Shutterstock

News Nitrogen crisis

LTO nitrogen plan hard to find support

30 May 2021 - Eric de Lijster - 10 comments

Support in the agricultural sector for the nitrogen plan launched by LTO Nederland with Natuurmonumenten, Natuur&Milieu, Bouwend Nederland and VNO-NCW is hard to find. Outside of LTO, almost every other farmers' organization disapproves of the plan. The Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency also does not want to calculate it.

The organizations POV (pigs), NMV and DDB (dairy cattle), Farmers Defense Force and Stichting Stikstofclaim have openly referred the plan to the trash can in recent days. Not only are major comments on the content of the proposal, LTO chairman Sjaak van der Tak is also accused of acting solo.

For example, the POV indicated that the nitrogen plan has 'no mandate whatsoever' and states that Van der Tak 'imposed this plan on the farmers'. For that reason alone, the representative for pig farming, in which the past LTO Varkenshouderij and the NVV have merged, cannot agree with the plan. The POV therefore states that it 'assumes that the nitrogen plan 'A sustainable balance' does not apply to pig farmers.

No connecting qualities
The Stikstofclaim Foundation also calls the approach 'not an example of unifying qualities' in a statement on Sunday evening (30 May) by Van der Tak. Nevertheless, the organization calls the content of the nitrogen plan a 'bigger divisive fungus.' Nitrogen Claim finds that the plan is absolutely not balanced, pointing to the more than €17,5 billion that the plan must cost over the next 10 years. "A great sacrifice is asked of farmers, they have to give up a large part of their rights and development space. A great sacrifice is also asked of society: they pay the bill through taxes."

But no hard results obligation is required of nature organizations in the field of biodiversity, concludes Nitrogenclaim. "Without such guarantees, there will be no Sustainable Balance. The benefits of this plan, which improvement of nature we can expect, are completely missing." Nitrogen claim expects that there is a good chance that 'this precious package will soon have no measurable effect on biodiversity'. The organization fears that the agricultural sector can expect another package of measures.

Pay yourself at
In the short term, the measurable effect will not come from the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (PBL). According to the planning office, the nitrogen plan is not detailed enough and the goals and measures still offer room for interpretation. The PBL places in a reflection on the nitrogen plan some critical remarks. For example, according to the planning office, it is not clear on what the 5 participating organizations in the plan settle themselves, in view of the billions of investment that is requested. "What substantive adjustments do they foresee if the goals are not achieved?"

The PBL calls the proposed pace of the plans high. She calls the bureau a risk to introduce technical innovations widely in stables, because some of these still have to prove themselves in practice. The pure focus on nitrogen is also a danger, because the reduction of other greenhouse gases can also come into the picture later when the climate targets are tightened. "It cannot be ruled out that the proposed technical investments will have to be written off more quickly at a later date if the climate targets are tightened."

Legally vulnerable
The relocation of companies also requires a considerable effort from the land use plan. The PBL also points to the pace at which nature must be restored and expanded. "The speed is being increased, while there are signals that the provinces are already faced with significant implementation tasks due to the extra investments already planned." According to the PBL, the intention to first use the nitrogen gain for economic development (such as housing construction) and only later to invest in nature may be legally vulnerable.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Eric the Thrush

Eric is a member of the editorial staff of Boerenbusiness. As a descendant of an arable family, farmer's blood flows through Eric's veins. He considers himself a generalist, but with a preference for economics, trends, markets and marketing.
Comments
10 comments
Subscriber
frog 31 May 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10892508/support-flat-stikstofplan-lto-ver-te-zoeken]Supporting surface nitrogen plan LTO hard to find[/url]
Fortunately I canceled my membership, I don't have to be ashamed of it either.
Subscriber
jpk 31 May 2021
What do those NMV fdf and pig farmers get arranged for animal husbandry ? Lto sits at the table for consultation. Why don't those yellers consult with lto. They all have a mobile phone. this union are the best helmsmen are ashore
Subscriber
Jan Veltkamp 31 May 2021
@Jpk, LTO is sitting at the table and the result is the worst thing we can think of. Without LTO at the table it probably would have been less bad. LTO can be used as a foot wipe.
Subscriber
janus 31 May 2021
ho ho,@jpk.de pig farming does have a plan! but that LTO does not want to consult / collaborate and just launched a plan, what can other organizations do about it. I attended such a seminar with bens, and he doesn't have to work with other advocates, he says very haughtily. Well then you are done..
Subscriber
farmer 31 May 2021
jpk who pulled the plug on agricultural collective? a plan even further than government wants while hope has not yet been measured or proven.
Have you ever been abroad? Nowhere in eu nitrogen problem except in the netherlands
Subscriber
jpk June 1, 2021
In the Netherlands most inhabitants live per square km, the climate agreements of Paris are fulfilled. Solution Minimize nitrogen emissions to help your business grow and thrive
Subscriber
camp farmer June 1, 2021
Dear JPK, by sitting at the table, it will soon be possible to say: you were there yourself, LTO, so don't complain that you didn't mean it that way. By being present and participating in conversations and not speaking out about Aerius, you have accepted the results of the ammonia calculations as truth and so have all members of you.
Subscriber
peta June 1, 2021
Is jpk at all familiar with the limit values ​​in our neighboring countries? These countries are in this eleventh EU, and Belgium is certainly just as densely populated as the Netherlands
And indeed, as Kempenboer already wrote, further accepting what is already necessary at the base, you only do that if you don't give a damn about the end result! The negotiators also put their own house on a solid foundation and not in quicksand!
Shame on you LTO.
Subscriber
jpk June 1, 2021
We can jump high and low the government loves cleaning up ideas performed by horse and carriage minister schouten
Subscriber
xandur June 2, 2021
It's called flight forward. This while people also sat at the table with the SER and knew what was coming. Again focusing on 1 thing and the rest out of the picture. When this is done, the next stick is there to hit with that goes exactly the other way.
Subscriber
jpk June 22, 2021
Lto has been sleeping because of the animal husbandry law of the pvdd, the same applies to crop protection and. Asbestos the robbery advised in 1961 to apply asbestos roofing, now moon men come to make you many euros lighter
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Nitrogen

SSC fully opposes Brabant's stable policy

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up