Shutterstock

Background Congress ABN Amro

'Making a broader construction plan yields profit'

15 November 2018 - Anne Jan Doorn - 23 comments

Making a wider rotation mandatory, if necessary, will help the arable farming sector to make the transition to circular agriculture. It was one of the recommendations put forward at the ABN Amro 'Next Generation Farming' meeting on Wednesday 14 November.

The aim of the meeting was to contribute, together with representatives from the agricultural sector, to the elaboration of the agricultural vision of Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality). Pierre Berntsen, agricultural director at ABN Amro, kicked off the meeting by describing the successes of the past 70 years. He said that the situation for the position of farmers and the environment is now starting to become precarious.

pinching situation
Aldrik Gierveld, the director-general of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, also demonstrated this pressing situation. "The production increase over the past 10 years has been 25%, while the farmer's income has only increased by 10%," says Gierveld.

"The route to escape this negative spiral and to find the way to a sustainable sector is food that is produced. The price for the product must improve, so that the farmer has room for sustainable initiatives," says Berntsen. "It is also important that the value of the sustainable product is also recognized in the export markets."

Then it was the turn of the industry representatives to come up with recommendations. Making the wider rotation mandatory was widely supported by representatives from the plant sector. "Where the construction plan is now often 1 in 3 or 1 in 4, this should be expanded to at least 1 in 5", it was said.

Value of product must be recognized in the export market

-Pierre Berntsen

Peace, space and efficiency
This provides various advantages: less disease pressure and as a result less crop protection products will also be used. In many cases it also provides more manure space, for example by including wheat in the cropping plan. This is beneficial for both the arable farmer and the livestock farmer. Applying more wheat and animal manure is also important for soil diversity, organic matter levels and soil quality. In addition, fewer potatoes and onions will be produced as a result, which is better for price formation (less surpluses). In short: peace, space and efficiency.

This should be achieved through rewards, including from the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), instead of working with punitive measures. Growers who have a wide rotation and collaboration with a livestock farmer should receive more subsidy. It was also advised that the value of the product should be more clearly displayed; this can be done, among other things, by communicating the actual cost of the product.

Entire chain as a starting point
The representatives from the animal sector argue that the entire chain should be approached as a starting point and that all parties in that chain should work together better. All parties must be prepared to give up freedoms in this regard. Long-term agreements should form a basis for this.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Anne-Jan Doorn

Anne Jan Doorn is an arable expert at Boerenbusiness. He writes about the various arable farming markets and also focuses on the land and energy market.
Comments
23 comments
Haarlemmermeer 15 November 2018
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ artikel/10880522/verligen-van-ruimer-bouwplan-levert-profit-op]'Mandating a broader construction plan yields profit'[/url]
Why expand construction plan? More cost increase. fertilizer tax, disappearance of essential gpm, and now expansion of the construction plan. Where is this going?
Southern Flevoland 15 November 2018
Completely agree, this was invented to keep livestock farming hands above head
Subscriber
medium 15 November 2018
yes why expand further? to grow more grain so that you know ahead of time that you don't earn anything?! they are really well lost in the Netherlands and let everything come over them through Europe / Brussels, and Idd all that to maintain livestock farming and arable farming can certainly pay for it!
Skirt 15 November 2018
God for us all, each for himself. NL agriculture has ended up on the Titanic, this is going to end badly.
Subscriber
info 15 November 2018
meddling even more in the farmer's policy, freedom and self-insight pleases most farmers and they have been deprived of that far too much. It's the papers (farmers) who want to rule the business from behind the desk, nothing comes of it

Rob 15 November 2018
Towards a planned economy according to the Russian model. Because if you say more broadly, you should also check that. And then determine a rotation per crop. Because 1 in 5 carrots or onions will probably not be desired.
And if we start growing fewer potatoes here, the price will really not go up. The industry will then immediately be reorganized to prevent healthy competition. Just move a factory to a country that does want to grow. Relocation costs borne by the cartel.
And then in the course of the article the monkey comes out of the sleeve. If we grow more wheat, we can also purchase more manure. Another example of a lobby that arable farming has to solve the problem of livestock farming and is still allowed to pay for it itself.
gash 16 November 2018
If they want more manure sales, the phosphate space in arable farming will have to increase. The current revenues are not taken into account at all.

