Jan van Dasler / Shutterstock.com

Analysis Nitrogen file

Agriculture Collective has to glue up fragments

2 February 2020 - Eric de Lijster - 11 comments

Now that the negotiations in the nitrogen dossier are slowly reaching their peak, things are rumbling within the Agricultural Collective. Disagreements about the course to be followed between LTO Nederland and Farmers Defense Force are shared publicly. Debris that needs to be glued up quickly.

Prime Minister Mark Rutte and Agriculture Minister Carola Schouten have undoubtedly been surprised in recent days at the messages that came out about the discussions within the Agricultural Collective. Next Wednesday, February 5, the ministers will meet again with a delegation from the monster association of 13 farmers' organisations. But if we are to believe all the stories, Rutte and Schouten could almost have found another way to spend that part of the day.

increase voltage
Tension had been heightened considerably just before this meeting, especially by Farmers Defense Force (FDF). The aim of the Agricultural Collective was to reach definitive agreements with the cabinet on Wednesday about the contribution of agriculture to nitrogen reduction. This is in line with the discussions that the collective had on December 16, 2019 in the Catshuis with Rutte and Schouten. To put pressure on the kettle, FDF had announced a large-scale tractor campaign in The Hague before 5 February and has now mobilized its followers for this.

But then the Mesdag Dairy Fund announced that it would come up with its own calculations of the nitrogen data from RIVM on 20 February. The organization received these data from the RIVM at the beginning of the year after lengthy legal discussions. And although the organization itself has indicated that it will not make any announcements about the progress of the analyzes in the meantime, it has already trickled through to the Agricultural Collective that the Mesdag Dairy Fund comes with completely different conclusions than the RIVM. 

Waiting with appointments
Reason for the Agricultural Collective to wait until after 20 February to make concrete nitrogen agreements with the cabinet. But what to do with the meeting of 5 February with Rutte and Schouten? And the big tractor action of FDF? "Both are cancelled," FDF reported on Thursday evening, January 30, in a press release that was quickly withdrawn again. This message was accidentally sent when the Agricultural Collective was meeting on 5 February. The effect of this incident on the atmosphere in the remainder of the meeting can be imagined. 

A day later, on Friday morning, FDF reports in a short statement that only the tractor action will not take place. Mark van den Oever, chairman of FDF, says late on Friday evening in a personal press release that he is disappointed in LTO. According to him, LTO has blocked the agreement within the collective that FDF will cancel the trigger action in exchange for canceling the consultation on 5 February. LTO Nederland, in turn, reported on Saturday in a statement on its website that the Agricultural Collective's line is and was to continue to talk with Rutte and Schouten. "It would have been better to personally share dissatisfaction with each other, not via the app group and the media," the organization reports.

Sources within the Agricultural Collective say in a response that LTO Nederland cannot be blamed for the commotion that has arisen. All parties support the current course and LTO's stance is described as 'particularly constructive'. The continuous unrest caused by the combination of FDF and the Dutch Dairymen Board is considered energy-consuming. This is striking on the one hand, because FDF has taken the initiative to form the Agricultural Collective. On the other hand, Van den Oever has set the bar high in the communication to his supporters in reaching a good nitrogen agreement.

Preventing loss of face
There is no doubt that FDF, LTO and the other parties have to get on with each other within the Agricultural Collective. The interests in the nitrogen dossier are too great for that. It is up to Aalt Dijkhuizen, chairman of the Agricultural Collective, to close the ranks. And, in particular, prevent loss of face towards the cabinet. The Agricultural Collective now wants to put the bottlenecks in the licensing of individual agricultural companies at the top of the agenda for 5 February. For example, some of them are now being thwarted with lawsuits by the Mobilization for the Environment (MOB).

