Shutterstock

Politics CDA

Protecting agricultural land, how does it work?

6 November 2020 - Erik Colenbrander - 6 comments

The CDA wants to protect vital agricultural land, which can be read in the agricultural section of the election programme. What does this come down to, when it comes down to it?

Member of Parliament Jaco Geurts received a number of critical questions about this this week from left-wing opposition parties during the parliamentary debate on manure in The Hague. What is vital agricultural land? Does all agricultural land for food production count, and what about flower bulb land?

Living, working and recreation
The CDA wants a protected status for vital agricultural land to safeguard the future of the countryside and food security. In order to achieve this protected status, development areas for agriculture are designated in the new Spatial Planning Policy Document. These areas must have a good balance with space for nature, housing and recreation. The CDA also wants to protect Dutch agricultural technology, agricultural land and vital seed and seed companies against unwanted takeovers from abroad.

Geurts explained the phrases from the election program by pointing out the many interests that play a role in the Netherlands when it comes to filling in the space. "Living, working and recreation. Every square meter is already being used. Our starting point is that in any case the existing agricultural land also remains agricultural land. If it is possible to protect nature, then it is also possible to protect agricultural land."

Housing shortage and agricultural sector
Member of Parliament Laura Bromet of GroenLinks referred to State Secretary Mona Keizer, who in the past, as alderman in the municipality of Broek & Waterland, designated agricultural land in the outlying area as a residential area, suggesting that the CDA with government responsibility will also have to continue to make choices in the future.

In the run-up to the elections to the House of Representatives, the agricultural political debate focuses on the use of space in the countryside in the context of the housing shortage. Last week, PvdA leader Lodewijk Asscher sharpened the discussion by stating that residential areas in rural areas can be realized cheaper and faster than infill in cities. As far as the PvdA is concerned, this should not be at the expense of nature. 

agricultural Main structure
The discussion about protecting vital agricultural land is not new. Ever since the introduction of the Ecological Main Structure and the associated Natura 2000 areas in the late 90s, there has been talk of an Agrarian Main Structure. Recently, former politicians and scientists Cees Veerman (CDA) and Rudy Rabbinge (PvdA) argued for the introduction of an Agrarian Main Structure. Louise Fresco, chair of Wageningen UR, is also in favor of an Agricultural Main Structure. According to the proponents, a clear distinction between nature and agricultural areas offers scope for a structural approach to problems in the field of biodiversity, the environment and nitrogen. While there remains prospects for a strong agricultural sector, the increasing demands placed on agricultural land by society can also be met. 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Eric Colenbrander

Freelance Agricultural Journalist
Comments
6 comments
Subscriber
jantje 6 November 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/artikel/10889944/landbouwgrond-beschermen-hoe-werken-dat]Protecting agricultural land, how does it work?[/url]
If the CDA can co-rule, this is the first point they drop in the negotiations. Real talk for the stage to get the agricultural votes in.
6 November 2020
Perhaps we should move towards circular construction for the construction sector, where concrete is no longer poured on clean agricultural land.
This is a great opportunity to remediate, for example, abandoned industrial estates. Because we have to be careful with clean soil.
V23 6 November 2020
CDA can tackle many more problems regarding agricultural land. Now you see, for example, that provinces buy land from a farmer, then change the zoning to agricultural development area, or housing, and sell the land for at least double the amount to a livestock farm that needs space for business development, or housing. For example, money continues to disappear from the agricultural sector, and the financial situation on the farm deteriorates.

Politicians are increasingly citing the problem of revenue models within the agricultural sector, everyone earns from the farmer except the farmer himself. Products that a farmer has to buy are outrageously expensive. Products that a farmer sells are 'worth nothing', but as soon as the products have left the farm, they go upside down a number of times.

Let governments lead by example and ensure that the value that the farmer creates also ends up with the farmer. This extends the farmer's business model.
Subscriber
jantje 6 November 2020
In the future, only more agricultural land will be needed to meet the demand for space for housing, and this will again have to be compensated with natural land. So the government is just out on your land and wants to get their hands on this as cheaply as possible, no more, no less. That is why the idea of ​​the CDA is just nonsense and only intended to win votes.
info 6 November 2020
We used to have no problem with it, we just went to reclaim the Haarlemmermeer, Naardermeer, Wieringermeer, Ijselmeerpolders, even 3 pieces and then what I forget, this just became agricultural land, the techniques to reclaim the North Sea and the Markermeer is no problem, see the 2nd Maasvlakte . It 's ready soon , we are still whining to clear up farmers while enough ground can be reclaimed , no we always think , that farmer just let it rot . This way of thinking has to come to an end
Subscriber
Southwest 8 November 2020
V23
I know few farmers who are not happy with expropriation for urban expansion. For many people the way to become debt free.
If the owner sells your land what you lease, up to 80% of the free earth is paid to the tenant to buy it out.
Normally that is 5x the height of your lease price. 5x €800 = €4000
If the government "just" buys land, it is only logical that you stipulate that you share in the value increase over the next 24 years if a function change takes place.
You can often continue to farm on it for free until you start preparing for construction.
When you get into the position, talk and think along, don't say no beforehand
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Opinions Paul & Joost Bakker

Production or landscape turns land market upside down

News Farmland

NAJK positive but critical about revision of tenancy law

News Farmland

Grassland becomes 10.000 euros more expensive per hectare in one year

News Farmland

Grassland rises above 100.000 euros per hectare

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up