels will be your Boss.
Down with CDA
VOTE PVV GEERT WILDERS.
Jacob 16 December 2019
When a question to political parties about the amount of CO2 that one ha of sugar beet absorbs more from the air due to the increased yield now compared to 1955, then 7500 kg sugar per ha and now18375 kg per ha, I do not receive an answer or as an answer we do not have that knowledge. house. Our government cannot therefore make fair decisions.
pete 17 December 2019
Greed, jealousy and envy are the greatest threats to man
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register