Shutterstock

News Nitrates Directive

Schouten adjusts Nitrates Directive proposal

26 November 2021 - Redactie Boerenbusiness - 22 comments

Agriculture Minister Carola Schouten has adapted the draft 7th action program Nitrates Directive. The necessary matters - such as the time to sow a catch crop - will be relaxed, except for sandy and loess soils. The impact on agriculture and horticulture will nevertheless remain significant after these adjustments, the caretaker cabinet acknowledges. Further measures will be passed on to a new cabinet.

The Council of Ministers has agreed, so that the final 7th Action Program (AP) will be sent to the House of Representatives. Schouten and her colleague Barbara Visser of Infrastructure and Water Management announced this in a statement.

An important part of the 7th AP is the obligation to sow a catch crop by 1 October, something that has raised concerns. in the sector soared this year. This obligation will only apply to sandy and loess soils, the cabinet reports. Winter crops are excluded from this rule. The following crops may fall into this category: winter vegetables, flower bulbs that are planted in autumn, sugar beet and starch potatoes. The Committee on Experts in the Fertilizers Act (CDM) will advise on this.

Although in principle the minister maintains the mandatory sowing of a catch crop before 1 October after maize, a committee is set up that annually issues advice on the feasibility of sowing the catch crop in view of the weather conditions. Farmers do have the opportunity to sow the catch crop after maize or other non-winter crops after October 1, but then a discount on the user standard will follow. In the period up to 1 November, the fertilizer standard for the coming year will be reduced proportionally. When sowing after 1 November or when no catch crop is sown, there is a maximum discount on the fertilizer standard for the following year. The CDM is still being asked for advice on the determination of the discount on the usage standard.  

One of the adjustments is also the mandatory rotation with rest crops, so that less fertilizers leach into the groundwater. This will also only apply to sandy and loess soils. Because the impact on clay and peat soils is small, according to the cabinet, these soils are excluded from this, as are organic arable farming and long-term crops, such as tree cultivation, asparagus cultivation and some ornamental crops.

Sector proposal 'customized approach' weighs in
To improve water quality, sector parties LTO Nederland, NAJK, NAV, POV, BO Akkerbouw, NZO, Rabobank and Cumela jointly initiated a so-called 'customized approach'. The entrepreneur works with a plan adapted to his or her company to achieve the water quality goals. It has been agreed to further develop this tailor-made approach together with central government, the cabinet announced.

Despite the adjustments, the 7th AP remains a strong package of measures with a significant impact on agriculture and horticulture, the cabinet realizes. "However, the task of improving water quality is great and the current package, according to the calculations of the environmental effects, is still insufficient to achieve the targets for surface water quality of the European Nitrates Directive and the Water Framework Directive. A new cabinet must - in conjunction with the nitrogen and climate dossier - make further choices," said a statement.