According to the social media groups, the collective wants to avoid being accused of not wanting to talk or negotiate with the cabinet. Today (Monday) the collective will definitively determine the agenda for Wednesday. Whether Schouten and Rutte in particular find this important enough to reserve time for it - now that no decisions are being made - and whether they also want to wait a little less than 3 weeks, remains to be seen.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Eric the Thrush

Eric is a member of the editorial staff of Boerenbusiness. As a descendant of an arable family, farmer's blood flows through Eric's veins. He considers himself a generalist, but with a preference for economics, trends, markets and marketing.
Comments
11 comments
Student 3 February 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10885741/landbouw-collectief-moet-brokstuken-lijmen]Agriculture Collective must glue fragments[/url]
Agricultural collective will not let you play apart. Let ALL participants keep the peace. It cannot be the case that nothing will be achieved soon and that we then start blaming each other. It is nice if you can explain to your supporters that you have not admitted anything, but it is even better if you can say that you have achieved something together.
peta 3 February 2020
@student : I think the best thing is that as a collective you can say that you have not conceded anything to the solution of a paper official and political problem.
Just wait for Mrs. Rotgers' report before giving even one finger to a fictitious solution to a fictitious problem.
Enough has been screwed up by poor advocacy from multi-pet executives and conflicts of interest with political parties. As FDF rightly pointed out, enough is enough, this far and no further!
w palma 3 February 2020
which sources within the lc confirm that lto cannot be blamed? it now looks like @boerenbusiness is also choosing sides... can the editorial staff be more transparent?
Student 3 February 2020
Well Peta you can say that. If the result is that the Collective falls apart and the government then just continues with its policy, then you have achieved nothing. Most farmers think they are indispensable, but if we export up to 90 percent of our production, it is not so bad. The food supply in the Netherlands would not be endangered if 9 out of 10 farmers were to stop. The processing industry can really save itself. The part of the domestic production that is lost, they simply get from abroad. The domestic manufacturers of agricultural technology already supply a lot abroad at the moment. Suppliers of chemical and pharmaceutical agents and fertilizers are often already large chemical concerns, so they can survive. The suppliers of animal feed have a serious problem if they do not also sell their product in neighboring countries. They were therefore clearly present during the protests.
??? !!! 3 February 2020
No student, which is why you are still a student:

A shrinking sector does not innovate. Not just the farmer: ALL supplies, ALL customers, suffer as a result.

In short, with the absurd plans and the associated uncertainty, a fuse has been lit by the government among the entire agribusiness (including advice/research/scientific activity).

It's up to everyone with common sense (common) sense to get that fuse out before the bomb goes off.
Gaj van den Broek 3 February 2020
Wants to advocate for everyone to come up with their name.
Or do you not dare?
shoemakers 1 3 February 2020
Student will find out, when he starts making a living with his hands, that you don't start learning until you get out of school, and yes, if you go for a government job, you have to go to school as long as possible, Can you not think at all and do you believe everything they tell you
ps 3 February 2020
FDF has guts, courage and perseverance and together with knowledge in house, it is not always the case that when a sheep is over the dam, more will follow, that kite does not go up anymore!!!!!!!!!!! we are already kept on a leash and used for years, Agriculture is not the problem but the industry and companies have never had an NB permit or do you want it stolen from the farmers' companies for nothing?? NB license which they now intend to offer for sale
Johan Smith 3 February 2020
Hey Gah, I agree 100%. , that annoys me too. I'd say don't post.

Johan Smith
Jan the farmer 3 February 2020
Why don't you just proclaim the truth?
Fdf has great difficulty with political interference from PvdA doll Marc calon. Who, of course, is only there to protect Pope Timmermans' green deal for his own climate.
Just run the broom through the LTO.
All politicians out with their dual agendas and party interests.
Fdf 5 Feb. The Hague just come...
old hand 3 February 2020
The student has a good story. If the farmer has to return because of the reduction of the overproduction in ammonia, particulate matter, then their suppliers are the losers. That is why they tickle farmers with the slogan: "we are proud of farmers". Farmers are stripped by suppliers; in Eastern Europe the purchase prices for animal feed, fertilizer and machines are much lower. People look over the border.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register