Guidance note from EC

'New CAP must be simpler and fairer'

30 November 2017 - Bart-Jan van Zandwijk - 9 comments

The new Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), which will come into effect from 2021, should be simpler and more equitable. Individual member states must also be given more say. This is stated in the orientation note, which the European Commission presented on Wednesday 29 November.

The new policy must move from 'one size fits all' to a 'tailor-made approach'. The new policy should be simpler and target individual countries and/or regions. Member States, at national or regional level, will be able to choose their preference for a particular law from a common set of measures.

From 'one size fits all' to 'tailor-made approach'

Each Member State must prepare a strategic plan for the CAP, which includes both Pillar 1 and Pillar 2 measures. This plan will better tailor the CAP to local conditions and needs. This makes it possible to make a maximum contribution to the objectives and targets of the European Union (EU). The EU will then check these plans.

Authority and Responsibilities
At the same time, Member States will have more say in the design of compliance, which applies to individual countries. Member States will be given more responsibilities and more accountability. This also ensures a level playing field.

Annie Schreijer-Pierik, CDA MEP: "It is good that the European Commission wants to assign more responsibilities to the Member States. In this way, local needs and circumstances can be better taken into account."

Fairer Policy
The old policy focused on 2 pillars. That must be preserved. The first pillar focuses on direct payments. The second pillar is multiannual and flexible and better adapted to the local situation of the individual Member States. The CAP aims to ensure that aid reaches farmers. About 20% of farmers now receive 80% support. That has to change and a number of options are being explored for this. 

It is now being examined whether a mandatory capping of direct payments, introduction of degressive payments and a focus on redistributive payments are feasible. Schreijer-Pierik: "It cannot be the case that 80% of direct payments end up with only 20% of the companies." She therefore welcomes the proposal to set a subsidy ceiling of €60.000 to €100.000 per company.

Sufficient attention must be paid to young farmers

Sufficient attention must also be paid to young farmers. The CAP should provide flexibility for Member States to develop tailor-made schemes needed for young farmers.

Risks are getting bigger
Farmers face greater risks and income pressures. The committee will continue to champion farmers, but the higher frequency of risk requires a systematic approach. This requires a platform for risk management be established. It is important to share knowledge and exchange practices for the benefit of all those involved; from farmers to research institutions, but also for insurance companies.

At present, consideration is being given to how the future CAP budget can be used more efficiently. The available budget is not expected until May 2018. Discussions will continue in the coming months. Following the expected proposal of the 'Multi-annual Financial Framework', legislative proposals on the future CAP are expected before the summer of 2018. 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
9 comments
seed potato grower 30 November 2017
This is a response to this article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/home/ artikel/10876749/nieuwe-glb-moet- Simpeler-en-eerlijker][/url]
As a relatively young seed potato grower of less than 35 years old, who recently took over the company from his parents, I notice that my sector will miss the cap too much. I can already see it with JOLA for entrepreneurs younger than 40 years. , apparently a plan that makes my business more efficient and therefore more profitable is not enough.

The seed potato sector is an export branch in which making it more sustainable with the help of fewer crop protection products and even less (artificial) fertilizer is very difficult to achieve because this entails even more cultivation risks. The requirements for the quality of seed potatoes are simply high and can be high because we had and have a varied range of resources at our disposal. Therefore, this is a branch of sport where a lot of (supplying) companies earn their living.
Skirt 30 November 2017
seed potato grower wrote:
This is a response to this article:
As a relatively young seed potato grower of less than 35 years old, who recently took over the company from his parents, I notice that my sector will miss the cap too much. I can already see it with JOLA for entrepreneurs younger than 40 years. , apparently a plan that makes my business more efficient and therefore more profitable is not enough.

The seed potato sector is an export branch in which making it more sustainable with the help of fewer crop protection products and even less (artificial) fertilizer is very difficult to achieve because this entails even more cultivation risks. The requirements for the quality of seed potatoes are simply high and can be high because we had and have a varied range of resources at our disposal. Therefore, this is a branch of sport where a lot of (supplying) companies earn their living.


Welcome aboard!

The CAP is not for farmers who cannot become more sustainable or implement other types of environmental measures. The fact that the seed potato sector is good for the economy is great, but current politics does not say that much unless they are happy to sell this knowledge abroad over the back of the sector.
Politically, you are a super farmer if you start growing the seed fully organically, maybe that's another idea to get some money from the government pots.
hans 30 November 2017
that's a bit of a joke. seed potato farmer is absolutely right there is nothing in the cap that makes sense for the young farmer in arable farming / think of buying land / building shed / etc but no, they have a policy where half already drop out because it is not workable another missed opportunity also from the ajk who would contribute points
Skirt 1 December 2017
I completely agree with you Hans, I'm just saying how things are at the moment unfortunately. The fact that the CAP is a monstrosity is because politicians have a completely different view of the future of agriculture.
peter 1 December 2017
Politics, Brussels, multinationals (RFC) etc. do not need the WEST European farmers at all. These farmers are much too expensive with their cost price, that's why CETA treaty, Ukraine treaty, are concluded with Canada. The meat even comes by boat from Argentina or Brazil.
Multinationals buy where it is CHEAPEST. Onions from France are currently cheaper, including transport, than from home soil, how crazy is that? Everything is going to break because of this. The young new generation are not crazy!!!!! Meat from Brazil or Argentina how much C02 EMISSES does this cause with their TAX FREE fuel oil that the ships emit, does BRUSSELS HAVE HEART for the REAL ENVIRONMENT/SUSTAINABILITY or is it appearances or CHEATING!!!!
seed potato grower 2 December 2017
Dear Kjol, Of course we have already looked at the options for producing seed potatoes in an organic way. three quarters of the seed potatoes are destined for export to countries where they are not interested in an organic cultivation method, and certainly not if the quality delivered is lower than it is now. Quality risks such as virus transmission by means of lice, Phytophthora, Silver scurf, Rhizoctonia, Fusarium and feeding on wireworms are not accepted and can be prevented relatively well with the help of pesticides. If these resources disappear and no other resources are available with a comparable effect, the entire (seed potato) sector will be over.
sand farmer 2 December 2017
Those resources may be necessary because the ground is as dead as a doornail. That is not the same as a soil that cannot yield many kg of product. These infestations are probably the result of the absence of the biological fungi and bacteria that are fond of them. Lice are fond of weakened plants, which is an age-old natural intervention to take weak brothers out of the environment. The chemical input and salt input is much too high to grow substantively healthy fruit. That is more than, for example, an owg. But cell structures and the content of nutrients.
Common 2 December 2017
Zandboer wrote:
Those resources may be necessary because the ground is as dead as a doornail. That is not the same as a soil that cannot yield many kg of product. These infestations are probably the result of the absence of the biological fungi and bacteria that are fond of them. Lice are fond of weakened plants, which is an age-old natural intervention to take weak brothers out of the environment. The chemical input and salt input is much too high to grow substantively healthy fruit. That is more than, for example, an owg. But cell structures and the content of nutrients.


Certainly such a copper sprayer
Also common 2 December 2017
Certainly also such a whining conservative poisoner under the name of protective agent. The only thing that is protected with it is the income of the chemical manufacturer. Dare to look beyond the chatter of your GBM advisor
sand farmer 3 December 2017
Occasionally spray copper with weed control in wheat. But otherwise I am a regular farmer. This does not alter the fact that viewing without valves is also interesting. Hanging and believing in GBM is easy, but somehow it is also a sign of ignorance that we are becoming more and more dependent on it. But to each his own.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News GLB

Nature groups force investigation into CAP

Politics GLB

Advice: redistribute European agricultural subsidies

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register