Albert Heijn

News Agro Nutri Monitor 2021

ACM: 'Expropriated farmer who cannot produce sustainably'

11 October 2021 - Linda van Eekeres - 5 comments

To promote sustainable agriculture, production must be limited and demand stimulated. This is stated by the Netherlands Authority for Consumers & Markets (ACM). The suggestions for achieving this range from increasing sustainability requirements to expropriating farmers who are unable to switch.

The ACM, which included the former cartel watchdog NMa, writes this in a letter to the Ministry of Agriculture when presenting the so-called Agro-Nutri Monitor 2021. According to the authority, the higher price of sustainable products is the biggest obstacle to making agriculture more sustainable. Many consumers are currently unwilling to pay more for this if there is a cheaper, conventionally produced alternative. Because Dutch agriculture is largely dependent on exports, according to the ACM, consumers abroad should also be willing to pay more.

According to the ACM, subsidies for farmers who produce sustainably and a VAT reduction can be considered to promote domestic sustainable demand. For exports, the authority sees benefits in "more cooperation between sustainability labels at European level. This can increase the willingness of consumers to pay abroad." According to the ACM, however, it is 'implausible that only demand-stimulating measures are enough'.

Voluntary buyout or expropriation
As an example of production-limiting measures, ACM gives: agreements between farmers and within production chains to meet higher sustainability standards, raising legal minimum sustainability requirements within the European Union or in the Netherlands, voluntary buy-out of farmers who produce regularly and cannot switch or, in the extreme case, expropriation of farmers.

In practice, this will involve a combination of measures that fall within these solution directions, ACM indicates. "These measures obviously have profound implications for the sector that need further investigation," the letter said. ACM does not specify anywhere what the minimum requirements for sustainability are and under what circumstances an agricultural company cannot 'switch' to sustainable business operations.

More insight into price development
The Ministry of Agriculture wanted more insight into the price development of regular and sustainable agricultural products. The ministry also wanted to get an idea of ​​the obstacles for primary producers when switching to sustainable agriculture. The results of the Agro Nutri Monitor 2021, conducted by Wageningen Economic Research, confirm the results from the first monitor of 2020. This is that the higher costs of organic production for most products are compensated by the additional price they receive for these producers. Wageningen UR investigated seven products: onions, Brussels sprouts, pears, tomatoes, milk, pork and table potatoes.

Enforce unfair agricultural trade practices law
To further stimulate sustainability, also in the agricultural sector, ACM has drawn up guidelines for sustainability agreements. ACM has also written the sustainability claims guideline with the aim of protecting consumers against misleading claims in the field of sustainability and to stimulate fair competition in this area. From 1 November, farmers, horticulturists, fishermen and many food processors can report unfair trade practices to ACM. From that moment on, ACM will enforce the Unfair Commercial Practices Agricultural and Food Supply Chain Act.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
5 comments
Subscriber
Jan V. 11 October 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10894585/acm-onteigen-boer-die-niet-duurzaam-kan-produceren]ACM: 'Expropriated farmer who cannot produce sustainably'[/url]
Why always start at the bottom with the farmer? Wouldn't it be better to start by obliging manufacturers to use, for example, "sustainably" grown potatoes for their chips and other (too) expensive products? The more processing food undergoes, the more expensive it becomes and the unhealthier. 2 birds with 1 stone you might say. But yes, the manufacturers and multinationals have plush seats (RvC) to give away, so our politicians are really not going to tackle them.
Subscriber
grey hairs 11 October 2021
where should consumers get their money?
gas electricity real estate tax and petrol then the bottom of the wallet will soon be reached and the food bank can already not answer all requests with yes
Subscriber
quite coarse 12 October 2021
First of all, block the less sustainably grown imports.
Subscriber
in hiding 12 October 2021
gray hair wrote:
where should consumers get their money?
gas electricity real estate tax and petrol then the bottom of the wallet will soon be reached and the food bank can already not answer all requests with yes
healthy food isn't expensive, so that's not the problem. and food is a necessity of life and you can't always say that about other things
not 13 October 2021
Strange, nobody wants it, not the consumer, not the farmer, and yet the government wants to push it through, what are they doing?
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up