Shutterstock

News Nitrogen crisis

'Role stroke shocked by LTO nitrogen deal'

25 May 2021 - Eric de Lijster - 6 comments

The requirements in the nitrogen plan that LTO has concluded with nature organizations and business associations are too high and legally untenable. Moreover, LTO does not have a mandate to decide on behalf of all Dutch farmers, various parties are cracking critical notes. "I was shocked by that nitrogen deal."

This is how Mark van den Oever, chairman of Farmers Defense Force (FDF), reacts: in a video message on the nitrogen plan 'A sustainable balance' that LTO presented this morning (Tuesday 25 May) with Natuurmonumenten, Natuur & Milieu, VNO-NCW and Bouwend Nederland. According to FDF, the nitrogen reduction of 177 mol that LTO aims for in this plan is equivalent to a 60,51% reduction in 2030. The newly adopted nitrogen law of outgoing agriculture minister Carola Schouten is based on a 26% reduction. "Where has LTO chairman Sjaak van der Tak been with his head lately?", Van den Oever wonders.

No legal security
Jan Cees Vogelaar, who has been refined in the nitrogen dossier from the Mesdagfonds Foundation, also sees a lot of snags in the plan. Especially in a legal sense, he writes on bulletin board. "There is no legal certainty, so the existing permits continue to come under fire from the MOB (Mobilization for the environment). Nothing has been arranged for the Pas-notifiers either, which means that the permit is delayed even longer." 

It also disturbs Vogelaar that, with the plan, LTO implicitly commits to the calculation models (Aerius) used by the Ministry of Agriculture. "There is no critical note about the underpinning of the Critical Deposition Values ​​(KDW) and about the applied calculation models." 

Representation of supporters
Both the Farmers Defense Force and the Nitrogen Claim Foundation have considered at length whether LTO Nederland is allowed to conclude such a nitrogen deal with nature organizations and employers' associations on behalf of the entire agricultural sector. "You have not received a mandate from the FDF members to reduce so far. If you want to reduce 60%, then do that with the few LTO members that are left." Incidentally, Van den Oever stated that FDF does want to comply with the nitrogen law. "26% reduction is really the max and not a percent more."

John Spithoven, chairman of the Nitrogen Claim Foundation, also comments on the representation of LTO. Especially because LTO does not disclose the exact number of agricultural entrepreneurs it represents. "For a universally binding declaration, more than 66% of the supporters must be represented. Then you can speak on behalf of the sector. I very much doubt whether LTO today represents more than 66% of all livestock sectors. I like to see that in black and white. "

Growing subcutaneous suspicion
At Van den Oever, Spithoven and Vogelaar there is a subcutaneous suspicion that more is already going on than just the nitrogen proposal presented, which is submitted as a discussion paper to the formation. Between the lines, they allow it to be suspected that the nitrogen plan has already been discussed and probed further politically than is now indicated. "I feel this is a kind of harbinger for the formation", Van den Oever says.

"Just like before with the Agricultural Collective, the government will shop around in the plan, there will be measures with much less money and there is no legal tenability of permits," writes Vogelaar. When asked, Spithoven also states that he believes that the nitrogen plan has already been discussed in cabinet circles. "All the stakes are huge and the parties won't come up with a proposal if they don't expect it to have a chance of success." He sees a preconceived scenario unfolding in the coming period, in which all stakeholders are prepared with news and information for further nitrogen measures.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Eric the Thrush

Eric is a member of the editorial staff of Boerenbusiness. As a descendant of an arable family, farmer's blood flows through Eric's veins. He considers himself a generalist, but with a preference for economics, trends, markets and marketing.
Comments
6 comments
Subscriber
Skirt 25 May 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10892411/rolberoerte-geschroken-van-stikstofdeal-lto]'Rolberoerte shocked by nitrogen deal LTO'[/url]
And again the LTO be with us.
Herman Geesink 25 May 2021
Help the farmers with the nitrogen models to the Philistines. Achieving an enormous CO2 reduction with the Greendeal. What is wrong?? More greenery due to alleged nitrogen in nature captures extra CO2. All agricultural land that is reduced at the expense of benefactors also no longer captures CO2, but more. With the plans of The Hague we end up in a downward spiral from here tut gunter.
Subscriber
sad horn 25 May 2021
it's the farmers' sale by LTO.
If you remove a circle of 1 kilometer around a 2000 natural area and turn it into nature (at least that's what they call it), then there will be farmers again against nature who then supposedly poison nature with nitrogen, etc , etc , etc. until there is no more farmer.

Oh and the planes fly over those nature reserves, but they don't count..........
Subscriber
peta 25 May 2021
Who is that LTO, is that an extra batch of environmental freaks at LNV?
Subscriber
south farmer 25 May 2021
petatje wrote:
Who is that LTO, is that an extra batch of environmental freaks at LNV?
And collective name for LTO, building Netherlands, nature associations and aviation I understand from the words of Mr. van der Tak. Whether they can still represent the interests of the peasants is verse 2.
Subscriber
take street 27 May 2021
Mr Tak finds it very interesting for his future to sit at the table with such parties,

Farming has nothing to do with it
You can no longer respond.

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Nitrogen

SSC fully opposes Brabant's stable policy

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up