Shutterstock

News Nitrogen

Nitrogen millions free for the purchase of peak loaders

3 November 2020 - Redactie Boerenbusiness - 10 comments

The Dutch provinces have received extra money to buy up livestock farms located close to Natura2000 areas. The cabinet proposes €350 million for the purchase of these 'peak tax collectors', of which €100 million will be released on Tuesday (today). The government thinks this will reduce nitrogen emissions.

The money will be released in the so-called Targeted Purchase of Livestock Farms Scheme, which is Government Gazette has been published. The acquisitions of the companies should help the cabinet to achieve the target that by 2030 at least half of the nature in Natura 2000 areas will be at a 'healthy' nitrogen level, as the cabinet describes.

Practically blocked
The cabinet emphasizes that the purchase is 'voluntary' and that the agricultural entrepreneur has a choice. However, the farmers' representatives say that the farmers involved have no choice, because their business is practically blocked. For example, with a view to future licensing. The government declares that the scheme is aimed at buying up 'peak loaders', i.e. companies that, according to the government's definition, cause a relatively high load on Natura 2000 areas that are nitrogen-sensitive and overloaded.

The scheme is aimed at companies within a radius of 10 kilometers of a Natura 2000 area. Through the scheme, provinces can conclude a purchase agreement with the livestock farm concerned, after which it is concluded. Not only is the nitrogen involved in the purchase, but the scheme also applies to achieve other government goals. Such as making areas prone to desiccation more climate-proof. 

Resolving PAS messages
But also agricultural entrepreneurs who want to continue farming will benefit from the scheme, according to the cabinet. According to the cabinet, there will not only be room for nature restoration, but also for solving the issue surrounding PAS reports. "In this way, work can be done on nature restoration, while at the same time creating more space for permanent agricultural entrepreneurs in that area and for other developments. In addition, agricultural entrepreneurs who want to stop are helped in this way," says a cabinet statement.

The targeted purchase scheme is one of the schemes that the cabinet has. A second (voluntary) stop scheme will become available in 2021, the National Termination Scheme for Livestock Farm Locations. Dairy, pig and poultry farmers can register themselves for this scheme in due course. A total of €1,9 billion is available for agricultural entrepreneurs who want to produce more sustainably or who want to stop.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
10 comments
Subscriber
Jan Veltkamp 3 November 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10889915/stikstofmiljoenen-vrij-voor-opkoop-peekloaders]Stikstofmillions free for purchase of peak-loaders[/url]
Most so-called nature reserves are simply man-made gardens at the taxpayer's expense. Most recently, a piece of Markerwaard has been sprayed on and Oh Oh, what great nature has already been created within 2 years. That's all fine. But if our nature is so malleable, why do companies have to leave because they are located near a piece of nature? That's just destroying capital. It is much easier/faster/more effective/cheaper to move that garden.
Subscriber
sweetie 3 November 2020
Are the production rights also withdrawn from the market or only the land and environmental permit?
Carla 4 November 2020
Just read the government gazette, everything except the (company) home is bought up.
But it is even worse than it seems because after the purchase, the farmer is no longer allowed to farm anywhere in the Netherlands, in other words: a professional ban. This arrangement is therefore only interesting for permanent quitters. But this arrangement is also disastrous for the stayers, who will be blocked in all ways in development.
Carola Schouten keeps saying that farmers bought out can get a chance elsewhere to develop a business, but that is a lie. How can we turn around these crooked regulations?
gerard 4 November 2020
and what about if you had a cow and you go in the goats, may that be at a different location
If I don't have a hair on my head that I still stay in the Netherlands
4 November 2020
The government simply pays the market price for business units. Do you not want a 'prohibition of profession' selling nitrogen rights and production rights to the highest bidder, and retain ownership of the land.

Such a purchase scheme only works if the government offers more than the market price.
4 November 2020
'professional ban' warm remediation of pig farming:

If a pig farmer has several locations
possesses and wishes to end only one of these locations, he is not required to
whether she also specifies his other locations. To that extent, a professional prohibition does not apply
talk. In addition, the Srv provides for a financial compensation from the government
for the termination of pig farming at a particular location, whereby the
requirement in question constitutes a condition for eligibility for compensation
can come. However, participation in the Srv is voluntary. A pig farmer who intends to carry out his pig farming activity elsewhere, at a new location
can therefore choose to sell the company itself instead of
to appeal to the Srv.

Source, answer 2nd chamber
Glass 4 November 2020
Interest representatives must commit themselves to improving the revenue model of the Dutch farmer.

A good earning model offers prospects for the future and that takes away the enthusiasm for farmers to participate in a stopper scheme. And ensures that farmers who want to end their business can sell it to a young successor.
When you are old and no one is willing to take over the company, what else can you do but participate in a stopper scheme.

You see it again with meat sales as soon as slaughterhouses cannot sell the meat due to internal problems, they dump the failure costs with the farmer and the pig price drops. The major shortcoming of the agricultural sector is that the farmer pays the failure costs of the entire chain, and nobody is ashamed of it. Other chains in our sector earn from volume trade (setting a margin on the purchase price and transferring those boxes) and the farmer has to rely on supply and demand, with less volume, more income.

When the farmers only had to pay for their own failure costs, the earning model for the farmer was already good. Without a good revenue model, all those actions against the government are completely useless and pointless.

Interest representatives have been hijacked by the large suppliers and customers of the agricultural sector.

Stop the parasites and piggybacking of the periphery on the Boer! It is good that future farmers' representatives are willing to take action and dare to hold the periphery to account.
Jan 4 November 2020
That's right, the farmer's business model must be improved, a lot of money is earned in the agricultural sector, not only by the farmer, but thanks to the farmer.
Research shows that the farmer (the primary sector) is the most important link in the agricultural complex. Too many links that provide no added value put the added value that the farmer provides (ensuring a constant supply, or purchase, of a high-quality product) into their own pockets. Recent lists also show that these are the richest people in the Netherlands.
Interest representatives should indeed focus on the farmer's revenue model and obtain this from our suppliers and customers. Standing up for the real farmers' interests.

#HETECHTEBOERENBANG #STOPPHETPARASITEREN
Schouten 4 November 2020
Good stories from Jan & Klaas. The suppliers and lobbyists earn a lot from farmers. They stand in the way of change. For example, the milk price in the EU must be set at a much higher level. The EU is for the EU farmers! Only then can it be sustainable (good income for farmers, good for the environment, etc., as well as abolition of the hundredths of subsidies). At least 100% of the EU agricultural budget (350 billion euros) goes to lobbyists and 10% to bureaucracy: implementation. Is Vogelaar able to calculate how much that amount is, what is thrown over the bar?
Pete Biden 4 November 2020
The rule in elections is that the majority vote AGAINST their own interests. About the earnings model of livestock farming: this is greatly helped by some of the colleagues being bought out. The manure disposal costs then fall very quickly to zero. And all kinds of residual flows that pig and chicken farmers are so proud to purchase, they now have to pay hefty for that. When the sector shrinks, feed suppliers have to stunt with the price. Everyone involved in intensive livestock farming will then not choose against their own interests. They call on the farmers to be proud of themselves and, above all, to carry on with all their might. "Don't worry about all those silly non-farmers who don't understand anything."
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up