Shutterstock

News Nitrates Directive

'Agriculture must pay for pollution costs'

9 July 2021 - Jurphaas Lugtenburg - 13 comments

The polluter pays. That principle still applies too little to the agricultural sector, according to the European Court of Auditors in a report published this week. Agriculture plays an important role in water pollution in particular, without the sector having to bear the costs.

Under current European regulations, the polluter pays principle is mainly found in environmental legislation. According to the Court of Auditors, agriculture is still largely left out, so that it is mainly the taxpayer who bears the costs of pollution. According to the Court of Auditors, that must change. The researchers state that the agricultural sector has a large share in the pollution of water with nitrate and plant protection products.

However, the agricultural sector makes very little financial contribution to wastewater treatment, because by far the largest part of the water used does not end up in the sewage system, according to the accountants. It cites a French study done in 2011, which found that each household in France in the worst-affected areas incurs up to €494 per year in additional costs as a result of water pollution.

Practice is unruly
The Court of Audit admits in the report that it is very difficult to apply the polluter pays principle in agriculture. The sources of pollution are very diffuse and, for example, in the case of nitrate, it can also take decades before the substance ends up in the groundwater because it is stored in the soil and moves slowly. It is therefore virtually impossible to trace the source of the pollution. In addition, any changes in agricultural practice would have a delayed effect on water quality.

In the report, the Court of Auditors makes recommendations: to lower emission limit values ​​to reduce residual pollution and to tackle diffuse water pollution from all sources, including agriculture. However, no concrete measures are mentioned in the report.

The full report is here to find.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Jurphaas Lugtenburg

Is editor at Boerenbusiness and focuses mainly on the arable farming sectors and the feed and energy market. Jurphaas also has an arable farm in Voorne-Putten (South Holland). Every week he presents the Market Flash Grains
Comments
13 comments
Subscriber
Skirt 9 July 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/akkerbouw/artikel/10893194/landbouw-moet-opschrijven-voor-kosten-polder]'Agriculture must pay for the costs of pollution'[/url]
Shortest blow is locking up the farmer and converting his soil into nature
Subscriber
Limburger 9 July 2021
It is of course best to ban all crop protection products and fertilizers in Europe with immediate effect!
I wonder if in 12 months Corona will still be the number 1 news in Europe.
Subscriber
Skirt 9 July 2021
Indeed, why still resist. It's going completely that way.
Subscriber
frog 9 July 2021
kjol wrote:
Indeed, why still resist. It's going completely that way.
Because it still isn't good enough !!!
9 July 2021
As a farmer we already pay the failure costs of the wealthy suppliers and customers such as feed suppliers and slaughterhouses, then this can also be added.
Thomas 10 July 2021
Yes, they don't measure in the other sectors, so you don't pollute anything, uhmm.
Subscriber
Ad 10 July 2021
Are there not 6 times as many medicine residues as pesticides in the water?
Subscriber
jk 10 July 2021
Ad wrote:
Are there not 6 times as many medicine residues as pesticides in the water?
yes, that is correct according to rivm research
roy 10 July 2021
why don't we hear about that???
Subscriber
Joop 10 July 2021
Limburger wrote:
It is of course best to ban all crop protection products and fertilizers in Europe with immediate effect!
I wonder if in 12 months Corona will still be the number 1 news in Europe.
Many substances have already been banned and many more are being released. Nevertheless, record quantities of potatoes and onions have been grown in recent years, not to mention the milk. We have to deal with it and will have to work in a different way.
Roy 11 July 2021
yes record quantities of poor quality product, the waste will be gigantic and not suitable for export. This causes great damage to farmers and hunger in the world...
Subscriber
yay 11 July 2021
I am also for, all of Europe organic. Bringing import requirements to the same standard, so all imports are also organic. If they guarantee this, I see a bright future ahead!
Subscriber
jk 11 July 2021
joepi wrote:
I am also for, all of Europe organic. Bringing import requirements to the same standard, so all imports are also organic. If they guarantee this, I see a bright future ahead!
only the import requirements the same as we have to meet is sufficient for a bright future
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register