Still take away cows

Judge agrees with State in phosphate issue

31 October 2017 - Bart-Jan van Zandwijk - 16 comments

The 51 dairy farmers who have instituted summary proceedings regarding the phosphate reduction plan 2017 must nevertheless comply with the rules and dispose of cows. This was decided by the Court of Appeal of The Hague on Tuesday 31 October following the State's appeal.

Co-author is Esther de Snoo.

The phosphate reduction plan was born on May 4 for 51 dairy farmers. The State appealed against this. The judge in The Hague now rules that the dairy farmers could foresee that the government would take measures after the abolition of the milk quota on March 31, 2015.

They still have to remove animals

The phosphate reduction plan, which came into effect on 1 March 2017 and forced dairy farmers to remove animals, does apply to this group. They must still remove animals and reduce the number of dairy cows on their farm to the reference level of 2 July 2015.

After the ruling of 4 May, another 400 dairy farmers went to court. They also believed that they were not eligible for the phosphate reduction plan. The State also appealed this. It is still unknown when it will be announced.

Objection
Went on May 4 51 dairy farmers in objection to the phosphate reduction plan. They demanded that the plan be put out of action for them. The dairy farmers indicate that they are disproportionately burdened. They have in fact invested in their company, through land or animal numbers, completely in line with the then applicable land-based growth dairy farming act.

Later they were restricted, even though they had already made financial commitments. The judge ruled in their favor. However, Martijn van Dam went on September 19 in higher appeal. Organic dairy farmers also wanted to be exempted from the phosphate reduction plan. After all, they did not contribute to the phosphate surplus, they reported.

The ruling now applies to the entire group of 51 dairy farmers, including some organic farms.

Why was the phosphate reduction plan established?
The phosphate reduction plan came into effect in March of this year. This is to ensure that the phosphate production of the dairy herd remains below the phosphate ceiling, which is necessary to maintain the derogation in the future.

The State is of the opinion that all dairy farmers must comply with the obligations of the phosphate reduction plan, because otherwise the Netherlands will not fall below the phosphate ceiling and therefore cannot be granted a derogation. In addition, he is of the opinion that the dairy farmers knew that they would exceed the phosphate ceiling after the milk quota was abolished.

How does it work again?
Dairy farmers have to return to the reference number of 2 July 2015 via this reduction plan. From 1 March 2017, they were given the task of reducing a percentage each period. If they do not meet this 2 monthly reduction percentage, they will be charged a levy. If they do, but do not yet meet the reference number, they will be charged a solidarity levy. These charges can be high if the target is not met.

How much effect and warning
So far, in total 5,1 million kilos phosphate reduced. This means that the objective has been achieved temporarily, but the former minister Hank Kamp has already warned of a growing dairy herd in September.

At the National Economic Agriculture Congress, Lubbert van Dellen will also discuss the impact of phosphate rights on dairy farmers' business operations. Subscribers can attend the conference for free. Click here for more information.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
16 comments
frieze 31 October 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/melkvee/ artikel/10876383/rechter- Geef-staat-equal-in-phosphate question][/url]
Fortunately....nice cows to be removed. must someone else too and especially those who did not cause the surplus also had to
Not growing 31 October 2017
100% agree,
But you have to be so honest that the growers have done nothing wrong
An overall standstill on July 2, 2015 would have been better and that's where the government has defaulted
andre vw 31 October 2017
To date, Linssen cs advocaten is the only winner in this regard.
Too bad for the real bottlenecks that it turns out like this.
Andre 31 October 2017
How far have we fallen in the Netherlands?
You will only have started in 2015. Son came home, bought cows, renovated the stable, received sufficient land, received permits and entered into financial obligations..
Then what did you do wrong?
Now slaughter cows and hang yourself financially?
Iron 31 October 2017
It is a pity that a judge does not hold the State liable for their intransigent behavior in 2015 prior to the end date of the quota. Ultimately, we Agro-Entrepreneurs are always the victims of Heren from the Hague and Judges of State who have been appointed by the State. Question arises "How independent are They". And where have our Agro-administrators failed to ensure that the Government was not sufficiently chasing the proverbial....! But it is and remains a Hague get-together of State and Government/ Urban area.
However, can we still crack judges as agro-advocates?
Agro-Entrepreneurs never dream, the government is TOO unreliable for that. See every time changing current regulations and just abolishing things that affects our business. Good luck Agro-Entrepreneurs.
Subscriber
Dirk (milk) 31 October 2017
The non-growers have done even less wrong and they are (partially) also the losers. That's really unreasonable.
The growers really did it themselves, nobody ever said to them: "you have to build a new barn for 250-500 dairy cows with borrowed money or find a second location".
Perhaps the non-growers can now file a claim for damages [read: start a civil procedure] against the growers. Seems reasonable to me
Linssen lawyers are very knowledgeable and if you do find yourself in trouble, you have a good chance with them. They don't start without a chance. Again, it is your choice to initiate legal proceedings. But, as a simple dairy farmer with quite a bit of competition experience, I can tell you that the State of the Netherlands is a difficult opponent to beat. That was the case when the milk quota was introduced and it will be no different now
andre vw 31 October 2017
Excellent BoerenBusiness,

