Shutterstock

Background Financial

Worries about a farmer who will no longer be able to borrow anything

5 May 2021 - Linda van Eekeres - 12 comments

LTO and the Dutch Banking Association (NVB) are concerned that it will be more difficult for agricultural entrepreneurs to borrow money after the introduction of new guidelines (as of 1 January 2023). Just when the sector is facing major investments with a view to sustainability. They lobby jointly in The Hague and Brussels to get the sharp edges off. The proposal will be discussed in the European Commission this summer.

The so-called Basel 4 guidelines are international. The European Union has yet to decide how it will implement the rules. LTO is afraid that the new requirements will have major consequences for farmers. When asked, the organization says: "The Basel 4 requirements mean that banks must base their financing more on profitability and earning capacity and less on collateral such as land, buildings and installations. As a result, banks have to incur additional costs and hold extra capital. These must be passed on. in the price of capital. Banks will also become more critical of lending. Given the traditionally low yield and fluctuations in income in the agricultural sector, we expect that lending money will become more expensive and less easy. challenges that require major investment."

Models of banks sidelined
Now banks decide for themselves how much buffer they keep and they look at the risks. A spokesperson for the NVB explains: "You can look at the collateral for farmers; land is scarce in the Netherlands, so worth a lot and will remain worth a lot. Then the bank decides: Less buffer can be maintained. Those models will soon be sidelined. put."

With Basel 4, an output floor of 2028% will apply from 72,5. This means that the buffer may never be lower than 72,5% of the standard approach of Basel 4. "Then it is more difficult to finance farmers and that is certainly not useful in view of the transition to sustainable agriculture." The agricultural affairs working group of the NVB, consisting of ABN Amro, ING, Rabobank and Triodos, already brought this forward in a memorandum to the House of Representatives last year. 

Lobby in The Hague and Brussels
"LTO Nederland and the NVB are joining forces in the lobby in Brussels and The Hague to get rid of the sharp edges of the Basel 4 rules for financing in the agricultural sector," said LTO. The organizations hope that this will leave room for country-specific aspects. The European Commission will consider the proposal in the summer. It is then the turn of the European Council and the European Parliament.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
12 comments
Subscriber
Southwest 5 May 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10892119/zorgen-over-boer-die-straks-niets-meer-kan-lenen]Cares about farmers who will no longer be able to borrow anything[/url]
Then the problem is solved right?
Subscriber
crow 5 May 2021
Whatever problem has been solved will only lead to even more people from outside agriculture buying land.
Subscriber
jantje 5 May 2021
According to Ed Nijpels (VVD), farmers are occupying the land. In this way this can be put to a good end.
Subscriber
Southwest 5 May 2021
crow wrote:
Whatever problem has been solved will only lead to even more people from outside agriculture buying land.
The problem of farmers getting in the way of everything.
Subscriber
Peer 5 May 2021
It's very simple
Buying land is getting more and more expensive
Borrowing money is getting harder and harder
Conclusion; In the next 30 years, much of the land will be left to farmers. Whether you like it or not
Beemd farmer 6 May 2021
This has been the policy of banks for years, so nothing new under the sun.
gerard 6 May 2021
land price can also go down
experienced that land was sold for 60.000 guilders 2 years later that same land was sold again for half the price
what is expensive everyone wants what is cheap everyone leaves behind
Subscriber
Fortissimo 6 May 2021
Why is it a problem that farmers are not financed for investments in sustainability? Seems like a blessing to me. Lock on the door for future disappointments. Sustainability should not be the core aim of an entrepreneur, profitability as a trigger for sustainability is the best way and the preservation of agriculture for the future.
6 May 2021
Solve the real problem, make sure that one earns more money AS a farmer instead of the way a lot of money is made TO a farmer. Then it will be fine with those investments. If a farmer makes as much margin per product as the related companies, then a farmer with a modest company can still make more than sufficient margin.

You see that to a lesser extent in America, closed pig farms farm over a period of a number of years with a margin spread of -15$ per pig to break-even, while slaughterhouses make between 40-50$ per pig. Reportedly, the relationship in the Netherlands between pig farmer and slaughterhouse is many times further apart.

There is still enough margin for the farmer at the feed suppliers and slaughterhouses. The highest-earning farms make their profits there. The farmers who can't do that yet will never earn anything.

https://www.porkbusiness.com/markets/market-reports/profit-tracker-growing-packer/feeder-margin-spread
info 6 May 2021
That the farmer will find it less or more difficult to get money in a few years means that the equity must increase, and that means that we must receive more money for our products, only the citizen can ensure that by paying more for his consumer goods. . The farmers have to make more profit to be able to buy more land for the future, because the increase in scale that has been taking place for 50 years will continue after 2021 to feed the ever-growing population. In Germany, the government is already concerned about the non-farmers who invest in agricultural land, here 60% is already in private hands.
Ben 6 May 2021
The emphasis of the earning capacity of the agricultural sector is far too much on the suppliers and customers. The policy is far too focused on creating an optimal earning climate for these companies. The costs incurred by a farmer as a result of new legislation and regulations largely end up as income at related companies. Many laws and regulations lead to economies of scale, the advantages of which mainly end up with these companies, while the farmer pays for the economies of scale of scaling up. The peasant is being eroded from the periphery by these wealthy companies. The less successful entrepreneurs are largely dependent on financing from banks or suppliers and customers for investments. In addition, many of these wealthy companies from the periphery invest their Dutch earnings in competition from farmers abroad. This puts the Dutch farmer in checkmate, but he is not allowed to leave the game.
HC 6 May 2021
I will never forget it, about 10 years ago during my studies at the agricultural college we had a project in which we had to screen a company, both financially and technically, in order to determine a future vision for the company in question.

Finding a project company was not easy. The students whose parents seemed to 'own' large companies did not want to make 'their' company available.
These students suggested to take the company that they normally didn't think so highly of. It concerned a modern, up-to-date sow farm with +- 350 sows and an arable branch, the company belonged to the parents and one of the other students.

During and especially at the end of the project, we came to the conclusion that the company was in very good shape. The entrepreneurs had started small and had always been able to work without external financing by using the company resources as optimally as possible. There was a very large buffer in the form of liquid assets, no mortgages on the company buildings, the land and also not on the very beautiful private home.

Due to the very healthy financial position, all conceivable future scenarios were easy to realize and substantiate.
The business administration teacher and project leader (also accountant) of the project did not understand that when he saw and assessed the financial position of this company, there were still entrepreneurs building companies of 1000-2000-3000 sows or more; "because I was also able to see the accounts of those companies, do you realize that your project company is very wealthy, you can really learn something from this, large companies hardly have any net assets if they don't already have negative capital".

Finally, the project was assessed by an account manager from a well-known bank. Instead of assessing the project and the project report, this account manager used his time to explain to us that it is very nice for the entrepreneur in question to be able to earn money in this way, but that this way of working is of no use to a bank, "here As a bank, we don't earn anything from it." The money naturally ends up largely in the pockets of the entrepreneur, and is not swallowed up by the large cost of financing costs, and by entering into financing with suppliers and/or customers, losing entrepreneurship and freedom of choice.

google: who benefits most from 12 million pigs
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Financial

Energy prices drive Dutch inflation

BBTV Alex Datema (Rabobank)

Rabobank: 'Making things more sustainable makes companies stronger'

Analysis Enterprise

Rabobank lends less money to the agricultural sector

Interview Alex Datema (Rabobank)

New true value language offers farmers perspective

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up