And abolish derogation in dairy farming, yes.
poker player 18 November 2018
I think it's a good idea. I think everyone is such a winner. the soil the farmer and the market. less work more money. who wouldn't want that.1 out of 10 for onions 1 out of 15 for carrots. The people who shout so loudly here must be over-financed at the bank
January 18 November 2018
so let Avebe go to hell? good job the netherlands every economy starts with agriculture and so we want to get rid of it here
Narcos 18 November 2018
In the current political climate, industries such as Avebe and Sugar Union are out of favor. Their products are widely available elsewhere and certainly not hip. Quinoa and green nuts with a veggie ball it must be.
Expanding the cultivation plan by 1 year will bring a better yield for almost all crops and improve the quality of the products.
Rob 18 November 2018
Towards a planned economy according to the Russian model. Because if you say more broadly, you should also check that. And then determine a rotation per crop. Because 1 in 5 carrots or onions will probably not be desired.
And if we start growing fewer potatoes here, the price will really not go up. The industry will then immediately be reorganized to prevent healthy competition. Just move a factory to a country that does want to grow. Relocation costs borne by the cartel.
And then in the course of the article the monkey comes out of the sleeve. If we grow more wheat, we can also purchase more manure. Another example of a lobby that arable farming has to solve the problem of livestock farming and is still allowed to pay for it itself.
Subscriber
crow 18 November 2018
A broader construction plan would be nice, but worldwide and not just in our small country.
loom 18 November 2018
@kraai, name a few countries where cultivation is as intensive as in the Netherlands?
??? !!! 18 November 2018
wider crop plan = overfeeding of ALL markets that are not 'normal arable product', with no certainty of a tighter market of the wheat/potato/onion/beet markets.

in short: perfectly in line with the current remediation policy.

nope 18 November 2018
implement immediately. when I see how farmers here suck the place empty. not normal. chicory carrot bulbs seed potatoes onions and everything in turn. and about the starch areas I will not say anything about their 1 to 2 building plan. and control is no longer difficult at all these days.
old official 18 November 2018
Maximum grain in the crop plan, Ohja the three crops requirement forced to sow spring wheat or barley. However, this gives a hazing, land is black all winter.

Maybe even sow a patch of free onions
Subscriber
crow 18 November 2018
In Canada, Belgium and Germany, there is plenty of 1 in 3 potatoes.
Skirt 19 November 2018
Should also apply to ranchers, 1 in 3 grass. Grass on grass only gives acidification and eutrophication of the soil, in addition, mowing a lot is bad for the meadow birds.
Subscriber
grows 19 November 2018
well kjol, I think it should be the other way around, the livestock farmers who have to tear less grassland. At least 3 years of grassland before it can be plowed.
Subscriber
cheese head 21 November 2018
I say go for it
shoemakers1 21 November 2018
pokerer wrote:
I think it's a good idea. I think everyone is such a winner. the soil the farmer and the market. less work more money. who wouldn't want that.1 out of 10 for onions 1 out of 15 for carrots. The people who shout so loudly here must be over-financed at the bank
if the one with higher fixed costs does stand out, why shouldn't it be for someone with lower fixed costs?

I only want one thing, and that is less rules, all that meddling of the ties is good for nothing!
Martin Stevens 27 November 2018
With the existence of 2 worlds, there is a 3rd. The world in between. What exactly do I mean by this? Between primary production of feed and food is the production of the non-Feed/non-Food market. Also called the emerging world for dual purpose crops. This increases resilience, flexibility and margin. Combined with the underground goal more organic matter in the soil! Can fit as 3 in 1? Yes, by embracing new crops and new markets. Darwin asks for survival of the f..., anticipation and regrouping. Hooray for the cultivation of combination crops for food + biobased economy. No side stream. Consciously grown and chosen for a future on roses!
Subscriber
Skirt 27 November 2018
I see several parties with completely different ideas about agriculture pulling on farmland, but none of the parties wants to spend 1 cent extra for it, a very strange situation. The farmer should be careful that he does not lose his control so slowly, and that he will soon have to dance to the tune of everyone else without a normal compensation.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register