We have winter time again since Sunday.
Subscriber
Dirk (milk) 31 October 2017
The non-growers have done even less wrong and they are (partially) also the losers. That's really unreasonable.
The growers really did it themselves, nobody ever said to them: "you have to build a new barn for 250-500 dairy cows with borrowed money or find a second location".
Perhaps the non-growers can now file a claim for damages [read: start a civil procedure] against the growers. Seems reasonable to me
Linssen lawyers are very knowledgeable and if you do find yourself in trouble, you have a good chance with them. They don't start without a chance. Again, it is your choice to initiate legal proceedings. But, as a simple dairy farmer with quite a bit of competition experience, I can tell you that the State of the Netherlands is a difficult opponent to beat. That was the case when the milk quota was introduced and it will be no different now
Still Hope 31 October 2017
Elsewhere on the internet I read the following: the Court of Appeal is also of the opinion that it cannot be said in a general sense that the Regulation will lead to disproportionate consequences. An assessment of all the circumstances of the individual case is required to answer the question of whether the Scheme leads to disproportionate consequences in individual cases. So there is still hope!!
peter 31 October 2017
the State wants to reduce animal emissions and 55% of dairy farmers want to keep derogation at all costs (despite the fact that RFC wants to cost less milk from other 45% dairy farmers), So what's the problem?
peter 31 October 2017
Farmers have to start milking FULLY and let the derogation fly (see additional rules for fertilization of maize cultivation), so no expensive phosphate rights (air bubble). Only then will The Hague have a problem with their CO2 reduction. Let them pull the purse, like with the mink farmers! and not that we dairy farmers put a cookie in the cookie box of NZO and then hand it out to STOPPERS!!!!!
Jan 31 October 2017
@not growing. you have a good point there. the state failed again. but the banks and LTO are also to blame. yet here too greed and pride were two guiding emotions. when do we learn that?
Bert 31 October 2017
With this ruling from the Supreme Court you have winners and losers. But I can say from experience that for young entrepreneurs who have a vision, who stick their necks out, and who are entrepreneurs through and through, this is another big step in the back. Apparently there is no longer a need here in the Netherlands for good entrepreneurs who can ensure that we produce fair and affordable food here in the Netherlands. We are all chasing these young entrepreneurs away! In 5 years' time, we will still have such passionate dairy farmers in the Netherlands!
sjakie 31 October 2017
gentle surgeons
smelly wounds
had 2 July acted as a leader Van Dam
you have no winners in this phosphate nonsense
mdb 31 October 2017
I've been saying it for some time....last generation of farmers; no successor, who is at his best, falls for this!

Who wants to milk 200 cows with a bunch of shit, and have nothing to do with it! ?Do not have a normal life such guys!
Brill 1 November 2017
agree, the mega companies have caused this misery with the advice of the farmers' organizations of growing bigger bigger
partly because of them, the small farms have no chance at all to survive, because in order to qualify for exemption, investments had to be made
small farmers don't do that so easily
that is why I now think it is good that every farmer should suffer
and that applies to me, then also to farmers with meat cattle in the country, because
those circles shit as good shit as a dairy cow
theon 3 November 2017
the high wage costs and expensive automation, the companies have to keep growing in order to survive! If the selling prices do not go up, the business is over. the clear-cutting in the countryside will continue if nothing changes. Thousands of hectares of good agricultural land have gone to nature. land prices are sky-high. And properly fertilizing the soil as it should be, is no longer allowed! Very unreliable Banks and a Government that only makes unworkable rules with the blunt axe. Good governance is foresight, not shooting people with a cannon!
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register