PvdA

Politics Louis Asher

'More houses in the countryside thanks to agriculture'

26 October 2020 - Erik Colenbrander - 8 comments

If it is up to Lodewijk Asscher, leader of the Labor Party (PvdA), the housing shortage will not be solved by so-called 'infill' in cities. Building in a green environment is cheaper, legally simpler and less time consuming.

The party makes housing policy an important spearhead in the election program that will be presented next week. On Sunday evening (October 25) Asscher sat at the table at the TV program Buitenhof† There, interviewer Pieter Jan Hagens listed the disadvantages of infill in cities.

Agricultural land will become available through sustainability

Louis Asher 

Asscher responded by saying that conversion of office buildings into homes will also contribute to solving the housing shortage, but that agricultural land will become available because of the sustainability of livestock farming. "Investors wait for each other. You should not leave this to market forces. It is precisely now that the government has to step in."

Also the Groene Hart farmland
When asked whether the PvdA is also in favor of housing construction in the meadows of the Groene Hart, Asscher said: "I am not prepared to sacrifice nature, because we have very little nature in this country. There is agricultural land available in North America. and South Holland. People want space to recreate and walk in the greenery instead of in the gray buildings in the inner cities."

Earlier this year, together with the left-wing parties GroenLinks and SP, Member of Parliament Henk Nijboer of the PvdA emphasized how important the housing shortage is for the socialists. He did this by jointly advocating a multi-billion dollar fund for social housing, which would reduce the housing shortage and increase employment in construction.

Asscher's statements make clear what the agricultural sector can expect if left-wing parties can take power after the elections on March 17 next year. Unlike GroenLinks and SP, the PvdA has not yet presented the election program, but given the position taken during debates in the House of Representatives, it is not obvious that the party will place different accents than GroenLinks and the SP.

Limit agricultural exports
In the period when the Groningen organic farmer Harm Evert Waalkens was still the spokesperson for agriculture in the House of Representatives and the social democrats took part in government as an important political factor, the PvdA never cooperated in motions by left-wing parties to reduce livestock numbers. But that time has passed. Now the left-wing parties outbid each other mainly to see who wants to shrink the herd the most.

For these parties, making the agricultural sector more sustainable means circular agriculture that limits agricultural exports, that stimulates the import of agricultural raw materials and vegetable protein production, that levies a tax on meat sales and that limits scaling up and nature-inclusive agriculture rewarded with EU agricultural subsidies, on top of that a fair price for sustainable food.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Eric Colenbrander

Freelance agricultural journalist
Comments
8 comments
Subscriber
frog 26 October 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/artikel/10889796/meer-huizen-op-platteland-dankzij-agriculture]'More houses in the countryside thanks to agriculture'[/url]
So under the leftist banner is deporting farmers allowed to make room for their New voters? Let them welcome their New constituents to their dirty gray towns instead of sacrificing beautiful farmland!
26 October 2020
It is not sustainable to always build on clean soil. With agricultural land you can still go in all directions. That is why agricultural land is so extremely valuable for development, little costs need to be incurred to prepare the land for construction or suitable for nature.

It would be good to apply a form of circular construction in the Netherlands, in which buildings are no longer built on clean agricultural land, but instead. Vacant industry is used or office buildings as asscher already describes a bit. The construction sector is currently still very conservative, they can pour concrete in a clean meadow, but is that still possible?

I find it strange to make agricultural land available for other purposes, especially because then there is only one reason to severely curtail agricultural exports*. Especially when you know that a lot of agricultural land has been surrendered to, for example, build distribution centers of tens of hectares in size. An economic activity that yields little. It does mean that many guest workers are attracted to work in those centers. This keeps pressure on the housing market. This is positive, especially when you know that pressure on the housing market is the foundation of the economy because it keeps house prices under control and construction gets underway.


* In a small country like the Netherlands, we often speak of export. Is it really an export, especially if you know that most products do not go further than Paris?
Bart 26 October 2020
Because people need land for the construction of houses, new industry and energy, it is felt that agricultural production should be reduced.

Here in the region a lot of agricultural land is bought up and I can conclude that when agricultural land is given a different destination, it means deterioration.
The fog creative architects are attracted to build these grounds. Shoeboxes appear that are only tens of hectares in size and as high as an apartment building, you can hide the largest planes behind them, if you wish.

All together, thousands of guest workers work in these shoe boxes, who pack and unpack boxes in these mega large buildings with air conditioning (knowledge economy that adds something). This work will probably be automated within 5 years. And all this so that consumers can have their new clothes at home within a 'working' day, which they already have closets full of (clothing is, in my opinion, one of the most polluting products to produce, luckily these clothes are used abroad by children made so it can't hurt the Natura 2000 areas in the Netherlands), electronic devices are also repackaged. For example, producing these smartphones can't be bad for the environment, because when I take my new product out of the box it is completely clean And it smells new, and when I start it up for the first time I see a beautiful picture of a forest . I could look up how bad the production of electronics is, but I don't because then I feel guilty when I want to order the latest model every year, no, then I prefer to talk about agriculture.

The guest workers are moving from the campsite to starter homes, this is also urgently needed to maintain the artificial housing shortage in the Netherlands. The construction sector must be stimulated and when house prices fall to the real level, the Dutch economy will collapse. I am afraid that whatever cabinet is in, agriculture will always be the change. With a right-wing cabinet, we will have to make way for housing or industry, and with a left-wing cabinet, we will have to make way for nature and the environment.
Subscriber
howl 26 October 2020
wrote:
Subscriber
polder grower 26 October 2020
just put markerwaard dry and give it to amsterdam
Subscriber
Jan Veltkamp 26 October 2020
The PvdA is also fanatical against Russia. But I haven't heard from them yet whether they opt for shale gas from the US or just natural gas from Russia? For food, we will soon also be able to choose between faraway US or close to Russia. What they also forget is that agriculture is also an energy source that allows plants to convert sunlight into energy (starch, carbohydrates etc). Less agriculture automatically means more gas/coal/windmills etc. And as far as the latter is concerned, if a wall of extremely high windmills is built at sea, it will affect the wind direction. With the numbers that are there now, you can already see that the wind is more southerly and the warmer air penetrates higher in the Arctic Circle. Ever done an EIA? Why do the reporters never ask the politicians these questions.
Glass 26 October 2020
Do not expect farmland to become available, given the new political objectives. Agriculture must cycle more extensively and there must be more biodiversity. Then, even with a lower total production, there will be no room to relinquish agricultural land to urban development.
Harm 26 October 2020
Cheap agricultural land as building land, with politicians as a means.

This confirms what farmers have been shouting for years, but Holland would not be Holland if we respected traitors and vote for them.

Everything is given away, more newcomer families come in when new construction takes place, resulting in an increase in WOZ, the fictitious equity of banks with countries without equity.

A cigar from its own box paid 10fold to banks.
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Opinions Krijn J. Poppe

Governance is difficult due to our individualistic culture

News Speech from the Throne

'Food security important in uncertain world'

Opinions Kasper Walter

How our policymakers are faltering in energy transition

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register