€118,7 million has been made available for future manure policy. Over the next four years, this money will be used for research and pilot projects, support for area processes, monitoring, supervision and enforcement.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
22 comments
Subscriber
sandpiper 26 November 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10895430/schouten-past-proposal-nitrate-guideline-aan]Schouten adapts proposal of Nitrate-guideline[/url]
As arable farmers, we do not allow ourselves to be played off by concessions in different areas.
today it is the sand and loose tomorrow it is the clay or peat. resilient rules for all arable farming!!!
and stop the regulatory drive from The Hague. arable farming cannot be played out in groups.
Subscriber
medium 26 November 2021
idiot at its best, you really can't do anything with this!!! think that the fries factories should also be heard more because I don't hear them anywhere they are also touched in the end by the stupidity of the government!
Subscriber
sandpiper 27 November 2021
or else the friefabriek has to make a starch contract for fontane
Subscriber
Klai- and zoavelboer 27 November 2021
Sandpiper has a point there.
Subscriber
Space 27 November 2021
sandpiper wrote:
or else the friefabriek has to make a starch contract for fontane
Can the contract price be lowered a bit?
Harm 27 November 2021
sandpiper wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10895430/schouten-past-proposal-nitrate-guideline-aan]Schouten adapts proposal of Nitrate-guideline[/url]
As arable farmers, we do not allow ourselves to be played off by concessions in different areas.
today it is the sand and loose tomorrow it is the clay or peat. resilient rules for all arable farming!!!
and stop the regulatory drive from The Hague. arable farming cannot be played out in groups.
I think she wants to apologize to you because you misunderstood
Subscriber
truth 27 November 2021
1 October consumption potatoes have gone from the field.....owg not high enough...then it's animal feed...and if the potatoes are green it also absorbs minerals in my view! so what don't understand
Subscriber
epv 27 November 2021
On Monday in the webinar, various organizations said that it was not possible to shop in their customized approach. Not even half have taken over Lnv. So shopped by lnv. That is why now the urgent appeal to these organizations: The back rights and the bat in the henhouse in The Hague. Totally unacceptable what has now been decided by The Hague
Subscriber
sefO 27 November 2021
Schouten must have more respect for the main crop the main crop must be leading it does not matter whether you farm on sand or clay "point"
Immediately after the main crop the catch crop on it.
Schouten has to use her eyes, go along the fields, the harvests were 2 to 3 weeks later this year, so the catch crop is also much later, I think that 90 to 95% acreage is already green again.
But the problem is Schouten doesn't want to (see) this
Schouten is also disrespectful about growing food in this area
Subscriber
Southwest 27 November 2021
epv wrote:
On Monday in the webinar, various organizations said that it was not possible to shop in their customized approach. Not even half have taken over Lnv. So shopped by lnv. That is why now the urgent appeal to these organizations: The back rights and the bat in the henhouse in The Hague. Totally unacceptable what has now been decided by The Hague
There is nothing to back it up, the Ko compromise clubs have released their diarrhea on the webinar. Lnv unpacks some things here for the show and we can do it with it. Not responding at all is the best remedy, we now had a completely unworkable plan that can be challenged in court. Now we have a so-called sector-wide solution, you have finished talking.
west Brabant 27 November 2021
I'm afraid these fabrications won't do anything for the environment
Subscriber
Drent 28 November 2021
SjefO wrote:
Schouten must have more respect for the main crop the main crop must be leading it does not matter whether you farm on sand or clay "point"
Immediately after the main crop the catch crop on it.
Schouten has to use her eyes, go along the fields, the harvests were 2 to 3 weeks later this year, so the catch crop is also much later, I think that 90 to 95% acreage is already green again.
But the problem is Schouten doesn't want to (see) this
Schouten is also disrespectful about growing food in this area
catch crop is going to cause more and more problems instead of adding something. This year I see clearly more animal consumption on plots where a catch crop has stood and with 0 resources this will cause an increasing problem.
Subscriber
frog 28 November 2021
drent wrote:
SjefO wrote:
Schouten must have more respect for the main crop the main crop must be leading it does not matter whether you farm on sand or clay "point"
Immediately after the main crop the catch crop on it.
Schouten has to use her eyes, go along the fields, the harvests were 2 to 3 weeks later this year, so the catch crop is also much later, I think that 90 to 95% acreage is already green again.
But the problem is Schouten doesn't want to (see) this
Schouten is also disrespectful about growing food in this area
catch crop is going to cause more and more problems instead of adding something. This year I see clearly more animal consumption on plots where a catch crop has stood and with 0 resources this will cause an increasing problem.
I completely agree with you Drent, and if you also combine it with that other twist that they keep calling, namely NKG, then the problems can no longer be overlooked.
tenant farmer 28 November 2021
are private farmers not included?

(Like private ICs at economy burn for reset?)
info 28 November 2021
Drent you are right, but because of the derogation, which means extra rules, where the government keeps making stricter demands on us with an extra rule every year, they have taken over our planning. In my opinion, weather influences that we as farmers have to work with should also have been included in their policy. We have come to the point of just making it a 2nd place, if it fits, follow the government but first carry out your own building plan. And accept the consequences of deductions, we must be able to farm more towards freedom, after all, it is a liberal profession, but in my opinion no longer.
Subscriber
Wim 29 November 2021
Thanks to all farmers and contractors who in recent years could not resist dumping as much manure as possible on their plots in a cheap way.
Subscriber
Cm 29 November 2021
Wim wrote:
Thanks to all farmers and contractors who in recent years could not resist dumping as much manure as possible on their plots in a cheap way.
So there's another Troll spreading false messages
The soil is currently impoverishing because we as farmers cannot use enough fertilizer that the crops need and extract from the soil.
Subscriber
Cm 29 November 2021
No, rather no manure but much more fertilizer than use certainly or no not that too of course. Without food nothing grows, but try yourself without food Trol Wim then we will be rid of all that nonsense of yours.
zwb sand jan 29 November 2021
Dear cm, where do you think this regulation comes from differently, no problems here with nitrate, but from impoverishment of the soil.
Subscriber
Drent 29 November 2021
Wim wrote:
Thanks to all farmers and contractors who in recent years could not resist dumping as much manure as possible on their plots in a cheap way.
tell me how to do that, because I am bound by my supply standard unfortunately
Subscriber
Cm 29 November 2021
zwb zandjan wrote:
Dear cm, where do you think this regulation comes from differently, no problems here with nitrate, but from impoverishment of the soil.
Regulations are the limiting factor, I cannot use solid manure enough and I do not want compost with all its contaminants. But the government wants to get rid of that, so the other has much higher standards than farmyard manure or mushroom compost, etc. The (R) government is guilty of the impoverishment of the soil and not that farmer, but they have only one goal and that is remediation.
connoisseur farmer 29 November 2021
the big problem is that everyone threatens to know so well.
but in reality just what cries out.
we have been a mixed company arable farming/horticulture/livestock since 1940
Whether you are not on sand/peat/clay does not matter.
we can hardly do anything anymore a very meager manure policy which hurts our farmer's heart we ourselves have the most beautiful solid manure which is the best of the best for the soil, we have to remove and supply fertilizer ourselves, how the world is reversed.
and then farmers cry out the soil!!!! first they smoke us out themselves with a manure policy that still touches the shore and then we would take care of the soil badly, which strikes the wrong chord with us.
that's why we should just ignore these rules this 7th plan is not feasible / not workable / and a large part of our income is killed this will cost our heads if we go along with this!!!
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register