Shutterstock

News Nitrogen file

This is how the cabinet wants to reduce nitrogen

13 November 2019 - Wouter Baan - 20 comments

The foot has to be taken off the accelerator and it is up to livestock farmers to feed less protein-rich cattle feed. Extra money will also go to warm remediation in pig farming. With this package of measures, the cabinet hopes to reduce nitrogen emissions so that housing and road construction can get going again. 

The solutions presented by the cabinet on Wednesday 13 November contain no major surprises. Prime Minister Mark Rutte spoke about an annoying package during the press conference in The Hague. In particular, the reduction of the maximum speed to 100 kilometers per hour is an eyesore for him. "However, we must take action. We have a great need for new homes in the Netherlands and nobody wants jobs in the construction sector to be lost."

Less protein-rich animal feed
The solutions relating to the agricultural sector were explained at that press conference by Minister Carola Schouten (Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality). "The cabinet wants to reduce nitrogen emissions with less protein-rich animal feed. This measure will be implemented as soon as the legislation has been passed," the minister said. Also goes there €60 million extra to the warm remediation of pig farming, bringing the budget to €180 million.

The farmers who want to continue can do so

- Carol Schouten

Schouten also emphasized that farmers who want to continue can now do so. She did add that the way of farming may look different in the future. According to Minister Schouten, the quitters will be helped to terminate their company. 

From December, the cabinet will also continue to work on structural solutions. Schouten promised that the status of a number of small Natura 2000 areas will be looked into and will discuss this with the European Commission. In other words, some recognized nature reserves may be deleted or merged. 

Farmer's lunch with FDF, Agractie and LTO
Immediately after the press conference, Rutte and Schouten will have lunch with a delegation of farmers in the Catshuis (in The Hague). At the last minute, Farmers Defense Force, Agractie and LTO Nederland were also invited for this, Rutte announced via Twitter. They had initially passed by and then Agaractie announced a new protest to which several dozen farmers are said to have complied. 

Click here to read the letter. 

 

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Wouter Job

Wouter Baan is editor-in-chief of Boerenbusiness. He also focuses on dairy, pig and meat markets. He also follows (business) developments within agribusiness and interviews CEOs and policymakers.
Comments
20 comments
Drent 13 November 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ artikel/10884658/zo-wil-het-kabinet-stikstof-reduceren]This is how the cabinet wants to reduce nitrogen[/url]
this government is so unreliable!!
Ton Westgeest 13 November 2019
Unreliable and undemocratic...... They are in the grip of the left clique, because they do not want to govern with PVV and FvdD. While at the same time you put away a lot of voters!!

"Schouten promised that the status of some small Natura 2000 areas will be looked at and will discuss this with the European Commission."

Gradually it becomes clear that if we don't delete areas we won't get out of it otherwise..... They are so caught up in the clutches of the left clique that at the moment three new "nature" areas are still being worked on!!!!!

VVD how can you squander your supporters like that, you seem even more left than left!!!
Doubting Pig Farmer 13 November 2019
60 million extra is also just a tip that you only reach a small part with.
600 million for termination of multiple companies had more progress and really means for the reduction of nh3
Perhaps there will be a system in which ammonia rights can be traded more easily to both agriculture and industry than is currently arranged.
But first indicate whether the latent space remains on it or not.
Because otherwise the net kg prices of nitrogen must come to € 200/300
has 13 November 2019
1000 euros per license tax free you should ask, I call that warm.
Subscriber
Fortissimo 13 November 2019
That's right, Ton, they're in trouble at the green church. Why is a mystery to me anyway. It is time for another election. It is bubbling beneath the surface of our country. Healthcare, education, agriculture, construction .... all with various problems, but each time they can be traced back to a government that is not reliable and has a weak back. Driving 100 km per hour is also a drama (except in the Holy Randstad) and we will soon get bored. We suffer en masse from the environmental and virtue ethics of a small group of pushers, who often have not yet learned for it. In other words, not scientifically substantiated at all. What we need are Statesmen, guys and no wimps, who make clear choices. We live in a city-state. Inherent to this is, among other things, the production of CO2 and N. If you can then demonstrate that you are producing efficiently here, then you are betraying yourself if you try to justify the case with accounting tricks such as 100 driving. Respond to such a Vollebroek and do so in the way that Nico Gerrits has argued. It's really messy work what these bunglers of Rutte III dare to reveal.
Drikus 13 November 2019
We can not say that there are no environmental problems . But this nitrogen story seems to me to be very exaggerated when it only concerns those so-called nature areas. And look at nature areas and possibly small merge. I want to say in my eyes that these only get bigger. So something is not right with the description or more companies will get screwed . Who knows may say . Our green fellow citizens will do their best to shoot all possible sensible solutions through the courts. The course and thought to downsize livestock farming has been initiated by these folks and is now being sold under the guise that agriculture and livestock farming must change.
Subscriber
sandhare 13 November 2019
Well, less protein in the cow, less nitrogen in the manure. As an arable farmer, can I spread more fertilizer again.....
Peter Jansen 13 November 2019
Saving nitrogen through concentrates is very old news! Who can give the compound feed industry a big turn around? This has been stopped by this branch of livestock farming for years. Nitrogen (soy) in the feed is THE big N supply, but also part of the revenue model to pay all those expensive ladies and gentlemen who work in this sector!!
peter 13 November 2019
There is no nitrogen problem, the government wants in this way that house prices MUST become more expensive! When houses become more expensive, the banks become stronger and the economy more robust!

