Own picture

Interview Jan Cees Vogelaar

'We don't know whether the nitrogen problem exists'

3 March 2021 - Linda van Eekeres - 9 comments

A debutant at the Binnenhof, but certainly no stranger. With extensive administrative experience within the agricultural sector, there are few agricultural entrepreneurs who do not know Jan Cees Vogelaar (58). First he was on the list of FvD, but after the struggles there, now on number 7 of the list of JA21.

Many farmers are disappointed in the traditional parties. You have also turned your back on the CDA, for which you were active. Why?
"That is motivated by disappointment in current politicians, who time and again have let the farmer suffocate. In the past 35 years I have never seen politics so bursting on the farmer."

What can be done differently?
"Policy should be made on the basis of science and knowledge and not on the basis of calculation models, as is currently happening. Not on the basis of 'expert's best judgement': that an expert puts his finger in the air and feels where the wind is coming from. "

The nitrogen problem, don't you think it exists?
"I'm not saying that. We don't know whether it exists or not, I'm not denying anything, because we haven't measured it. You have to measure it first before you make policy. No soil sample has yet been submitted in nature reserves. only measured air concentrations and then calculated approximately how much the deposition will be. We all have to put our heads together and then start measuring. We are talking about billions here. And if we do not measure, we cannot determine afterwards whether measures have an effect had."

What is the core of JA21's election manifesto?
"The core of our election program is: the entrepreneur must be able to do business. Nature and environmental organizations receive a lot of money for nature management, but it is never checked whether this is effective. Organizations such as Natuurmonumenten and Staatsbosbeheer receive millions for the meadow birds, but whether there are meadow birds "It doesn't matter. Start rewarding for the results achieved. For example, pay €1.000 or €2.000 per godwit. That seems like a lot of money, but that is a fraction of what is currently being invested in control measures and the effectiveness of this has not been demonstrated."

What do you think is the most important point in the field of agriculture?
"That farmers must be given the space to do business and that the very large regular diarrhea from The Hague of recent years must come to an end. It is cost-robbing and is not in proportion with foreign countries. You do not have phosphate legislation abroad, the nitrogen standards in Germany are 7 times wider than here. All those rules cost us money. The policy is also constantly changing. Look how the fertilizer policy changes every 2 years, the agricultural policy every 6 years. Companies had to submit a PAS report and are now faking in the street, outrageous."

The election program Van JA21 states that the responsibility for the income of farmers and horticulturists must be placed with the entire chain. How?
"Everyone says: if we raise prices, we increase income, but it starts on the cost side. Compared to other countries, we are above the milk price. You can pay 2 to 3 cents more for milk, but the regulation jungle ensures that the margin is ultimately lower. There must be fewer and better rules." 

The election program also states that modern innovative plant breeding techniques must be given the green light. Crispr-Cas is still banned in the EU. Are we in danger of falling behind?
"We are not in danger of falling behind, we are already lagging behind. Genetics and seed developers are already developing abroad, while we can stay put here. You are talking about all of Europe. With Crispr-Cas you can develop resistant more quickly. develop varieties. You can improve crop protection enormously. It is all about sustainability, and therefore also income. Fewer crop protection products means less expenditure. By applying Crispr-Cas, you can also grow 10 tons more onions per hectare, for example, and you have less mold pressure."

JA21 also wants to facilitate cows in the meadow and farmers who are committed to grazing. Should there be an end to cows that don't come out of the barn?
"We would like livestock farmers who have cows in the meadow to be actively helped with a larger house plot. The government should facilitate that. If you would like to see cows in the meadow, and you know that the house plot size is important, then that is a important thing." 

The reason for not becoming more sustainable is often stated that there is not enough demand from the market. What is the sustainable business model?
"There is also not much demand from the market. The consumer is looking: is it affordable and does it taste good? You only have to produce what is in demand. Albert Heijn has a partnership with Royal A-ware and their customers are prepared to pay for it." PlanetProof was installed from above and turns out not to work like that."

Ja21 is in the polls on 3 seats. What would you like to mean for the people who help you into the House with preferential votes in the next 4 years?
"Same thing I've been doing for the past 25 years: raising nonsense and madness and explaining it's different."

