Shutterstock

News Nitrogen problems

'Concentrating agriculture on the best soils'

5 December 2019 - Anne Jan Doorn - 7 comments

Dutch agriculture must be concentrated on the best agricultural land in the Netherlands. This is what former agriculture minister Cees Veerman and chair of Wageningen University (WUR) Louise Fresco advocate. With the idea of ​​an agricultural main structure, they are in favor of policies that are the opposite of current government policies.

The idea, advocated in the Financieele Dagblad, is that the Dutch government should concentrate agriculture in contiguous areas. In those areas, farmers are given priority over nature conservation and housing. The concatenated area refers to the most fertile clay and loam soils in a strip of Zeeuws-Vlaanderen and West-Brabant and the rich grasslands in the west via the Flevopolders to Friesland and Groningen.

Same production with less land
The leaders are based on statements by Wageningen professor Rudy Rabbinge. According to him, his plan is the best solution for, among other things, the nitrogen problem. “Good agriculture in the right place can produce as much with half the current acreage as it does now. And that only requires 20% of the current input of pesticides and fertilizers," says Rabbinge the FD.

In addition, the idea of ​​an agricultural main structure would bring other advantages, according to him. He argues, for example, that it will make agriculture more vital, that significant environmental benefits will be achieved and that there will be more space for purposes such as nature and housing.

Prevent further unrest
The professor is currently on the Nitrogen Problems advisory committee, which is working on the nitrogen issue under the leadership of Johan Remkers. Fresco and Veerman believe that Rabbinge's plan for an agricultural main structure is the only way to prevent further unrest in the agricultural sector. It has already been suggested before that the RVOB can play a role by relocating companies from the Natura 2000 areas to Flevoland.

The professor's plan is very similar to, for example the vision of science journalist Hidde Boersma† The ecomodernism he proposes argues that the agricultural sector should not become more nature-inclusive, but rather more intensive. This leaves more room for nature. Also, the plan that Fresco and Veerman are now coming up with is completely opposite to the policy of the current government. Agriculture and nature are intertwined as much as possible in this.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Anne-Jan Doorn

Anne Jan Doorn is an arable expert at Boerenbusiness. He writes about the various arable farming markets and also focuses on the land and energy market.
Comments
7 comments
Veluwe sustainable farmer 5 December 2019
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10884931/landbouw-concentraren-op-de-beste-gronden]'Concentrating agriculture on the best soils'[/url]
first return Lelystad Airport to AGRICULTURE.
and buying land by a farmer for a Veluwe price.
poor sand farmer 5 December 2019
****** and ***** CV together with left-wing LF may decide a la lodewijk de X1V about my fate, didn't think so
ordinary 5 December 2019
introducing the German threshold will ensure peace of mind for farmers and construction workers
Rob Smith 5 December 2019
De Veerman with 400 ha in France also wants to say something. He will tell it again together with the left-wing stronghold from Wageningen. And keep telling us how bad nature is. Then point out that bad nature. And then don't start again about those few square meters of heather they messed up themselves
frans 5 December 2019
nonsense then you forget the best region of the Netherlands where the good horticulture / arable farmers are located Limburg / Brabant. the Netherlands is destroyed by this lazy and ignorance... let the farmers burp
sefO 6 December 2019
First let an independent commission look at the state of the Dutch nature.
Now another couple of *** who have something to say, downright “disgusting”
Chairman of a left-wing institute and former chairman of Natuurmonumenten come to explain that the farmers from Brabant have been seen.
This duo must first consider how Dutch nature stands, on the understanding that there is billions of dollars in overdue maintenance that has nothing to do with nitrogen.
The TBOs have only taken land from the farmers, these people have never heard of maintenance and there is also no money for it.
Veerman and Fresco stop with your despicable ideas leave hardworking people alone and make sure what is going on to your left.
Nitrogen is not the REAL problem!!
dane 6 December 2019
a bad plan, because this only wants to maintain the increase in scale and excessive intensification and we just have to get rid of that.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up