By Australian farmers

Making money with carbon bonding

15 August 2017 - Niels van der Boom - 1 reaction

For the first time in the world, farmers in Australia are paid when they manage to bind carbon in the soil. The government makes several funds available for this. Agricultural entrepreneurs, who participate, hope to tap into a new source of income.

Farmers in the Australian states of South Australia and Victoria can receive money through a new subsidy scheme from the Australian government when they fix carbon in their farmland. A group of farmers has won subsidies for this, writes ABC News.

The government recognizes that our soil can bind carbon

Symbol policy
One of the farmers participating in the project, Steven Hobbs, calls the subsidy scheme to reduce emissions symbolic. "But, a little symbolism is better than doing nothing at all," he says. "Unfortunately, the government has a lot of double standards. It is a step in the right direction that the government recognizes that our farmland has the potential to bind carbon."

10 years of carbon binding
The ERF (Emissions Reduction Fund) subsidy scheme is an 'auction' open to farmers and landowners to fund projects such as carbon fixation. This subsidy scheme is already active within pig farming to reduce methane gas emissions. Participants in the ERF fund are paid approximately 10 Australian dollars per carbon credit. Converted €6,67 per credit. The credit is based on the carbon-binding capacity of their land over a 10-year period.

Unique project
The money is intended to encourage farmers to carry out restorative work on their farms and to bind carbon to the soil. According to the Australians, it is the first time worldwide that money has been paid for this. Over the years, the agricultural sector has emitted a lot of CO2, due to carbon losses. This process should now be reversed. Other countries are following the Australian project with interest.

10

dollar

the farmers get paid, but that's too little

Price too low
According to Louisa Kiely, of the organization Carbon Farmers Australia, the $10 per credit is too low. “In addition to carbon binding, carbon sequestration also has the benefit of making food healthier and soil more fertile,” Kiely says. "Despite the low price, it is important that farmers participate in the project. As carbon sequestration evolves, it can be migrated to the private sector and sold by agricultural entrepreneurs." Hobbs also hopes that in the future farmers will be able to act locally or internationally in reducing emissions through carbon binding.

Potential in the Netherlands
Research Institute Alterra treasure This means that the total stock of carbon in Dutch soil amounts to 357 million tons. Theoretically, it is possible to reduce 5 million tons of CO2 through measures in agriculture. It concluded that after a study in 2013. Measures that could be taken include no plowing, better rotations, more supply of extra carbon and better water management. The total net CO2 emissions of Dutch agriculture are around 0, Alterra writes.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Niels van der Boom

Niels van der Boom is a senior market specialist for arable crops at DCA Market Intelligence. He mainly makes analyses and market updates about the potato market. In columns he shares his sharp view on the arable sector and technology.
Comments
1 reaction
Jan 16 August 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl// artikel/10875551/geld-earning-met-koolstofbinding][/url]
More carbon (=energy) in the soil is good for the development and maintenance of soil life. That is worth more than the subsidies and with that we build better future possibilities. The Alterra calculation, like other political activity, focuses on CO2, because that would be the instigator of climate change. That's just the question, a question that shouldn't even be asked.
Large-scale, irreversible methane emissions are difficult to tackle and, like other causes of climate change, are kept out of the political and investment picture.
The fact that we can and must move to a more frugal lifestyle (less transport and travel, less energy for heating and cooling) also remains outside the picture and agreements. What are people doing and how can we be misled?
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Nitrogen

SSC fully opposes Brabant's stable policy

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up