European Parliament votes against

Glyphosate is 1-0 behind in Brussels

24 October 2017 - Niels van der Boom - 9 comments

The European Parliament (EP) voted on Tuesday 24 October about renewing the license for glyphosate. The herbicide is given an extension of 5 years, while 10 years was demanded. Member States will vote on the decision on 25 October.

The glyphosate file is a hot topic in Brussels. Partly because the debate between advocates and environmental organizations, which are firmly against, is running high. The signal that the EP is sending is clear. Glyphosate is 1-0 behind, which means that innovation for 'green' alternatives must be accelerated. The problem, however, is that they are scarcely available or are being thwarted.

355

January

of the European Parliament voted against

Parliament is for ban
355 MPs voted in favor of a ban after 5 years, 204 were against and 111 abstained. So is CDA MEP Annie Schreijer-Pierik. "For an extension of the authorization, only scientific facts about the carcinogens must be decisive," she says. "European agencies and scientists conclude that there is no conclusive evidence for this. A complete ban, which will lead to the admission until 2022, is disproportionate."

Final vote Wednesday
Individual member states will vote on the extension on Wednesday 25 October. This is valid for 10 years, but you can also opt for 3 or 5 years. At least 16 Member States, representing 65% of the European population, must vote in favor of an extension tomorrow. The United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Spain are positive about the extension. France, a key stakeholder, is against it.

Producers from the Netherlands are thwarted

Alternatives are hampered
Schreijer-Pierik calls glyphosate "indispensable for large parts of European agriculture and horticulture." It does welcome the fact that pre-harvest spraying is no longer allowed, as is the use on pavements by municipalities, among other things. "Where there is a threat of leaching, good prevention measures are required. For example, the use of equivalent green low-risk resources," says the MEP.

"They now have to endure unnecessarily long national and EU admission procedures. Dutch producers are unnecessarily hindered. Green PPPs, of organic origin, must be given space as a matter of urgency from the European Commission and Member States, including through an accelerated authorization procedure. the CDA was already adopted by the EU parliament in February."

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Niels van der Boom

Niels van der Boom is a senior market specialist for arable crops at DCA Market Intelligence. He mainly makes analyses and market updates about the potato market. In columns he shares his sharp view on the arable sector and technology.
Comments
9 comments
call 24 October 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/akkerbouw/artikel/10876313/glyphosaat-staat-1-0-achter-in-brussel][/url]
and ladies and gentlemen of the eu parliament, when are we going to ban the production and consumption of the cigarette? After all, it has been scientifically proven for years that it is carcinogenic. Or do they not want to offend the large group of smoking voters, let alone the powerful (rich) tobacco lobby and their lavish gifts.
realist 24 October 2017
cagri wrote:
This is a response to this article:
and ladies and gentlemen of the eu parliament, when are we going to ban the production and consumption of the cigarette? After all, it has been scientifically proven for years that it is carcinogenic. Or do they not want to offend the large group of smoking voters, let alone the powerful (rich) tobacco lobby and their lavish gifts.

Yes, indeed, cigarettes, such as diesel, BBQ or fries and chips with acrylamide are also carcinogenic, so the EU parliament should also ban these products
Why all glyphosate ? It's a nonsense
Thanks to the ecologists integrists
Subscriber
Skirt 24 October 2017
What a farmer uses must by definition be bad for the environment....
Ach 25 October 2017
Oh well, let them ban it. Who knows what causes it all in countries with larger business areas. They suffer a lot more
gerard 25 October 2017
products from other countries will also be free of glyphosate
Subscriber
Skirt 25 October 2017
No, of course not, really nobody cares about glyphosate. The Canadians will soon deliver in full thanks to Ceta.
Marina 26 October 2017
Where do you currently find food that has NOT been in contact with glyphosate? Our product. see: https://www.da-costa-art.com/voorpagina

Moringa products that come from Sri Lanka and India and are so cheap? Have you ever wondered how people grow?
Certified or not, it doesn't matter. The hand is also lifted with certification. Did you know that you can mix 70% certified product with 30% uncertified? It's time we started supporting small farmers/entrepreneurs with purchases. And see for yourself where the product comes from. I am in favor of the NICHE market.
John 27 October 2017
And I'm in favor of you keeping your beak
Djonie 27 October 2017
john wrote:
And I'm in favor of you keeping your beak



are you a major shareholder of Monsanto (or Bayer)?
the rest 27 October 2017
Please have some courtesy John!
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Arable

Concerns over glyphosate resistance in England

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register