TY Lim / Shutterstock.com

News Rabobank

Animal protein will not suffer from substitutes until 2035

June 28, 2021 - Linda van Eekeres - 13 comments

The impact of meat and dairy substitutes on the animal protein chains and the arable farming sector is still limited until 2035. Although the market for alternative proteins continues to grow, it will remain 'only' a niche market for the next 14 years. By 2035, meat and dairy substitutes will have a consumption share of approximately 4% and 9% in the European Union and the United Kingdom, respectively.

This is what Rabobank expects in the publication 'The protein transition has only just begun'. "It is true that the advance of meat and dairy substitutes will 'cost' the animal protein sectors a part of the expected turnover growth in the coming years. But we do not expect sales volumes to come under pressure. The same applies to the raw materials side," writes Sebastiaan Schreijen, Senior Analyst Consumer Food, and Harry Smit, Senior Specialist Farm Inputs & Farming at Rabobank. 

Consumer behavior is slowly changing
Existing raw material suppliers benefit from additional sales of meat and dairy substitutes, but the expected volumes do not yet offer tangible opportunities for grain, oilseed and legume growers and processors to enter en masse. According to the researchers, that could all change if the growth curve of meat and dairy substitutes becomes steeper than expected.

"However, consumer behavior is slowly changing, especially since meat and dairy have been on the menu for centuries." A higher consumption share of meat and dairy substitutes requires government intervention and groundbreaking innovations (e.g. protein fermentation or soaked meat) to drive down consumer prices, according to the Rabobank specialists. "We don't see that happening in the short term."

Although the researchers do not expect that meat and dairy substitutes will meet 25% of the protein requirement in 2035, they have calculated this scenario. For that share, dairy substitutes in Europe have to grow an average of 15% per year to a consumption volume of 13.000 kilotons. Because approximately half of all European milk is processed into cheese, the growth of cheese substitutes will have a major impact on the amount of milk to be produced. Then the demand for animal dairy could fall by about 20% (24 million tons) of dairy products compared to 2020.

Pork sector most vulnerable
To get to a consumption share of 25% in Europe, meat substitutes have to grow an average of 30% per year towards 11.000 kilotons in 2035. The expected impact in that scenario is about the same as that for the dairy sector. In the 25% scenario, the impact is not limited to processed meat, but muscle meat is also partly replaced.

"We expect the pork sector to be the most vulnerable. Poultry is cheaper, flexible in supply and closely aligned with expected consumer trends. Fish may benefit from the focus on healthier diets. Finally, we expect beef to have a relatively stable base, thanks to dairy farming and the limited alternative uses of grasslands."

25% scenario would be bad news for arable farmers
The strong growth of plant alternative proteins in the 25% scenario is bad news for arable farmers. In contrast to a growing demand for raw materials, Rabobank expects a declining demand for animal feed due to the reduction in the number of animals. "This will release many of the 60 million hectares of grain and oilseed acreage in Europe. "We estimate the expected net effect of the two opposing movements to be at least 7,6 million hectares in the 25% scenario."

It is estimated that about 70% of the area released is related to the cultivation of grains, rapeseed and sunflowers in Europe. The other 30% are mainly soybeans grown outside Europe. The increased demand for pulses, oilseeds, oats and grains as raw materials for protein alternatives only covers part of the loss of sales in animal feed, the analysts report.

Government intervention not a ready-made solution
The falling demand for animal feed, dairy and meat products in the 25% scenario also has a negative impact on the rural economy in Europe. "Part of the livestock farmers and the agricultural acreage will become redundant. Some grain and oilseed growers will then have to look for new crops or a new business model. That is also the dilemma for national and European governments, which may contribute to climate goals and healthier populations." , can create the necessary social and societal unrest locally, so government intervention is not a ready-made solution."

