Get rid of income support

Van Dam wants to use GLB money for calamities

29 August 2017 - Bart-Jan van Zandwijk - 17 comments

Risk management in the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is the main topic of the Agricultural Council. It will be held from September 3 to 5. Van Dam supports Estonia's proposal to finance calamities, such as the fipronil crisis, with CAP money. State Secretary Martijn van Dam wrote this in a letter to the House of Representatives on 28 August.

Estonia, the presidency country, wants money to be set aside within the CAP for agricultural crises. Part of the budget must therefore be converted into an amount that is paid out when a crisis measure is required. The new CAP system should come into effect in 2021. 

Farmer must take risk measures himself
President Estonia points out the importance of risk management measures to prevent negative effects on the farmer's income. This includes strong fluctuations in the selling prices of products on the market.

Farmers must take measures themselves to reduce the risks

The effects of climate change also play a role. Farmers are increasingly confronted with this. These calamities can be subdivided into product risks (quantity and quality) and price risks.

Current continuation not desirable
Van Dam appreciates Estonia's initiative to discuss the role of risk management in the future CAP. He argues that agricultural entrepreneurs must take measures themselves to reduce the risks. One can think of prevention, trading on the futures market or various insurance policies. The CAP has already contributed to the wider use of broad weather insurance.

Van Dam considers it undesirable to continue the current CAP payments to farmers. He wants to get rid of direct income support and instead wants a system of rewards for farmers who put in extra effort, for example with greening and sustainability.

Land prices higher and higher
He supports Estonia's proposal to convert direct payment to risk management. According to Martijn van Dam, the current CAP system is leading to higher and higher land prices. This hinders young farmers from growing in their business.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
17 comments
Subscriber
Glass 29 August 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melkvee/ artikel/10875700/van-dam-wil-met-glb-geld-calamiteiten-payment][/url]
Very sensible, too bad that the premiums from the past are already discounted in the land prices. It is therefore desirable that this transition can be spread out over a number of years. It would also be desirable for the agricultural lobby to focus on properly setting up sector committees that must ensure a fair and adequate policy in this regard.
farmer 29 August 2017
Finally a statement from Van Dam that I actually agree with!
Gerrit 29 August 2017
So Van Dam wants damage caused by other sectors to be compensated with agricultural money, which makes a stupid statement that guy again surprises you with his decision
Wiljo 29 August 2017
Fortunately, we can conclude from the words of Van Dam that fipronil damage must be compensated. But why should the damage largely caused by NVWA's laxity have to be paid for by agricultural sectors that have nothing to do with this.
This is a loss item that must be compensated by the government.
John 29 August 2017
In my opinion, the CAP money is intended to guarantee the production of sufficient amounts, not to maintain the backyard of the backyard. taxes and higher food prices.
Agri 29 August 2017
Can't we use the cap funds to retire van dam
the rest 29 August 2017
He just doesn't want to farm anymore!
Ton Westgeest 29 August 2017
In principle I can agree, but this man cannot be trusted at all..... Where have the crisis funds gone? Has anyone had any of this? I'm not looking forward to it at all. But this NPO man, who has long since cashed in on his future, just like Veerman did, by the way, still has the crisis money in cash and could now support the chicken farmers with it.... But that's not the plan at all, sir. You can see that he is not interested in that at all. He only wants to apply the cap also in his jar...... more power! Don't think he cares about a farmer, he has been appointed just like then Brinkman, to reduce the peasantry!
Ton Westgeest 29 August 2017
mistake thanks .... no Brinkman, must be Brinkhorst.
if 30 August 2017
Their problem suddenly becomes your problem while the last group has nothing to do with it. It's too short for me.
Gerrit 30 August 2017
The word Calamity is an indication for (natural) disaster or an unexpected event.
The government must have a contingency plan ready for this, it does not state that this is reimbursed with GLB money
So the fipronil does not fall under this, so here are the damage stories with the causer or responsible authority
Pete 30 August 2017
Land prices are skyrocketing here because an enormous amount of land has been expropriated for industry and on top of that it is the bosses of the factories who buy the land. For the farmers 100000 euros is too much
Skirt 30 August 2017
Nice for the people who can afford it, however, has nothing to do with agriculture.
josef 30 August 2017
Again this cry again; Politicians are like a couple of pigeons: when they sit on the ground they eat out of your hand and when they fly in the air they shit you on your head !!!!
nn 31 August 2017
The biggest disaster is a low market price due to sufficient food. If enough is produced by agriculture to allow everyone to live in prosperity, we need support.
Subscriber
erik 31 August 2017
let him use this money to support insurance premiums and abolish the insurance tax, then you are confused
jacob 31 August 2017
nvwa made a mistake so sit on the blisters and dock. don't shift money from another sector you make a big mess of everything must be destroyed in this way .go support agriculture instead of letting everything suffocate
geert 2 September 2017
NVWA does not reimburse anything, the farmers can whistle at it, and politics does not grant the farmers a cent either, they prefer to fill their own pockets
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Background GLB

Should large farmers get subsidies or not?

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up