Own picture

News Nitrogen

'New nitrogen crisis that does not include the current one'

24 January 2023 - Linda van Eekeres - 22 comments

There is a threat of 'a new nitrogen crisis that dwarfs the current one'. Bert-Jan Ruissen, member of the European Parliament on behalf of the SGP, warns against this. He is talking about the European nature restoration regulation which stems from the Biodiversity Strategy and the Farm-to-Fork Strategy and which is currently on the plate of the European Parliament. "We are heading for a hot summer," predicts Ruissen.

"If this regulation is adopted, we will have to deal with additional nature tasks, also outside Natura 2000. A so-called 'deterioration ban' would also apply there," said Ruissen during an SGP conference on food security that was held last Friday, January 20 in Wells.

10% area out of production
"Farmers will have to take 10% of their area out of production", the politician refers to the objective that "landscape elements with great diversity" should cover at least 10% of the agricultural area of ​​the European Union. According to the draft regulation, this means that this 10% of existing agricultural land may not be used for productive agriculture (including grazing or fodder production) and may not be treated with fertilizers or pesticides. What is allowed, for example, is fruit-bearing trees in a food forest, provided that 'the harvest only takes place at times when biodiversity is not threatened'.

If the European Commission's plans go ahead, the Netherlands must also designate habitats for species. Ruissen: "Habitat types will have to be restored and we will have to go back seventy years in time to see what habitats we had in the Netherlands at the time. That must then be submitted to the Commission for approval and we know how that works: if the Commission If you don't think it's ambitious enough, it will be sent back."

'It all sounds wonderful'
"And that should be the basis for the nature recovery plans. It all sounds wonderful, of course, but I know one thing for sure: if we do this, we will end up in a new nitrogen crisis, which will dwarf the current one." Within the European Parliament there is a lot of opposition to the plans as they are now. Ruissen predicts: "It will be an exciting battle. We are going to have a hot summer."

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
22 comments
Subscriber
Gijsbertus 24 January 2023
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness[/url]
if we have to go back 70 years in time, many houses will have to be demolished instead of being allowed to be built. and the human density of the Netherlands will also be halved.
Subscriber
time bomb 24 January 2023
And fewer inhabitants. Emigration premium, and salt up a mountain.
Subscriber
CM 24 January 2023
Okay then, but also the rest of the population with life 70 years back in time. Who's taking this!!!
Subscriber
yellow and red 24 January 2023
That is very unfortunate for the Flevopolder, which had not yet been reclaimed at the time, so Almere and Lelystad are also gone.
How many residential areas will have to go and also a lot of (created) 'nature' and 'forests' or are we going to measure again with two or many more standards.
What a silly country we live in.
Subscriber
Bold 24 January 2023
Why is that only 10% out of production?
Prices in the air
Subscriber
peter 24 January 2023
70 years back in time. then we go by horse and carriage. All machines gone and many people gone. All cars gone nice and quiet
Subscriber
frog 24 January 2023
70 years ago? interesting period as a reference!
Subscriber
Can't think of anything more positive 24 January 2023
70 years back in time, then we would gain half a million hectares of agricultural land.
Subscriber
Zeeuw 24 January 2023
Seriously now, there can't be any more unless? If the European ecologists, the greens, now think they are scoring, they must count on a shift to the right. As long as our Franske Timmermans moves once a month with the entire club from Brussels to Strasbourg and also announced CO1 tax, he must count on the EU to flop. Note that 2% surrender of agricultural land and say another 10% N is a 20% reduction in food production. No citizen can approve that and so the EU or civil war flops. I don't worry about this anymore.
Subscriber
ideas 25 January 2023
What I'm wondering now is; If something is built on former agricultural land, 10% nature must also be created. Or is that too much to ask?
Subscriber
Brabant 26 January 2023
I no longer participate in what the politicians want

Do my own thing from now on
Done is done and enough is enough
They're going to look for common sense first
Subscriber
gerard 26 January 2023
I think nitrogen is a nice diversion
we agreed that we would not raise the budget deficit above 60% of gdp
there is no country that adheres to it
yes there are a few exceptions if you already had a GDP of 110% but then it had to go down
I can only see it rising
Subscriber
time bomb 27 January 2023
All farmers and related companies throughout Europe must fight. Start all of this right away and flatten the whole of Europe. We are much too European. We must not and must not be afraid of government violence. There is no more tank to get, so we can go ahead undisturbed, and catch bandits like van der Wal and de Groot. It MUST stop.
Subscriber
Skirt 27 January 2023
I am glad that I am a farmer myself, the consumer will soon pay blue for food.
However, I suspect that the government will skim off the price on the farmer. Already happening with green energy.
Subscriber
CM 27 January 2023
kjol wrote:
I am glad that I am a farmer myself, the consumer will soon pay blue for food.
However, I suspect that the government will skim off the price on the farmer. Already happening with green energy.
Unfortunately, it is a simple calculation; say 20000 farmers, simply put (maybe there are more) compared to 18 million consumers. Who is going to help the government???
Subscriber
Southwest 27 January 2023
Think the farmer, supporting 20000 men is cheaper than 18 million, or did I not pay attention at school
Subscriber
CM 27 January 2023
Southwest wrote:
Think the farmer, supporting 20000 men is cheaper than 18 million, or did I not pay attention at school
Of course I can, but I'm afraid it doesn't work that way.
Pete 28 January 2023
This will be distributed among the population if there is resistance:

Before you know it you will lose each other
Pete 4 February 2023
CM can know it all:

We cannot solve a problem with the mindset that created it
Subscriber
CM 4 February 2023
Pete wrote:
CM can know it all:

We cannot solve a problem with the mindset that created it
Ha, the little I know is that politics is unreliable. Plus that the current and previous Rutte cabinets have made such a mess of it that they first have to clean up to come up with better solutions.
Subscriber
Joop 6 February 2023
And you're just coming here now? This has been known for over a year!!!! Why do you think we should stay 3 meters from the ditch side!
March 15 18 February 2023
Don't understand where all that child subsidy came from and our enslavement that followed for food, energy and another war with Russia once the last dissenter (trump) is off his seat.

This is what the democratic average mind of New Dutch people in 2023 says:
Think unlimited, before you know it you will lose each other.
Infinite growth is just back again, we're back to square one.

Now it appears that deforestation has started in the Amazon and we are giving our farmland away to hate cultures, I really have no words for it anymore.

farmers are ahead of their time or are the last to lose their minds
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up