Agriphoto

News Crop protection

Unworkable rules around substance possession threaten

15 January 2020 - Jeannet Pennings - 22 comments

Growers may soon be prohibited from stocking crop protection products that are not intended for and permitted for their own cultivation. This proposal threatens to create unworkable rules, warn the LTO and the SGP, among others.

The House of Representatives will debate the new Plant Health Act this afternoon, Wednesday 15 January. The measures relating to plant protection products are part of this. The proposed ban concerns the possession of substances that are not intended for and allowed in the crops being grown at that time.

Doesn't help the environment either
According to LTO Nederland, this proposal completely ignores the daily practice of the grower. The crops grown can rotate annually due to rotation and changed cultivation plans. The proposed ban would only lead to additional costs and red tape. Not even the environment would benefit. After all, if the grower changes his cultivation plan, he would have to get rid of half-empty packaging of crop protection products, says Joris Baecke.

According to the LTO director with the Healthy Plants portfolio, the grower is unnecessarily incurring costs. "Disposal costs have to be incurred first and then have to purchase the relevant crop protection product again for a next crop where the product is allowed again."

Sprays for others
In addition, implementation problems arise for suppliers. The article prohibits the sale and supply of crop protection products to growers that are not applicable to the crops they are currently growing. The question is whether suppliers should then check growers' building plans. In addition, many growers and contractors also carry out spraying for other companies. It is unclear who is responsible.

SGP MP Roelof Bisschop also speaks out strongly in the matter. "Once again, farmers are in danger of being saddled with rules that are nice on paper, but are difficult or even unworkable in practice." Bisschop: "What if you have some left over and want to start using it again in two years' time, because that's how it works in practice. And do they really not know at the ministry that some farmers also spray at their neighbors or other colleagues? not work!"

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Jeanette Pennings

Jeannet has her roots in the flower bulb sector and she grew up on an agricultural company in the northern part of North Holland. As a generalist she reports for Boerenbusiness across all sectors. She is also exploring the possibilities of sponsored advertising.
Comments
22 comments
rinus 15 January 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ artikel/10885295/onwerkbare-regelen-rondom- resource ownership-threatening]Unworkable rules around substance possession threaten[/url]
mss a task for bb to give full throttle here and put something away in the hague that the measure is now full regarding regulations!!
If they want to keep farmers, this nonsense is completely unnecessary and again unworkable...
Skirt 15 January 2020
I'm curious how this ends.
plant protection products manufacturer 15 January 2020
I still sell underground shelters.
Subscriber
Roy 15 January 2020
And they just keep making up stupid rules. The farmers are fed up, see the pig farmers. When will people wake up to one of the best sectors being ruined?
Pete 15 January 2020
Aren't there lobbyists from Bayer with social history exterminator? (Roundup for parasites)

https://www.transparency.nl/nieuws/2018/07/onderzoek-lobbywatch-bedrijfsleven-loopt-deur-plat-rutte-iii/

Lelystad Airport, every farm toddler understands that...
The Netherlands is a lost cause, there is no chemotherapy for VVD, on to cancer-causing 5G radiation (short wave so a lot, a lot of radiation and masts: Rutte's Endlösung.

This country is insane.
Student 15 January 2020
This country is insane and Piet is the proof
shoemakers 1 15 January 2020
Piet is the proof because he puts it well?
Skirt 15 January 2020
Make Flevopolder nitrogen-free, then Lelystad can open and build the Randstad.
shoemakers 1 16 January 2020
Isn't it strange, we farmers must have substantiated all environmental requirements before we get a permit to build something, Lelystad airport simply gets a construction permit without the environmental requirements being addressed?????? I find this very strange, I could call it discrimination
Pete 16 January 2020
dr. prof. social history students are the problem.
Skirt 16 January 2020
Hopefully a lot of subsidy on forest planting with Fransje Timmermans are 1000 billion. Can we get rid of the nagging and continue farming on the other side of the ocean?
DUH 16 January 2020
Investing in wind energy and solar parks will score you points with Frans. An additional advantage is that you become rich while sleeping...
Ik 20 January 2020
I really wonder why there is so much stupid talk on this forum. Aren't you just smarter or is it just tough doing. Every time a logical measure to improve environmental disasters, nature, food safety and the like comes along, everyone raves in the most horrible terms. Rutte, Timmermans, everyone gets the full blast.
Take a look at Schiphol: Remkes comes up with requirements and rules, Schiphol immediately says that this is a good idea, problem solved. Excellent for image.
Skirt 20 January 2020
Schiphol laughs softly, a few electric buses, some extra LED lamps and a pilot project with electric aircraft tow. In addition, buy some ammonia rights in the area and that's it.
Equals a farmer to mow the garden with an electric lawn mower instead of with a petrol mower (so nothing).
south farmer 20 January 2020
I do hope that you are smart enough to consider that a different revenue model applies at Schiphol than at the individual farmer. At Schiphol they will not turn their backs on a few LED lights and electric taxis more or less if they can expand again with thousands of flights.
The farmer is not put in advance of a revenue model in circular agriculture, but he is allowed to turn the company completely upside down with all the associated risks. Who dares to invest in hot air these days? At least not this boy!
Henri 22 January 2020
Me, imago, the draft is done! Reminiscent of historical sociology...

Finally common sense and then the dung heap over it, Sin.

what else can you say when working for her subsidy dictatorship
Henri 22 January 2020
Nonsense what we say?

FARMERS HAVE IT FORECASTS GODDAMN HERE:

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2020/01/22/advies-bouw-ook-huizen-in-groene-hart-en-op-platteland-a3987786
Pete 22 January 2020
That's right, after the nitrogen crisis, now tractor license plate just before new pay slip to appease citizens. After the action, the whole of the Netherlands 100 (in a traffic jam) blamed on the Boers.

Farmers are smeared with pitch and feathers and then agricultural land is expropriated for building land of 390 euros per square meter, start calculating!

Get legal aid to contractually stipulate that real estate lobbyist ruts will not run off with your building land!

Everything is given away, warriors are turning in their graves.
Harm 23 January 2020
Thanks to VVD Nazis:

Shave voters & try them according to the Islam of the Rutte.
Pete 23 January 2020
it's not about what rutte did, but what he let rot, nitrogen standard was the first corpse

There will be no more voting for his comfortable disease, left-wing parties will come with an unconsidered culture slaughter.

People's Party for Freedom and Democracy: Every word is a lie.

First and foremost if it is not about accountability from plane crash to AI without referendums: convinced of your own arrogant opinion:
rotten may burn forever as we shall burn!
Jannie 23 January 2020
It will never be the way it was. The golden age is definitely behind us. New entrepreneurship is expected of us. Otherwise we will end up at the GZZ.
Eduard 23 January 2020
After impossible nitrogen standards, new entrepreneurship.

Think tanks are busy with agricultural robbery, converting agricultural land to be expropriated into building land is a story of billions and you believe in new entrepreneurship...?

https://www.transparency.nl/nieuws/2018/07/onderzoek-lobbywatch-bedrijfsleven-loopt-deur-plat-rutte-iii/

This is the story of subsidy dictatorship of real estate lobbyists.
The hell of rotten? right makes the cross, left kicks us in,

the best thing: they do this from OUR cents day in day out the case verutten from Groningen, Lelystad to G5 radiation which is even banned in Germany, 1945 repeats itself, only the corpses are different.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Opinions Jaap Haanstra

Are we banning glyphosate or Parkinson's?

News Crop protection

More medium in consumption potatoes than starch potatoes

News Crop protection

Chinese asset sales enter next phase after major growth

News Arable

Mandatory use of closed filling system by 2027

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up