It appears from the coalition agreement

Methane reduction has priority in Rutte III

10 October 2017 - Wouter Baan - 22 comments

The coalition agreement of the Rutte III cabinet, presented today, Tuesday 10 October, states that methane emissions must be reduced. In terms of emission reduction, the new cabinet will sail closer to the wind than prescribed by the European Union.

The new cabinet sees it as a duty to follow the climate agreement. This agreement states that a temperature increase may not exceed 1,5 degrees Celsius. To comply with this, the European Union aims for a 40% reduction in greenhouse gases by 2030. The new cabinet is raising the bar above the guidelines from Brussels and is aiming for a halving (49%).

No volume limiting measures 

Reduction in agriculture
In total, the new cabinet wants to achieve a reduction of around 2030 million tons of greenhouse gas by 55, of which 3,5 million tons from agriculture. Among other things, by reducing methane emissions (1 million tons), smarter land use (1,5 million tons) and using the greenhouse as an energy source (1 million tons). Technical measures, such as manure processing and food mix, are preferable to volume-limiting measures. 

Extra solar energy and biofuels are stimulating measures that the government has in mind. The agreements will be anchored in a new climate and energy agreement.  

Budget of €4 billion 
The new cabinet is also aiming for extra wind at sea, electric cars and climate-neutral construction. In addition, the coal-fired power stations must be closed by 2030 at the latest. The Rutte III cabinet does say that the measures should under no circumstances harm the Dutch competitive position. On balance, the government is making almost €4 billion available for climate and energy transitions.

View the other messages about the coalition agreement here.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is Head of Meat & Dairy at BoerenbusinessAt DCA Market Intelligence, he focuses on dairy, pork, and meat markets. He also monitors (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
22 comments
john 10 October 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl// artikel/10876147/methane reduction-has-priority-in-rutte-iii][/url]
And that is also the reason why no pig rights go to dairy farming.. fortunately a warm remediation for the enthusiasts.
Bertie 10 October 2017
Don't praise the day before evening becomes John.
down below 10 October 2017
Bertje and then the day has to start again!
Bas 10 October 2017
I read in the agreement: warm remediation of pigs
Farming in North Brabant in particular :(((
flaming 10 October 2017
fewer cows and start eating grass yourself
Skirt 10 October 2017
Drowning in hot water
Ton Westgeest 10 October 2017
This is yet another missed opportunity for the agricultural sector. Nobody manages to put livestock farming in a good light. They stumble over each other to be the most sustainable, but no one can tell how well we are doing.
We have solar panels, we feed the cows from residual flows from the consumption industry. Beer grain/waste from the beer industry, all kinds of potato waste from the fries and potato industry, pressed waste cake from the palm oil and linseed industry, the hulls/husks of the soybeans, waste from the maize industry, so-called maize gluten, etc. As an agricultural sector, we have an important task alone as a waste processor. What would be an extra CO2 in the air if there were no agricultural sector. I think that we as a sector are already CO2 neutral, just do the math!!!
Now a new man joins the LTO... the first thing he says is "we are going to fight for methane reduction"! What a mind!%$#@$%^&* Then it is logical that such a hopeless new cabinet immediately cuts down on it!
Skirt 11 October 2017
Agriculture will be abused to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reduce CO2 emissions in the industry, etc. where many people work in unfeasible since these companies then leave due to too high costs. Taxing CO2 emissions more heavily will not happen either, then this would have to be done internationally, but many countries are already withdrawing from the Kyoto agreement. The agricultural sector must now be very careful that we are not tricked with a nice story. The Minister of Climate can still surprise us strangely.
Skirt 11 October 2017
Now that this has long been clear internally to the forming parties, I also understand why it is undesirable for them to put a minister of agriculture to work, that would only have an obstructive effect.
Subscriber
erik 11 October 2017
Don't forget that methane is 15 to 20 times more harmful than CO2. Cows are champions of methane emissions, let's just forget that for the sake of convenience? I've had enough rainfall lately and I do believe in climate change and think we should do a lot to not make it (even) worse
Subscriber
smart ass 11 October 2017
and next year dry summer!
it's always different than they think
Subscriber
erik 11 October 2017
ever heard of ostrich politics, know-it-all?
With your head in the sand they will bite you in the ass! You definitely didn't see that coming!!
Skirt 11 October 2017
Erik you are right about methane emissions in livestock farming, significantly reducing emissions in this area is the cheapest solution for politicians. However, the farmers will be faced with high costs and will have nowhere to go.
Subscriber
erik 11 October 2017
so you shouldn't want to run away from your problems. And like everyone else, the government can only spend each euro once. What I think is a major missed opportunity is that aviation (holidays!!) and shipping will again be sidelined and will not have to take their responsibility
Subscriber
Dago 11 October 2017
erik wrote:
ever heard of ostrich politics, know-it-all?
With your head in the sand they will bite you in the ass! You definitely didn't see that coming!!



It's always nice to get this kind of reaction, if you don't agree with the climate story, you're engaging in ostrich politics, what nonsense. In your own story there is no substantiation, only that you believe something.
flaming 11 October 2017
Methane does not occur in high concentrations Erik but is indeed a strong greenhouse gas.
As a result, it is responsible for about 15% of global warming.
But methane is also emitted during the extraction of petroleum and natural gas, and a lot of methane is also released during rice cultivation.
What is not taken into account, however, is that cattle eat grass and that grass cultivation ensures that an enormous amount of co² is captured.
45% of the world's agricultural area is grass,
no cows = eat grass

If you want to help the climate you have to tackle fossil fuels, everything else has a false feeling.
Like, I'm less into meat and milk, but I'll keep driving and flying. = climate continues to deteriorate
Skirt 11 October 2017
The way Erik thinks is similar to how many in The Hague and beyond view agriculture. Unintentionally and without conscious awareness, agriculture is accused of causing a major problem and of having to solve it under threat of everything. In this way, industry, aviation and everything that the public feels more comfortable with are again spared. Environmental organizations fully support this with a very shrewd way of making propaganda and the easy LTO blows with all winds and tries to stay friends with everyone in a, we think along, with everyone.
Skirt 11 October 2017
I especially wish the livestock industry a lot of strength in the coming term of office. A warned person counts for two!
Subscriber
erik 11 October 2017
Perhaps more farmers should also look over the fence and not always point at others. First see what you can do yourself and then point it out to someone else.
methane scientist 11 October 2017
Almost 100% of methane is released from nature through the digestion of plant remains and leaves. And the ministers are being falsely informed by the environmental lobby. What happens to a car air conditioner and a refrigerator in Africa, for example, at the end of their life?
flaming 11 October 2017
Erik

Here in Flanders, according to the Flemish environmental company, livestock farming is responsible for 5% of greenhouse gas emissions, 3.5% meat (beef, pork and chicken) and 1.5% milk.
so only focusing on agriculture like you and many others certainly does not benefit the climate, just gives a false feeling.

Instead of going along with the herd of naiveties, take a look at the facts.
Subscriber
erik 11 October 2017
I would only point to others if you are already doing well yourself, no matter how big or small your contribution is. But apparently people don't want to hear that here, and it's always somewhere else. Well good luck with it
Ton Westgeest 11 October 2017
"methane is 15 to 20 times more harmful than CO2. Cows are champions of methane emissions,"

If you're so obsessed with cows Erik and you don't want to see that there are tons of other, worse champions of greenhouse gas causes then we should abolish cow grazing altogether. The cows with a calculated ration all year round emit much less methane than the cows that walk outside (perhaps a thing for the new cabinet, cows all go inside!).
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up