5 questions for Joris Baecke

'In 13 years, arable farming must be emission-free'

9 July 2017 - Bart-Jan van Zandwijk - 16 comments

In 2030, the Dutch vegetable sectors will be an international leader in the field of quality and sustainability. At least if LTO Nederland achieves the goal it has set itself.

At the beginning of this week, LTO presented the Ambition Plant Health 2030: Healthy cultivation, healthy future. In it, the stand organization argues for further development of the worldwide leading position of the Netherlands when it comes to healthy cultivation. Joris Baecke, Plant Health portfolio holder at LTO Nederland, is very hopeful about the ambition.

What does LTO want to achieve with the 2030 ambition for plant health?
"The ambition is to make the Dutch vegetable sector an undisputed leader in the field of quality and sustainability by 2030. Sustainability is an eroded concept. I prefer to describe it as sustainability. This means that it is a good product financially and ecologically. We want to achieve not only quality, but also sustainability."

The ambition poses 3 challenging tasks:

  • Healthy Plant: Crops that will be sturdy in 2030 and can take a beating. These plants hardly need to be adjusted during cultivation. This requires resilient plants that are less susceptible to diseases and pests.
  • Healthy living environment: In 2030, the cultivation of food will contribute to a healthy living environment for humans and animals. Low emissions, healthy soil and increased biodiversity.
  • Healthy market: In 2030, the Dutch product will be known as a strong brand. There is an increasing demand for sustainable products. The share of this on the shelves is growing.

Emission-free and residue-free cultivation is the goal. Are we not increasingly being pushed in that direction, because fewer and fewer resources are allowed to be used? "What we want does not necessarily mean getting rid of crop protection products. Our goal is to have no more emissions to ground and surface water by 2030. The goal is to develop a strong plant and a good soil life. With a strong resilient plant, crop protection products are need less.”

Aren't we already doing quite well as a sector? What do you think should be done in concrete terms?
"We are now reaching the limits of the current production. Look at the developments in the climate. Diseases and pests can develop better due to the heat. We want to move towards a crop with resilient plants and good soil fertility. measure with the 'Resilience Indicator' that is yet to be developed. As the Netherlands, we are where we are now. We have a leading position in the world. That is our strength from which we can continue."

With a strong resilient plant, crop protection agents are automatically needed less

And bottlenecks? They are certainly there in this ambition. 
"I see the availability of green crop protection products as a bottleneck. The cooperation of other parties, such as government and research, is also necessary for the success of this ambition."

Critics fear that the plan will make the cost price too high compared to neighboring countries. Do they have a point?
"It depends on the market for which they are grown. If growers can distinguish themselves, it opens up markets that can cover the additional costs. The market for sustainable products is growing. If we only have to rely on the cost price of the end product, we cannot compete. The primary condition is that entrepreneurs can distinguish themselves in the market through quality, the production process and more attention to the living environment. We can distinguish ourselves with this. And if anyone can do it, then it is the Netherlands!"

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
16 comments
Tel 9 July 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl// artikel/10875100/over-13-jaar-moet-akkerbouw-emissievrij-zijn][/url]
Where does Dutch agriculture differ from the good arable areas in the rest of the world..?? I don't see it..Wherever you go, they work with the same varieties, have to deal with strict approvals, etc. etc. Stronger plants and less chemistry are on the wish lists everywhere. It's about creating added value..and LTO has proven that it has not had any luck with that..In fact, we are not there thanks to LTO, but despite LTO..
roy 9 July 2017
it sounds like organic farming. there is not enough market for this and such targets are an indirect signal to conventional cultivation that they are not doing well. thus unworthy of advocacy.
old farmer 9 July 2017
Quite true, for the umpteenth time this week they showed again that they are behind the times in Brabant. CDA LTO have always wanted to save the goat and the cabbage and opted for the average constituency. This has led to, among other things, an unbalanced agricultural structure in the Netherlands, which is now being settled with, among other things, the phosphate monstrosity. With mediocrity we only got an even bigger knockout race and the frontrunners in all sectors continue to develop their companies in all respects or are already abroad. They have long ceased to be members of Lto or are no longer attracted to it. Frontrunners have also never been welcomed administratively and therefore dropped out and now the mediocrity is falling through the ice.
old farmer 2 9 July 2017
old farmer wrote:
Quite true, for the umpteenth time this week they showed again that they are behind the times in Brabant. CDA LTO have always wanted to save the goat and the cabbage and opted for the average constituency. This has led to, among other things, an unbalanced agricultural structure in the Netherlands, which is now being settled with, among other things, the phosphate monstrosity. With mediocrity we only got an even bigger knockout race and the frontrunners in all sectors continue to develop their companies in all respects or are already abroad. They have long ceased to be members of Lto or are no longer attracted to it. Frontrunners have also never been welcomed administratively and therefore dropped out and now the mediocrity is falling through the ice.

