Agriphoto

News Crop protection

Data determines Bayer's pricing resources

12 August 2019 - Niels van der Boom - 3 comments

The American branch of crop protection giant Bayer Crop Science is starting a new way of selling products in the United States. The data is the basis for the price. If the product does not do what it promises, you will receive the money back.

The system is not new to Bayer. Since last year, it has been using data from farmers to advise on the purchase of seed. The program collects all the customer's cultivation data and thus finds out what the yield of a maize or soy variety was. This coupled with the location, the weather and the inputs can predict which breed will best suit your farm. This can also be a mix of different hybrids.

Not happy, money back
Bayer will now also use the data technology for crop protection products: in terms of price. If the product does not do what was promised by the manufacturer, you will get your money back. For example, if Bayer claims a yield increase of 3 bushel, but in practice that is 2 bushel, you will get the price difference of the missed bushel back. about this writes the American news site Ag Web.

However, the penny can also fall the other way. In this example, if the grower does not get 3, but 6 bushels of additional yield, the grower pays the manufacturer more for the drug. This price structure works up to a 10 bushel return on soybeans. Everything above that is in your own pocket. According to Bayer, this helps arable farmers to try more resources.

Data the key to success
Everything revolves around data in this system. That's where Bayer's trump card comes in. With the incorporation of Monsanto, it also acquired subsidiary 'The Climate Corporation'. Their FieldView software is crucial. This management program collects all cultivation data and then makes a decision. Since yields in the United States fluctuate very little, the yield fluctuation can be predicted with reasonable certainty.

There is no exact launch date yet, according to Liam Condon, the director of this section. There are still a number of complex issues to be solved. It is unknown whether Bayer will also apply the technology in Europe and the Netherlands. Bayer Nederland could not be reached for comment at the time of writing. The FieldView program is already being tested in Europe and was launched in 2017. Arable farmers in countries such as Germany, France and Ukraine make use of the beta.

In the Netherlands too?
Expanding the method here is not easy, because yields can fluctuate considerably due to weather influences. For example for a crop such as potatoes or onions. It is then extremely difficult to predict what the effect of the drug would be. It does clarify that collecting and using data can help companies to sell their products better. The 'giving away' of data is also an issue on which agricultural entrepreneurs are becoming increasingly critical.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Niels van der Boom

Niels van der Boom is a senior market specialist for arable crops at DCA Market Intelligence. He mainly makes analyses and market updates about the potato market. In columns he shares his sharp view on the arable sector and technology.
Comments
3 comments
Known to the editor 12 August 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/akkerbouw/artikel/10883613/data-determines-price resources-van-bayer]Data determines price resources of Bayer[/url]
Niels, if we are going to use data as a sales argument or payment argument, it would be good to also include the substantive quality argument.
The substantive quality of our food, and what it means for the health of the consumer, determine whether he/she is willing to pay a fair price for it. In the case of healthy food, the additional costs of the food far outweigh the savings in healthcare costs for the consumer. So maybe a win, win situation.
hans 12 August 2019
Do you want to put an end to the existing win-win situation?
Our mega rich shareholders are already raking in 2 sides:
the FOOD-PHARMA complex with Bayer in a leading role.
Food makes us rich western consumers sick, pharma keeps us sick. They can't make it more fun.
Skirt 13 August 2019
I class these practices under the name of the supplier's bow, I see no further win situation for the grower. A product that is not satisfactory often disappears from the market quickly and everything regulates itself perfectly.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Crop protection

Chinese asset sales enter next phase after major growth

News Arable

Mandatory use of closed filling system by 2027

News Crop protection

Hof van Twente bans ornamental horticulture from the municipality

News Arable

Stolbur disease also a threat to onion cultivation

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Register