Own picture

News Nitrogen crisis

External netting will not start without sector consultation

2 April 2020 - Erik Colenbrander - 4 comments

Before the external netting scheme comes into effect, the 12 provinces in the Netherlands will consult with the sectors concerned, including livestock farming. That explains the IPO, the umbrella interprovincial body, in a statement today (Thurs 2 April). 

This statement follows immediately after the province of Noord-Brabant explained yesterday why nitrogen rights were purchased outside its own province. This was done to enable the development of Logistiek Park Moerdijk.

Insufficient consultation
The relevant provinces (Drenthe, Zeeland and North Holland) say they were surprised by this action by North Brabant. Today, the 12 deputies of all provinces discussed the situation that had arisen and found that this practice was rejected.

Noord-Brabant wanted to act quickly in the interest of the progress of the project. The province has not consulted sufficiently with its fellow provinces in this regard. That should not have happened and Brabant has apologized to the other provinces for that.

Common interest central
The provincial administrators have emphasized together that when tackling the nitrogen problem, it is of great importance that careful processes are conducted in all areas. In which nitrogen reduction, as much perspective as possible for all sectors, but also nature gains must be central. The 12 provinces now declare that they will act jointly. To prevent parties here and there in the Netherlands from buying up nitrogen space for initiatives that do not serve the common interest of the 12 provinces.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
4 comments
Student 3 April 2020
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url=http://www.boerenbusiness.nl/ artikel/10886519/externe-saldering-start-niet-without-sectoroverleg]External netting will not start without sector consultation[/url]
It's all nice to have those excuses, but it's fundamentally wrong. Agriculture has been showing decreasing emissions for many years and is therefore cutting nicely. We are committed to the environment and that profit must remain in the sector. The industry must hold up its own pants, ie the reduction for new projects must be achieved by buying away dirty industry and not agricultural holdings.
willie van gemert 3 April 2020
The starting point should be the emissions per sector in 2000 and then the same reduction per sector, mutually exchanged via sale or lease.
Jan Willem 5 April 2020
Not surprising that Brabant is again the most energetic, but have they perhaps not seen that red spot on the satellite images above Brabant?
aria 6 April 2020
Maybe Mr. Hanekamp can explain what happens when
NH3 is exchanged to NOX but I think the pollution is increasing
then just go. Doesn't take away what the sector has already invested in reducing emissions while elsewhere there is still no knowledge of what is actually being emitted. There may really be a price tag if this all goes through.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register