The speed down to 100 means that more PENAL money ends up in the cash register of the "legal mafia" in the hague!

All this MUST stop accepting citizens, SMEs, construction and farmers and demand NEW elections!!!

bblogic 13 November 2019
If the government really wants to restore nature, it would be better to fertilize the Natura 2000 areas with nitrogen. That is the quickest way to restore these areas that have been overexploited to what they once were a long time ago: beech and oak forests.
However, they do not want this because these impoverished areas now contain plants that only feel at home there. So, biodiversity. The government therefore does not want the restoration of nature, but the maintenance of a false nature that has arisen from overexploitation. These guys are completely lost.
Mozes 17 November 2019
I hope this isn't a real question, but still:

What is the basis of the nitrogen standard, what enormous danger can we prevent?

Every working Dutch person solves his problems every day to earn money for The Hague, they have no lobbyists from banks with countries without equity that want to use farmland as Building land.

Difficult?
Ton Westgeest 17 November 2019
This is how the cabinet wants to reduce nitrogen.....

The Amer power station, which is actually located in the Natura 2000 area, will soon receive a permit..... for expansion of the emissions!!!!

On May 7, just before the PAS ruling, the Province of Brabant has licensed 82.664 kg of ammonia and 1,6 million kg of NOx to the Amercentrale.

That is an increase as large as the total emissions of 400 dairy farms.

Look that's how the government does it!!!
rule maker 17 November 2019
rules are only there to favor one and destroy the other nothing has changed in ages what a corrupt gang
Piet 17 November 2019
CO₂ compensation sir?

this country is sick
??? !!! 17 November 2019
no longer go to the hague, but only provide food to hospitals.
the population on rations, so that NL can already see how that can go when the last farmer has been bullied.
Mark Rutte is going to be right, this is his biggest (last) crisis.
Do we agree that we will NEVER vote CDA/VVD again?!
Ton Westgeest 17 November 2019
No Piet no Co2 compensation.....

The government has come up with something else 5,7 billion subsidy for the Amercentrale to cut trees in Eastern Europe, South and North America for biomass.

They are there mechanically cut, mechanically ground, pressed into a kind of concentrated feed pellet, loaded into ships, sailed over with polluted fuel oil, burned here where thousands of tons of CO2 are released. Now what nitrogen, what now CO2!!!!!!!!!!

How is it possible that we burn trees and thus blow them into the atmosphere, where CO2 has been stored for hundreds of years, which can no longer absorb CO2 and all with a subsidy????

And why????? Because, just like the aircraft above 915 meters altitude, it does not count for nitrogen emissions, the biomass does not count for the climate objectives............
Ton Westgeest 19 November 2019
https://petities.nl/petitions/verzoek-tot-het-ontslaan-van-het-huidige-kabinet?locale=nl

Due to incompetence....
until here and no further 19 November 2019
Rutte joined today because there is discrimination in football, he should also take action against the years of discrimination against the working
dane 5 December 2019
It is better to ask yourself why the farmers have listened for years to the management of their own LTO and other farmers' organizations and people like Bleker, to whom they owe it that they are now in the boat they are confronted with.

I find it extremely strange that farmers themselves consciously do not seem to want to see that a country that still looks only mono green and gray and at times orange with poison, contains less and less biodiversity and that you can protest what you want you to not be able to change the facts of the high nitrogen deposition if you do not take active measures.

Instead of being angry with provincial governments, it would have been much more logical to be angry with governments from their own ranks, who knowingly and willingly continue to provide false information.
shoemakers 1 5 December 2019
you may wonder why lto has always only brought a message from the government to members, because of lto's weak action we are now in the situation that farmers have to solve the problems that the whole of the Netherlands comes up with, the nature reserves are so dead like a pier, the farmland in the only place where something wants to live in the Netherlands, compare it whether you can eat a cake, the farmland, or bite on a straw, the nature reserves, it has gone too far, it is getting high time when common sense triumphed, the destruction of the Netherlands has gone far too far
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register