Shutterstock

News Nitrogen crisis

LTO concludes nitrogen pact with nature organizations

25 May 2021 - Redactie Boerenbusiness - 9 comments

LTO Nederland has drawn up a nitrogen plan with the nature organizations Natuurmonumenten and Natuur & Milieu and the business organizations VNO-NCW and Bouwend Nederland. It voorstel, which aims at an area-oriented approach, is more ambitious than the current Nitrogen Act. "We challenge the government to accelerate the reduction of nitrogen emissions," LTO said in a briefing to members.

The proposal will be submitted to the political parties for inclusion in the cabinet formation. According to LTO, the nitrogen plan offers farmers a future, nature is strengthened and it creates space for new economic developments. The makers in the plan call the area-oriented approach 'essential'. "After all, the nitrogen situation differs per area and can therefore only be solved locally, whereby relevant players, such as farmers and nature managers in the area, participate instead of being imposed from above."

LTO is also counting on more support for this plan among agricultural entrepreneurs, as can be read in the proposal 'A sustainable balance.'  Whether this is the case remains to be seen. When asked, John Spithoven, chairman of the Nitrogen Claim Foundation, will let you know whether LTO has been authorized to speak on behalf of all Dutch farmers and horticulturists. Farmers Defense Force is also questioning LTO's mandate. 

More ambitious plan
According to the makers, the nitrogen plan is more ambitious than the current nitrogen law, which was passed in the Senate last winter. Where the Nitrogen Act provides for a reduction of nitrogen emissions by 26% in 2030, the 6 organizations aim for a reduction of 40% (117 mol) in that year. Of these 117 moles, 20 moles are for agriculture, 20 moles for industry and 20 moles for construction. The remaining 117 mol is then for nature restoration, the organizations write.

This requires €1,7 billion annually, or a total of €15,3 billion. This amount will be invested in broad innovation in agriculture, the voluntary relocation of peak loaders and the voluntary buy-out of quitters. The released lands are used for the extensification of the 'permanent' farms, the organizations report. Other measures include the conversion to nature-inclusive agriculture, compensation for agricultural nature management and more robust nature.

According to Sjaak van der Tak, chairman of LTO Nederland, if politicians adopt this proposal, this will create clarity for all agricultural entrepreneurs. According to him, they therefore receive sufficient funding to achieve the goals Van der Tak in a video message to members† For example, the plan aims to reserve €6 billion for broad innovations at agricultural companies, €5 billion for the voluntary relocation or buy-out of peak loaders and an extra €3 billion for agri-environmental management.

Legal shelf life unclear
It is not yet clear whether the plan is legally tenable. The organizations propose to the outgoing cabinet to review the proposal legally and to request advice from the Council of State and the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL). The plan can then be adjusted if necessary on the basis of the advice of these 2 institutes.

"With possible solutions to the nitrogen problem, profit for one usually means loss for another, as a result of which there has been a lack of broad support to date and the impasse continues with all the consequences for nature and the economy. We want to get out of that and that can be achieved with our approach. nature and the economy both benefit," the organizations said in the statement.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
9 comments
Subscriber
peta 25 May 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/artikel/10892410/lto-sluit-stikstofpact-met-natuurorganisatie]LTO concludes nitrogen pact with nature organizations[/url]
Who does LTO think she is anymore.
Constantly playing Judas and being a government servant will only make things worse!
Dare to point out as the main problem that the Dutch standard is completely out of step with our neighboring countries and that harmonization is a good first step!
This absurdly low standard is an official error that LTO accepts. How visionless can the LTO be?
Does all this have to be so to keep the subsidy tap open to maintain this misorganization in the absence of contributions due to massively dropping out of members?
Dear LTO, don't make it worse than it already is and go and talk to people from the BBB, there's common sense there, which is what your organization is missing completely!
Subscriber
old farmer 25 May 2021
Who does petatje think he is to pass judgment here?
A lot of screamers in agriculture apparently don't know how to negotiate with parties. FDF might be good at organizing a farmer's protest, but FDF is just not taken seriously. And then you achieve nothing. That goes for all activist clubs.

Furthermore, I have nothing to do with what kind of board of LTO. But stop with that unfounded denigration of LTO. No organization is perfect, but LTO has done a lot of good things for agriculture in the past.
Subscriber
the fries 25 May 2021
Glad to no longer be a member, what petatje says is in my eyes the truth, in Germany there is no N-problem, so in NL a paper created problem. Coming up with a solution now is also accepting that you have contributed to the problem, which is not the case, given our neighbors.
Subscriber
fact 25 May 2021
old farmer wrote:
Who does petatje think he is to pass judgment here?
A lot of screamers in agriculture apparently don't know how to negotiate with parties. FDF might be good at organizing a farmer's protest, but FDF is just not taken seriously. And then you achieve nothing. That goes for all activist clubs.

Furthermore, I have nothing to do with what kind of board of LTO. But stop with that unfounded denigration of LTO. No organization is perfect, but LTO has done a lot of good things for agriculture in the past.
I think old farmer is right in past they have done good things. but that has changed in recent years
ground worm 25 May 2021
It goes with the farmers here just like with the Indians in America the LTO always tries to smoke the peace pipe with the government but it is never good enough they want your land.
Soon there will be a few farmers left in a reserve.
Student 26 May 2021
“This requires €1,7 billion annually, or a total of €15,3 billion. This amount will be invested in broad innovation in agriculture, the voluntary relocation of peak loaders and the voluntary buy-out of quitters. [...] For example, the plan aims to reserve €6 billion for broad innovations at agricultural companies, €5 billion is for the voluntary relocation or buy-out of peak loaders and an extra €3 billion is for agri-environmental management.”

Bouwend Nederland, VNO-NCW and Natuurmonumenten have it very easy. Just sign in the plan and the farmers will solve everything.

LTO if you want support for constructive plans, then please show what the rest of NL contributes...
ideas 26 May 2021
The government negotiates more easily with a party with weak knees and if you are tough and business-like you will be set aside by those narcissists with false arguments
Subscriber
quite coarse 26 May 2021
Oh well, raking in 15 billion for the sector sounds good and the Dutch livestock industry is very innovative and is sure that they will make it.
But it must be ready in the next 50 years with increasingly strict regulations from the robbery.
The LTO does set the bar very high and what will the construction industry do?
It's also a shame that you only hear about our emissions and never about the nitrogen we absorb.
On balance, I think LTO is giving away too much.
bblogic 26 May 2021
Why is the LTO looking for a solution for a non-existent nitrogen problem? It would be better to make it clear that a large part of the Natura 2000 areas have never been nitrogen-poor by nature. For example, most heathlands were created by centuries of looting to fertilize the scarce building grounds with sheep manure and heather sods. Only with the invention of fertilizer did this come to an end and these poor soils slowly but surely became richer in nitrogen and therefore more fertile. Naturally, this is at the expense of biodiversity, because these poor soils provided space for nitrogen-poor flora and fauna, which originally simply did not belong here. However, for some reason this unnatural situation has been declared sacred, and the whole country has to pay to maintain this unnatural situation. At the same time, a large part of the world is fighting against soil degradation, and they are doing everything they can to keep their soils fertile. And in the Netherlands, under pressure from environmental groups, people want the opposite. I would expect common sense from LTO, and certainly no cooperation in this nitrogen frenzy.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Nitrogen

SSC fully opposes Brabant's stable policy

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up