Agriphoto

News Crop protection

Glyphosate authorized again for 10 years

16 November 2023 - Niels van der Boom - 10 comments

The license of the broad-spectrum herbicide glyphosate has been extended for ten years in the European Union. The European Commission decided to this effect on Thursday, November 16. The European member states were unable to reach a majority for admission or rejection of re-registration. The Commission therefore decides to re-register.

In mid-October there was also no majority for re-registration reached in Brussels. A new round of voting had the same result. Because all studies and information provided have shown that use of the drug is safe, the European Commission has decided that a ten-year re-registration is justified.

No majority
Despite the fact that large European member states such as Germany, France and Italy are not in favor of re-registration of the controversial herbicide, it was not possible to get a clear yes or no on the table in Brussels during the Scopaff consultation. At least fifteen of the member states must be unanimous in their response to reach a 65% majority. The European Commission therefore decides on the re-registration. As previously known, she is positive about the results of all studies.

In concrete terms, this means that agricultural entrepreneurs in the EU may use glyphosate, also known under the brand name RoundUp, until at least December 2033. The current registration expired in mid-December. Supporters are happy with the news. They cite the many studies (16.000!) that have shown time and time again that use of the drug is not harmful to humans, animals and nature. Glyphosate makes the use of non-inversion tillage and direct sowing much easier, which increases soil fertility and prevents erosion. Opponents point out that not enough research has been done into the long-term effects and previous claims that glyphosate can cause cancer and Parkinson's.

symbool
Glyphosate has come to symbolize the fight against chemical crop protection products worldwide, led by NGOs and others. The European Commission says in its decision that it is required by law to decide on the re-registration before the current period ends. Because no majority was reached, she opted for a ten-year re-registration. It relies on information provided by the food watchdog EFSA and the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). In addition, since 2019, the Assement Group on Glyphosate (AGG) has been working on assessing its safety and use. The Netherlands is one of the member states that is part of this group.

Can glyphosate proponents now breathe a sigh of relief? That is not entirely the case. Member states are ultimately responsible for registering active substances in their country. France, Germany and Austria, for example, previously announced that they would partially or completely ban the drug. In some countries this is already (partly) the case. Admission at European level does not necessarily mean that the drug is available.

Tightened requirements
The re-registration has some implications for the use of the drug compared to the current authorization. For example, glyphosate may no longer be used in so-called pre-harvest spraying. It also places responsibilities on the Member States, which must conduct their own research into risks to nature and the environment. The maximum permitted dose is also being examined more strictly. Member states must report the impact on biodiversity in their country to the Commission, which will have the necessary guidelines drawn up by EFSA.

Outgoing Agriculture Minister Piet Adema previously announced that he would abstain from voting, despite pressure from the House of Representatives to vote against. Adema stated in his explanation that if new research shows that the drug indeed poses a danger to public health, a ban should be imposed immediately. The Commission also endorses this in its ruling.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Niels van der Boom

Niels van der Boom is a senior market specialist for arable crops at DCA Market Intelligence. He mainly makes analyses and market updates about the potato market. In columns he shares his sharp view on the arable sector and technology.

More about

File Glyphosate
Comments
10 comments
Subscriber
sea ​​breeze 16 November 2023
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/akkerbouw/artikelen/10906831/glyphosate-again-for-10-years-to-accept]Glyphosate approved again for 10 years[/url]
Taking the matter seriously as a sector is an important signal to our citizens. Apply professionally and only where no alternative is reasonably possible. It is a shame that among scientists we know so many unscientific vilifiers with malversation behavior!
Subscriber
Maarten 17 November 2023
Zeewind what do you mean by malpractice behavior....? Does not make any sense. Whatever you think about glyphosate: whether or not it is the cause of Parkinson's, this herbicide is sprayed more every year. Nice and easy, everything dies, including insects, amphibians, micro-organisms that have to live from/on/between crops. The orange color of meadows (mono-ryegrasses) that have to be sprayed again and again is causing increasing annoyance in society. Couldn't there be less death spouts?
Excess is harmful. Those who want the best possible outcome will be spoiled for choice. I am certain: the more glyphosate is sprayed, the sooner the drug will be banned. That time could easily be close.