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
13 comments
Ruud Hendriks June 28, 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/article/10892994/dierlijk-protein-has-no-last-van-replacers-tot-2035]Animal protein will not be affected by substitutes until 2035[/url]
open quote ---- "25% scenario would be bad news for arable farmers. The strong growth of plant alternative proteins in the 25% scenario is bad news for arable farmers. Rabobank expects a declining demand for raw materials. demand for animal feed due to the reduction in the number of animals.” This frees up many of the 60 million hectares of grain and oilseed acreage in Europe. "We estimate the expected net effect of the two opposing movements to be at least 7,6 million hectares in the 25% scenario." ---- close quote. Aside from the major adjustments that this requires for growers, this also indicates that when the consumption of animal protein decreases, a lot of space is freed up for other cultivation purposes. An indication that the pressure to produce more per hectare to feed the world's population is not necessary when consumption patterns change. No one has to become a vegetarian right away.
Subscriber
Southwest June 28, 2021
We need to get to 25% lower production and 100% higher price.
Thomas June 28, 2021
Idd, the prices should just double in proportion to the costs, which have continued to rise in recent years.
Hank. June 29, 2021
Don't worry, according to the latest scientific calculations it appears, 1) If the whole world goes organic farming, and 2) If the whole world doesn't want to eat meat anymore! Then 25% of the world's population will die. And 25% more farmland is needed!
Subscriber
frog June 29, 2021
Be careful that you will not be charged for Genocide Ruud.
Subscriber
cm June 29, 2021
Hank. wrote:
Don't worry, according to the latest scientific calculations it appears, 1) If the whole world goes organic farming, and 2) If the whole world doesn't want to eat meat anymore! Then 25% of the world's population will die. And 25% more farmland is needed!
Let's introduce this immediately in the Netherlands, but with the restriction no food imports. The left always complains about the export of too much food, but now turn the tables. Can also 25 % of the inhabitants leave, no housing needed and many many more man-made environmental problems solved. Wonderful plan for Green left PvdD etc
It can freeze or thaw June 29, 2021
Hank. wrote:
Don't worry, according to the latest scientific calculations it appears, 1) If the whole world goes organic farming, and 2) If the whole world doesn't want to eat meat anymore! Then 25% of the world's population will die. And 25% more farmland is needed!

In any case, there will be no more unemployment if we all become organic.

North Korea or Cambodia from the 70s comes close.
gerard June 29, 2021
don't think the weeds will become a problem with gps camera hoeing and many more techniques
think the more to do in the fungi is not enough resistance to mildew and late blight
Ruud Hendriks 1 July 2021
@ Frog. I'm not worried about that charge. The fact that organic produces less on a global scale has a high (organic) content. The idea is based, among other things, on the 20% lower yield in modern western agriculture. In the tropics, many plots that convert actually go up in production. In addition, western agriculture still has to figure out how the current production level can be sustained. It is now high thanks in part to cheap and finite fertilizers (P and K from mines, N from fossil fuels). They will become scarce and therefore expensive. And also high because the soil quality is still OK but is under pressure. In the Netherlands it is still reasonable, it is no longer what it used to be, but in many other places it is declining. Just look at the current problems with soil and water in western US as a result of modern agricultural methods.
Subscriber
Drent 1 July 2021
Ruud, just a question, what kind of crop do they grow in the tropics? No country is the same in terms of weather, climate and soil, so you can't lump everything together. You then say that nitrogen is finite, so why is it now mandatory to have ad bleu engines, so as to drive even more nitrogen into the air.
gerard 1 July 2021
80% IN THE AIR IS NITROGEN that's not finished yet you still have to catch it
Ruud Hendriks 3 July 2021
A few additions to the questions/comments
@gerard. Nitrogen as a substance is not finite, but the way in which we can dispose of it is. The production of (nitrogen) fertilizer costs a lot of fossil energy, animals quickly become o, and we only have a limited supply of replacements.
@drent. No country is the same, that's exactly what I mean. "Organic yields less" is just shaving the whole world with the same brush, and it's not like that. Here (yet) but not everywhere.
gerard 3 July 2021
we've had nitrogen-fixing crops for a long time that could do that for us
there is only one problem people prefer to eat chips fries than beans and peas
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Analysis Enterprise

Rabobank lends less money to the agricultural sector

Interview Alex Datema (Rabobank)

New true value language offers farmers perspective

News Farmland

Rabo Transition Fund passes the billion mark, bulk goes to land

Background Half-year figures

Rabobank's sustainability fund starts running

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up