Sector interest comes first

Van Dam will appeal

12 May 2017 - Esther de Snoo - 13 comments

Martijn van Dam, outgoing State Secretary, will appeal against the judge's judgment regarding the Phosphate Reduction Regulation 2017. He asks the Court to agree to emergency treatment. This must be before June 1.

Op May 4, the judge ruled in favor of a group of dairy farmers who had instituted summary proceedings because of the Phosphate Reduction Regulation 2017. The judge ruled in their favor, as a result of which the regulation has been partially suspended.

disputable
Van Dam believes that the judge has ruled too broadly and will appeal against the ruling. He writes that in Friday a letter to the House of Representatives. 'The judgment of the preliminary relief judge that the regulation is disproportionate for the claimant dairy farmers is open to question,' writes Van Dam.

He believes that all dairy farmers, as well as those who initiated summary proceedings, could have foreseen the settlement. 'In addition, in my view the scheme was foreseeable for all dairy farmers, including the claimants,' says Van Dam.

Uncertainty
He recognizes that this creates uncertainty for the dairy farmers involved, but he considers the success of the scheme more important. Van Dam: 'It is this interest that prevails over the uncertainty that will arise for the companies involved as a result of the appeal.' 
He wants to submit the appeal via an urgent procedure so as not to let the lack of clarity last unnecessarily long. He must have permission from the Court to do this. As long as the outcome of the appeal is unknown, the group of dairy farmers will not have to reject any livestock. 

Sector interest comes first
The State Secretary emphasizes that it is in the interest of the sector that the reduction in the number of cows in 2017 is sufficient if the Netherlands is to be eligible for the derogation and to be able to enter into discussions with the EU about the implementation of the sixth Nitrates Directive action programme. He sees the judge's ruling as a danger to the success of the Scheme. 'The production ceiling that the Netherlands has to adhere to does not provide a special position for specific companies.'

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
13 comments
leo 12 May 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl// artikel/10874504/van-dam-gaat-in-hoger-beroep-in-phosphatezaak][/url]
he may not pay the costs out of his own pocket
mores 12 May 2017
According to the Government LTO and RFC there was still 20-30% room to expand after the end of the Quotation.
These 3 parties have passionately argued in Brussels for the end of the quota because the Dutch dairy farmers had to be able to grow!!!! to say that everything was foreseeable is very hypocritical.
Mart 12 May 2017
Leo, I don't think he's paying out of his own pocket.
His arguments are very weak. He can sense in his clogs that he will never win the appeal.
Van Dam flew long before the decision was made in the appeal.
So it's good to stretch some time, at least he doesn't have to clean up the chaos anymore.
It's also easy to always hide behind the 'sector parties'. I think this is no longer a reflection of dairy farming in the Netherlands.
It is a pity that the VVD, CDA, D66 and SGP, let Van Dam do his thing. Looks like they're letting him have his way so they don't have to burn their hands on this mess themselves.
Bram 13 May 2017
It is to be hoped that such a guy as Bleeker will once again lead agriculture from The Hague.
Then there will be decent rules. People like van Dam don't know and don't feel what farming life is all about.
Bob 13 May 2017
I hope that July 2, 2015 continues to exist for everyone
So no exception
So no exceptional cases either
Ik 13 May 2017
I hope that the entire derogation will be removed. Will the manure processing finally start
Karel 13 May 2017
I believe (I) don't know what he's talking about
Derogation off means at least 20% reduction of the entire livestock farming
not 13 May 2017
Karel, that's better than 50% now in some cases. Is that reasonable?
Karel 13 May 2017
not,
It's not that bad
Those who could buy milk quotas can also buy phosphate rights
It would be a shame that some get it for free and that on the back of farmers who have not expanded.
It is feasible for an extensive farmer, an intensive farmer just has to become something extensive
blackberry 13 May 2017
hey karel you can also understand that handing in 50% costs someone the head without more
pigskin 13 May 2017
bram: that's not too bad that grower who has to surrender 50% doesn't just drop the bank............ someone without debt does not get euros to top up the generic discount..... ....... who are urgently advised to stop.......... . see pig rights file. so go for the lowest possible generic discount with as few pinch points as possible!
Ik 14 May 2017
@Karel Knows very well what I'm talking about. Why should we pay for something that again does not participate. Don't know whether your detonation farmers pay our mortgage? We have arranged our manure affairs well and pr
Ik 14 May 2017
You can compare it with. I buy a new tractor without GPS, but I have to pay for it. that d
Ik 14 May 2017
You don't either.jQuery21107493373129728_1494742325486
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register