Subscriber
frog 17 November 2023
Martin wrote:
Zeewind what do you mean by malpractice behavior....? Does not make any sense. Whatever you think about glyphosate: whether or not it is the cause of Parkinson's, this herbicide is sprayed more every year. Nice and easy, everything dies, including insects, amphibians, micro-organisms that have to live from/on/between crops. The orange color of meadows (mono-ryegrasses) that have to be sprayed again and again is causing increasing annoyance in society. Couldn't there be less death spouts?
Excess is harmful. Those who want the best possible outcome will be spoiled for choice. I am certain: the more glyphosate is sprayed, the sooner the drug will be banned. That time could easily be close.

Maarten, if you know it so well, what about weeds burning through crops and potatoes?
Subscriber
January 17 November 2023
Why does this kill insects?
Arie poor branch. 17 November 2023
Jan, just put your hand under a burner, then you will know.
Subscriber
Drent 17 November 2023
Martin wrote:
Zeewind what do you mean by malpractice behavior....? Does not make any sense. Whatever you think about glyphosate: whether or not it is the cause of Parkinson's, this herbicide is sprayed more every year. Nice and easy, everything dies, including insects, amphibians, micro-organisms that have to live from/on/between crops. The orange color of meadows (mono-ryegrasses) that have to be sprayed again and again is causing increasing annoyance in society. Couldn't there be less death spouts?
Excess is harmful. Those who want the best possible outcome will be spoiled for choice. I am certain: the more glyphosate is sprayed, the sooner the drug will be banned. That time could easily be close.

Due to all kinds of government obligations, glyphosate is indeed being used more and more. If there are fewer regulations, the amount of glyphosate will also decrease.
Subscriber
Maarten 17 November 2023
May it be a little less Drent. If there is a restriction on glyphosate, this will apply to grassland. It is of course strange to spray ryegrass to death and then sow ryegrass again. Redundant!
Subscriber
time bomb 18 November 2023
Martin wrote:
May it be a little less Drent. If there is a restriction on glyphosate, this will apply to grassland. It is of course strange to spray ryegrass to death and then sow ryegrass again. Redundant!
Why unnecessary? If the chosen variety is not good enough for a meadow and it has been sown, it must first germinate and grow a bit. Then add glyphosate on top, and you're as good as free from the variety you didn't want. Hence. This also applies to grass seed cultivation. It is harvested every 1,2 or 3 years. So if that variety does not suit you and you want a different variety, the same applies here. In both cases it is about harvesting a crop that you want. It is often a major problem to get rid of the storage of a variety that you no longer want.
Breed purity is of utmost importance in both cases.
Subscriber
frog 18 November 2023
frog wrote:
Martin wrote:
Zeewind what do you mean by malpractice behavior....? Does not make any sense. Whatever you think about glyphosate: whether or not it is the cause of Parkinson's, this herbicide is sprayed more every year. Nice and easy, everything dies, including insects, amphibians, micro-organisms that have to live from/on/between crops. The orange color of meadows (mono-ryegrasses) that have to be sprayed again and again is causing increasing annoyance in society. Couldn't there be less death spouts?
Excess is harmful. Those who want the best possible outcome will be spoiled for choice. I am certain: the more glyphosate is sprayed, the sooner the drug will be banned. That time could easily be close.

Maarten, if you know it so well, what about weeds burning through crops and potatoes?
Well Maarten?
real grower 18 November 2023
simply cannot do without this drug.
after all, the best thing for the environment / grower / soil life / and emissions. so everyone is upset now. The citizen should shut his mouth and first look after himself, keep the driveway clean with vinegar, what do you mean, meddle...
this is the big mess that has salt in it that destroys everything.
roundup only gives yellow discoloration, otherwise nothing dead point
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Arable

Concerns over glyphosate resistance in England

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register