Shutterstock

News Nitrogen crisis

Fire letter about nitrogen to Minister Schouten

8 October 2020 - Jorine Cosse - 8 comments

A group of 9 agricultural advocates once again expressed their concerns to agriculture minister Carola Schouten about the current nitrogen policy in a fire letter. The organizations urge the minister not to pass them by again and to enter into discussions about a strong foundation for the policy and the extent to which agriculture can contribute to this without being the victim of it.

The group, consisting of LTO Nederland, NAJK, Netwerk Grondig, POV, Agractie, NMV, NVP, BoerenNatuur and Biohuis, has indicated that it wants to contribute to solving the nitrogen problem. With the letter of fire, the companies want to prevent measures from being taken that will create an even greater gap between the government and the agricultural sector. The fire letter comes at a strategic time, because Schouten's letter to parliament about the nitrogen dossier is expected in the middle of this month.

The organisations, which partly already worked together within the discontinued Agricultural Collective, are critical of the minister's current approach. According to the group, its solutions on the various themes entail major risks for the future of family businesses that are characteristic of the Dutch agricultural sector. In addition, they stand in the way of company takeovers, which means that the prospects are not rosy.

Make balance
According to the group, the current approach is too diverse. The rejected Nitrogen Program Approach (PAS) entails the most difficulties, which the government says in some cases is trying to respond in a laborious manner. For example, solving problems is shifted to the responsibility of companies that do have a license, because the government wants to legalize companies without a license with licensed space from existing companies. As a result, the responsibility for legalization is shifting from central government to the agricultural sector in particular. The advocates think this is unfair.

In addition, there is a lack of prospects for legalization, which makes it impossible, among other things, to take over a company. Furthermore, the current area-oriented approach does not fit in well. As a result, it actually has no chance, according to the advocates. There is also a mishmash of registration systems. The group states that there should be a registration system in which all nitrogen reduction can be labelled, monitored and guaranteed.  

The advocates also conclude in the letter that the strength of the agricultural sector is insufficiently utilized with the current approach to solving the nitrogen crisis. They indicate that the sector is willing and able to further reduce nitrogen emissions. They do, however, impose a number of preconditions for this. For example, these entrepreneurs must provide a positive incentive to invest in reduction measures, with an appropriate payback period. The measures must also be cost-effective, proportionate and technically feasible, and take forerunners into account without affecting the financial capacity of future-oriented family businesses.

Utilizing a strong agricultural sector
The advocates therefore again call on Schouten not to pass them by, but to start the conversation. They request that this meeting be held before the minister sends her planned letter about the nitrogen dossier to the House of Representatives. "We would like to use our innovative strength to get the Netherlands out of the nitrogen crisis," said the formation in the letter.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Jorine Cosse

Editor at Boerenbusiness who studies the dairy, pig (meat) and feed markets. Jorine analyzes the roughage market on a weekly basis and periodically the compound feed market.
Comments
8 comments
info 8 October 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10889591/brandbrief-over-stikstof-naar-minister-schouten]Fire letter about nitrogen to Minister Schouten[/url]
Watch out, those environmental rascals have that lady in their bag for a long time.
Just like corrona, dry all stores for 1 week, then they all know who makes what for everyday life.
Subscriber
January 8 October 2020
where is fdf ?
8 October 2020
Modern companies are already no longer emitting nitrogen. Emission emissions will no longer be a limiting factor for stable construction in the future. That would rather be spatial planning. That was already known 10 years ago. We therefore also have to be careful that we do not start a discussion from 10 years ago. Making nitrogen tradable will solve many problems, including the following problem: earning back investments resulting from new legislation and regulations in, for example, the piglets or meat market.
When it becomes possible to make the nitrogen space that becomes available through reduction of emissions tradable, we can pay for the investment necessary to make this possible. We no longer have to deal with the problem that laws and regulations increase the cost of our products, and that we have to recoup them on the international market. It keeps us on track to improve our competitiveness and we can put future earnings into further developing our food production.
Furthermore, companies that want to stop can sell their nitrogen space and invest the proceeds in the new use of their business location.
When you say that the sale of nitrogen space creates a barrier for companies that want to grow, you are not aware of what is possible in our wonderful agricultural sector, then you think in terms of problems and not as an entrepreneur who is used to thinking in solutions . You also do not speak the language of the agricultural sector. Everyone in the sector knows about the new mixed company, you can't agree with the size of the company, but it does show what the future is in terms of emissions, among other things, or rather what the present is.
bassie 8 October 2020
No future prospects due to nitrogen vicissitudes or looting through external netting. The cause of the looting will not be external netting but insufficient financial prospects for the future of pig farming, pig farmers are afraid that we will go back to the situation before the swine fever in China. Over the past 20 years, pig farmers have further slimmed down their business operations and have started to produce more efficiently. As a pig farmer, you notice that the rest of the pig sector is doing everything it can to leave everything as it was and is even trying to achieve more margin and turnover from pig farmers.

It has been said often enough in the last 20 years that something has to change if we are to compete with other countries. The only thing suppliers and buyers have done is keep pig farms going with the help of loss financing in order to retain as much volume as possible and to make a profit.
This has destroyed the classic pig cycle, which has always been the strength of the pig sector, survival of the fittest. As a correction for the absence of the pig cycle, a buy-back scheme and possibly external netting will be introduced.

Instead of making the Dutch pig sector stronger, our chain partners have mainly been busy in recent years investing the profits they have made at Dutch farmers abroad to boost pig production there. By raking in knowledge, craftsmanship and money among Dutch pig farmers, our foreign competitors have made significant strides and are still doing so.

Our over-eaten, wealthy suppliers and customers have eaten us dry. Now that we are so hungry that a buy-out scheme offers a solution for a number of companies so that they do not have to continue the business with a noose around their necks, our advocacy groups are often sponsored by the wealthy suppliers and buyers, they have taken action over the past 20 years. sit sleeping?




seagull 9 October 2020
I'm curious
Albert 9 October 2020
Nitrogen problem nitrogen oxides (NOx) was solved by working from home and stopping duty-free, lobbied fun flights.

Corona outbreak due to release of holiday policy Rutte and draft of professor Grapperhaus is currently doing his predictable work.

There is no problem anymore, what in God's name is going on with our Rutte amusement park, how does BB explain this to the children at home?

(if they don't laugh at you...)
Hans 9 October 2020
info wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10889591/brandbrief-over-stikstof-naar-minister-schouten]Fire letter about nitrogen to Minister Schouten[/url]
Watch out, those environmental rascals have that lady in their bag for a long time.
Just like corrona, dry all stores for 1 week, then they all know who makes what for everyday life.

Fear that action is the only thing that works, in the current time of fear, however, I fear that there is little support from anyone.

Everyone must guard against exploitation of this fact and ensure that we preserve what we have built.
Subscriber
Skirt 9 October 2020
Schouten will soon be passe, nothing will come out now, but see again after the elections.
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register