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
9 comments
Subscriber
Jan Willem 3 March 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/ artikel/10891212/we- know-not-of-the-nitrogen problem-exists]'We don't know whether the nitrogen problem exists'[/url]
with 3 seats, Jan Cees will enter the House with preferential votes if he gets more than 17.500 votes, and he has more than the number 3 of JA21? I read that something like this succeeded in 2017 that 4 people, including Maurits van Martels.
They read 3 March 2021
Vogelaar wants: "The same thing I've done for the past 25 years: to raise nonsense and madness and explain that it's different." So what has he achieved in that quarter of a century? Nothing! Vogelaar had to admit in the past year that the nitrogen measurement method of the RIVM was not that bad.
He wants to abolish the jungle of regulations, but many regulations actually provide farmers with income. Yes there are too many rules; 5-10 billion euros remain on the stick (civil servants, auditors, advisers, lobbyists). Abolition is only possible if a minimum price of approx. 45 euros per 100 kg of milk is charged in the EU and the milking farmer himself becomes responsible for the implementation of the desired environmental policy, animal welfare policy, etc.
Vogelaar lacks a vision and perspective for future generations.
bblogic 3 March 2021
We are sure that the nitrogen problem does not exist. The nitrogen-poor nature is the result of centuries of looting to make agricultural land fertile by means of sods and sheep manure. It took 5 ha of heathland to fertilize 1 ha of agricultural land. It was not until after the invention of artificial fertilizer that over- cultivation or heathland was no longer necessary. Little by little the heaths became more fertile again. So why should this nitrogen-poor nature be sacred? After all, it is a cultural landscape and certainly not nature.
Hank. 4 March 2021
Mr LEEN ; This Jan Cees Vogelaar founded the STAF foundation, gradually becoming the only reliable scientific research institution in the Netherlands.! This Jan Cees Vogelaar is our only representative, who can explain agriculture in all its facets.! This Jan Cees Vogelaar has had all kinds of board positions in the Netherlands, with good results! **This Jan Cees Vogelaar is the best candidate to represent the agricultural sector in the Netherlands.!! So Mr. Leen cherish this man, and choose him as our agricultural representative.!!??
Dronten resident 8 March 2021
It is good that there is someone who gives a strongly grounded counterpoint. Dubious clubs such as Urgenda, Wakker Dier and soured environmental activists gradually gained (legal) free rein and managed to disrupt current Dutch society. We as agriculture are also financing our own demise with Postcode Lottery tickets. I don't think there is a nitrogen problem and biodiversity in the Netherlands has been doing very well since 1990. Notabene based on data from the nature clubs themselves. Wish Jan Cees every success and strength, but I do wonder whether he had a greater chance at the VVD or CDA to get into the 2nd chamber.
Subscriber
peta 9 March 2021
Open your eyes Drontenaar!
Entering the room at VVD or CDA would be of little use, because then he would be muzzled there in practice, just like Jacco, Maurits and Helma. Everything for the plush preservation!
With STAF he has already achieved more for the sector than Jacco and Helma with their years in the room!
Subscriber
yay 9 March 2021
It's just a shame that there are multiple choices for agriculture, BBB, Yes21. It seems likely that CDA and VVD will rule again, but a good peasant party next door would be wonderful. The distribution of the peasant votes between these two parties (BBB and Ja21) might again yield too few seats to be able to make a small fist.
time bomb 9 March 2021
Drontenaar wrote:
It is good that there is someone who gives a strongly grounded counterpoint. Dubious clubs such as Urgenda, Wakker Dier and soured environmental activists gradually gained (legal) free rein and managed to disrupt current Dutch society. We as agriculture are also financing our own demise with Postcode Lottery tickets. I don't think there is a nitrogen problem and biodiversity in the Netherlands has been doing very well since 1990. Notabene based on data from the nature clubs themselves. Wish Jan Cees every success and strength, but I do wonder whether he had a greater chance at the VVD or CDA to get into the 2nd chamber.
Yes, I agree. It's now also a sniper lot like BBB.
37 games!!!!!!!They won't have a lot of splinters, but they will lose for those we expect it from.
Subscriber
peta 9 March 2021
A vote for VVD or CDA is a vote for a cabinet on the left with the leash around the neck from the left! They do violence to democracy by excluding the large supporters of the PVV and Fvd in advance from being recognized in their policy. So a VVD member who now remains loyal to his party is essentially an undemocratic socialist.
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up