Totally agree! Hit the nail on the head!
They no longer know what defense of interests is, only consulting and giving away interests is now the motto.
Leonardo lll 9 July 2017
Advocacy is different from sowing division. Look at Brabant what happens to you if you lead the way. Create support for the systems we have. The antipathy against this is mainly based on ignorance and left-wing ideological ideas, which are fed by the need to maintain a certain political movement.
January 9 July 2017
Plants are becoming much weaker, we now have to treat sugar beets several times against leaf fungi, and treating potatoes against altenaria was not necessary 15 years ago either.
Phytofthora and yellow rust fungi were also less persistent
Tel 9 July 2017
It's the umpteenth diversion, the umpteenth sausage being held out. As old as I am, it is said that the world population is growing faster than food production. The opposite is true. Russia is becoming an export country instead of an import. Eastern bloc countries are crowding out western European production. Areas with low-balancing agriculture must return to nature and production where it is the least burdensome, i.e. the good arable areas. Agriculture can and will no longer make the disadvantaged areas liveable to hold. Those are the choices that need to be made in Europe. Stop with subsidies that are supposedly for the farmer but actually have the aim of overproduction and rural maintenance.
arborist 9 July 2017
Been spraying with biological agents for years, right time, etc. I see little difference with less use of pesticides.
Yes, less spraying and less growth is also a possibility.
Is that the new frontrunners goal. But I won't do it right
arborist 9 July 2017
With regard to Until Jan plants are getting weaker, that is the same story in tree cultivation, crops that used to be free of mildew and leaf spot diseases, etc. 15 years ago, and now they do.
In my opinion, such agreements only make it more difficult than it already is.
sand farmer 11 July 2017
Or not. With all the chemistry and fertilizer it doesn't really get along. More and more often get the feeling that plant weakening is caused by this. And not because we give less fertilizer, but because we know very little about biology anymore. And that's not the same as organic farming, but maybe in between. Now the plant is immediately susceptible with every change of wash, because we almost blow them up.
environmentalist 11 July 2017
We urgently need to go back to the parathion era, all means of that time working properly and immediately without building up resistance. Much better than the weak infusions of today without active and active substances. At the time, there was still a large game population and ditches full of eel and pike, so it wasn't that bad
Subscriber
Free Agria 11 July 2017
environmentalist wrote:
We urgently need to go back to the parathion era, all means of that time working properly and immediately without building up resistance. Much better than the weak infusions of today without active and active substances. At the time, there was still a large game population and ditches full of eel and pike, so it wasn't that bad


Until it penetrated into soil and surface water....
environmentalist 11 July 2017
A dirty environment is talked to you by the left-wing lobby because there is always a molecule found somewhere on 1000 ha
Matt 11 July 2017
That's what happens when you choose a prominent PvdA member as LTO foreman.
On whose behalf does LTO actually speak here?
In any case, I don't feel represented.
lie 11 July 2017
lto is destroying everything with this come on for the sector and make it clear that we are already good as it is now and this is already the border but no, it has to be more like another country. everything must be broken in this way it is not more workable..
Subscriber
crow 12 July 2017
Goat wool socks story, this will never work without GMO and CRISPR-Cas.
Annemarie 13 July 2017
That's right, zero emissions in 2030 can only be achieved if these new breeding techniques are introduced. And growers are given more room for customization in their cultivation system. It would also help if the chain asks for robust varieties instead of (only) the highest yield or the most beautiful color, NGOs focus on connection instead of polarization, and the industry is pushing the development of alternatives for all those resources that will disappear in the coming years ( or already are). It's all in the ambition. Ever read?
www.lto.nl/GezondeteeltGezondetoekomst
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register