License for 3 or 5 years

Germany and France determine fate of glyphosate

23 October 2017 - Niels van der Boom - 6 comments

If it is up to France and Germany, farmers will have another 3 to 5 years to get used to a method that does not use glyphosate. The French Minister of Ecology made a clear statement in the press. Germany shares that view. The 2 countries can make or break a license.

The situation for the relicensing of glyphosate looks bleak. Emotions run high in the debate. Environmental organizations prefer to see the herbicide disappear immediately. Agricultural entrepreneurs and advocates preach the story that, with the help of glyphosate, considerably less tillage has to be carried out. This has numerous benefits for people and the environment. European politics has the last say. Their opinion is becoming clearer.

Emotions in the glyphosate debate are running high

Environment Committee is clear
On Thursday 19 October voted the European Parliament (EP) Committee on the Environment is already against an extension of 5 or 10 years. They argue for an extension until 2021; 39 votes were in favour, 9 against and 10 abstained. The European Commission (EC) will vote on an admission on Wednesday 25 October. In contrast to the environmental committee, they do have binding force.

3, 5 or 7 years
More than 12 Member States are in favor of a renewal of the glyphosate license in the EU. However, Germany and France represent the largest group of Europeans. As a result, their opinions outweigh those of the Netherlands or Denmark. In an interview on the French radio station RTL Nicolas Hulot, Minister of Ecology, stated that an extension for 3 to 5 years is feasible. He uses 5 as the maximum. According to him, 3 years is also sufficient. In the meantime, the sector can explore alternatives. French agriculture minister Stéphane Travert is in favor of an extension for 5 to 7 years.

2-3

year

gets glyphosate from Germany

German politics
According to the German newspaper Tagesspiegel, the German opinion is in line with that of France. Agriculture Minister Christian Schmidt is in favor of an extension of 2 to 3 years. The German position is currently being discussed within the German Ministries for Economy and Environment. In addition, our eastern neighbors have to deal with the 'greens' in their new parliament. They are candidates for the ministerial post that deals with the environment. When they come to power, a completely different wind will blow in national German politics.

Battle not fought
Next Wednesday, October 25, a clear yes or no should be heard. If this does not happen, the license will be extended by 10 years by the European Commission. 16 Member States are not expected to give a clear judgment. Accounting for 65% of the European population and 12 have already spoken out.

A hard yes or no from France and Germany can give a different outcome. If there is not an overwhelming majority, the Commission takes its own decision. EU Commissioner Vytenis Andriukaitis is clear about that. Security for 10 years is therefore still a possibility.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Niels van der Boom

Niels van der Boom is a senior market specialist for arable crops at DCA Market Intelligence. He mainly makes analyses and market updates about the potato market. In columns he shares his sharp view on the arable sector and technology.
Comments
6 comments
medium 23 October 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl// artikel/10876296/duitsland-en-frankrijk-determine-lot-van-glyphosate][/url]
man, what are they doing again! what is the alternative??? I think that the environment will deteriorate again if they ban this, because then we have to work more often and with more expensive resources!
Subscriber
mafex 24 October 2017
all alternatives are more expensive, and also more harmful, consume more fuel, wear more hours, work more hours
hopefully they will come to an understanding
participation without insight, leads to judgment without prospects
Jan 24 October 2017
@me.. what's the alternative? would less production at a higher price seem like a good alternative to you? more manual work does mean a less rapid increase in scale. is that a bad prospect?
shoemakers1 24 October 2017
Jan wrote:
@me.. what's the alternative? would less production at a higher price seem like a good alternative to you? more manual work does mean a less rapid increase in scale. is that a bad prospect?

the world market will ensure that this does not lead to a higher price
Skirt 24 October 2017
Is going back 30 years progress?
West Brabant 24 October 2017
Fortunately, the 1 million signatories of the citizens' initiative against glyphosate are willing to help us with the extra handiwork in the future.
Jan 25 October 2017
@schoenmakers1 The EU stipulates that the borders must be open indefinitely. If you have opted for that, you will be in for a ride for the future.

Who decides that you have to produce for the world market with questionable qualities? Is there a world market for seed potatoes and grass seed? or for organic greetings? No, because the customer first buys on the basis of quality and is prepared to pay for it. Craftsmanship and quality are difficult to reconcile with large-scale.

@Kjol. turning back on a wrong decision is sometimes necessary on the way forward.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Arable

Concerns over glyphosate resistance in England

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register