EU ban real

France votes against glyphosate authorization

31 August 2017 - Clarisse van der Woude - 13 comments

France will vote against the re-authorization of the herbicide glyphosate. Doubts about the drug's risks to human health are the reason for this. This was announced by an official of the French Ministry of the Environment.

France's position allows the country to block the re-admission of glyphosate into the European Union (EU) for 10 years. The vote on the renewal of the admission is on October 4.

Without France, there is a real chance that the admission will not be renewed

Re-admission requires a majority of EU member states, but without France there is a real chance that the admission will not be renewed. France and Germany abstained in previous rounds of voting.

Farming disapproving
French farmers disapprove of the decision, saying it will mean the end of glyphosate use. "Until alternative solutions are available, a glyphosate ban will put aside farmers' years of research and development efforts," said the French Union of Farmers, FNSEA.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
13 comments
Skirt 31 August 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl// artikel/10875721/frankrijk-stemt-tegen-toelating-glyphosate][/url]
Can we also add, let's ban agriculture as well, then we will immediately get rid of those rotten farmers.
Subscriber
smart ass 31 August 2017
bet that those French farmers will get it done again [luckily]
call 31 August 2017
The US and co are apparently good at lobbying, but will supply what we are no longer able to do.
CORRUPTION & BAG FILLING
Frenchman 31 August 2017
Yet another political decision by Macron, without a solid foundation, to please the ecolobby.
Francois 31 August 2017
So says a French environmental official. so what???
nn 31 August 2017
No problem. All countries where glyphosate is used are no longer allowed to import food or animal feed into Europe.
Just like those copper tubers that are sold "without poison" in the supermarket. Destroy that trade.
Skirt 1 September 2017
It is an illusion to think that importing products grown with glyphosate will be banned, for example Canada can continue to export to the EU because they have a trade agreement.
Subscriber
Skirt 1 September 2017
Oh yes, Ukraine has also been allowed to dump massively in the EU since last year.
Jan 5 September 2017
@Kjol Dan, because of the level play field, the import of material from Canada and Ukraine will also be stopped. just like with GMO products. Does that make you satisfied?
Be interested in the harmful effects of glyphosate that have been obscured for decades by, indeed, effective lobbying and for which the producer is not accountable... because it was graciously approved by the defrauded authorities. Would you like to know what the effect of glyphosate is on soil life?
Willem 5 September 2017
Dear Jan, The effect of 4 liters of Roundup on soil life is only 16 points according to CLM environmental benchmark. it is therefore well within the 0-100 range of non-impressive.
Fortunately, your reasoning that Roundup is so bad for soil life does not hold.
Calculate this yourself on:
http://www.milieumeetlat.nl/nl/bereken-open-teelt.html
peer 5 September 2017
thinks that it is very easy to spray with roundup eg spraying grass and after 5 days of feeding cattle and pre-harvest in grain is not necessary and if we in Europe are no longer allowed to use it. that the stuff that enters the eu must also be free of that stuff
Jan 6 September 2017
@Willem. On what data does CLM base its standards? CLM receives this from the producer, who has presented half-truths to the authorities in the US and therefore also here.
Look further and be critical of use.
There are farmers who use a Roundup spray as part of seedbed preparation. Or to spray the green manure in full fields.
Yes you can, but given the effects that other sources report, you can't be surprised about the political/public resistance to drugs. Especially not if the sector manages to train a ban for years (neonicotinoids and also other substances). That doesn't inspire confidence. The very harmful consequences of this can be seen in the hysteria surrounding fipronil, as an example.
The condition of the soil life (that is more than worms) is worrying, isn't it? Is only mechanical stress the cause? Could the mechanism of action of glyphosate not be the cause of this? If you know you can say it; Blindly relying on CLM is not wise and shows laziness, in this case well-understood self-interest.
nn 11 September 2017
Spray copper, poison is very toxic to soil life. But we call it fertilization. And we sell it as unsprayed organic. That inspires confidence.
Subscriber
real story 11 September 2017
@Jan

i think r. up is a great tool if you use it wisely. You may wonder whether preharvest or over crops (as in the states) is a useful application, but otherwise, as most farmers in Europe use it, it is an excellent tool.

jan call me is 3 studies, peer reviewed, reproducible and not later withdrawn (seralini) that your claims regarding. support soil life. I'd like to read them because I can't find them.

as far as i can see the whole smear campaign is against r. up is the result of the fight against GMOs that a whole group of people (NGOs in europe and politics) is very busy with. r. up = monsanto monsanto ="dangerous" gmos this is the reasoning and this is the story and nothing else as far as i can see

but I would like to see the contrary proven because I also do not want to use products that have been shown to be dangerous for humans, animals or the environment under normal use.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Arable

Concerns over glyphosate resistance in England

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register