The Remkes committee, which must propose a solution to the nitrogen problem in the Netherlands, is aiming for less livestock. This is apparent from the advice that will be published on Wednesday 25 September, but from which various media are already quoting Saturday 21 September.
The report shows that reducing livestock numbers directly leads to lower nitrogen emissions. The committee, headed by former minister Johan Remkes, also aims to lower the speed limit on highways.
Residential building is given priority
According to the AD all sectors are affected, but agriculture and traffic stand out. This is because the fastest reduction can be booked here. The intention is to allow the projects in housing and road construction to continue as much as possible.
Earlier this week, Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality) informed Radio 1 that he wanted to await the committee's report, but did say that all relevant sectors will probably be affected. "There is no taboo on any measure," she said. These are also the words that Prime Minister Mark Rutte used during the General Reflections.
© DCA Market Intelligence. This market information is subject to copyright. It is not permitted to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or make the content available to third parties for compensation, in any form, without the express written permission of DCA Market Intelligence.
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ artikel/10884085/commissie-remkes-steers-aan-op-minder-vee]Commission Remkes aims for less livestock[/url]
If all the subsidy that now goes to the farmers would go to organic farming to get their products in the shops cheaper than the traditional products, the farmers would switch automatically. Except of course the real stupid farmers.
what a mentality many farmers have. First apply economies of scale, increase production and therefore more pollution and collect subsidies for that, and now they want to remediate and generate subsidies for that too. That is what the revenue model is based on. You have to farm where there is room. That is not in the Netherlands, much too small and densely populated country. Come join us in Poland. We have a lot of land, never received subsidies (do you have backbone or not), and use relatively little fertilizer and fodder; why does everything have to grow so fast? I miss balls at Kjol cs, take your responsibility guys. In German they speak of fearful hares.
You are free to apply for subsidies. We have not done that: on principle. Subsidies are not good for mentality, entrepreneurship and independence. We farmers, must be able to hold our own pants. Providing subsidies to farmers is just as disastrous as development work; bureaucracy, glue stick and 'greenhouse plant' mentality. Farmer unworthy, then stop or go abroad.
@akkerbouw 2.0 you are suggesting a lot; unworthy of a farmer. Farmers who are on the subsidy tit are subsidy addicted and cannot stand on their own two feet. Sad, but they have no future. Unfortunately. A different attitude is really needed: 3.0