Shutterstock

News Analysis CNV

Shrinkage of livestock costs more than 30.000 people their jobs

15 July 2021 - Redactie Boerenbusiness - 11 comments

The decline in the Dutch livestock population could cost 33.000 people who work in agriculture and agribusiness their jobs. This concerns many employees in sparsely populated regions with little prospect of another job, has analyzed CNV† The union suggests that employees could be retrained to become nature and landscape managers, among other things.

In the analysis, the trade union did not include farmers who had to stop because of the consequences of the government's nitrogen policy. "In the discussion about livestock reduction, it is often about the farmers. But not about the employees in that sector. While a smaller livestock is a huge blow for them. At least 30.000 employees can be affected if the livestock shrinks," says Piet Fortuin, CNV President, in a statement. The union still speaks of a conservative estimate.

Related Sectors
Of the jobs that are lost, about a third are in agriculture, such as animal husbandry. Two thirds work in agribusiness, such as agricultural services (contracting), distribution, slaughterhouses and the animal feed industry. The CNV advocates a transition fund to prevent high unemployment in the agricultural sector.

"This concerns many people who work in sparsely populated regions where there is little prospect of new work. A move to the Randstad is drastic and, moreover, often unaffordable. If the government wants to reduce the livestock, it must therefore come up with a transition fund at the same time." Fortune said.

Features in wildlife management
From this transition fund, employees who lose their job in the agricultural sector can be retrained for other work. CNV sees many opportunities for this in the healthcare and transport sector. This is also work that is available all over the Netherlands. It is also exciting that CNV sees a future for these employees in nature and landscape management.

This area is basically the reason that agricultural companies have to stop. 'An example is the provision of services for nature and landscape management and water storage/purification. Opportunities for this are mainly located in the vicinity of nature reserves, peat meadow areas and the river area', CNV motivates the career opportunities. 

A third option is positions in social enterprises. According to CNV, these are multifunctional companies that produce other social values ​​and services in addition to food. Examples of this are care, recreation or education or organizing new connections between food production and consumers/citizens.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know
Comments
11 comments
15 July 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/agribusiness/article/10893275/krim-veestapel-kost- over-30000-mensen-hun-baan]Krim livestock costs more than 30.000 people their jobs[/url]
Maintaining the size of the pig herd is not important for the pig farmer. However, for the related companies and Wageningen University, these mainly earn from Massa is Kassa, and for the farmer, less Mass means more Kassa.

They argue in favor of maintaining the largest possible volume in pig farming, for example. This is very important for the revenue model.

These companies earn their money from volume and investing capital and exporting knowledge abroad (production relocation). This development makes our competitors strong and ensures that our sales markets are becoming saturated. It would be good if all related companies and educational institutions create a fund from which the farmer gets paid to maintain the volume in the market. The farmer facilitates the revenue model of these parties and there is nothing wrong with that. A comparable system as the product boards used to fund research, with the difference that the farmer is now paid for his role, for which there is no compensation from the market. Finally, we produce in a way that enables these parties to achieve optimum returns.

Production relocation takes place through knowledge sharing and the investment of capital by Dutch related companies abroad that is earned from the Dutch farmer. Has little to do with politics.

Fortunately, the warm remediation has been able to straighten out a bit, but unfortunately a 10% contraction of the Dutch pig sector in Europe is a drop in the ocean, net production in Europe (not even 1% European) is still growing sharply every year. .

Agricultural economists would prefer to see the self-sufficiency rate of the European sector decrease by 15% to a self-sufficiency rate of 110% in order to create a healthy European pig market. That 15% seems small, but is already well more than the total Dutch pig production. And to think that the Dutch periphery is still looking for growth opportunities for pig production abroad. The farmer is caught up in the war for market share that the companies on the periphery are competing with each other.


(example, google: Investing in the pig column in Hungary, Romania, Ukraine and Russia)

(example, google: Sector-Study-Pig-Chain-Argentina-2020) download the study.

google: who benefits most from 12 million pigs
Subscriber
Skirt 15 July 2021
I would also say that the population immediately shrinks considerably. Also provides significant nitrogen gain.
Subscriber
Dirk 17 July 2021
Kjol, from your reaction you can conclude that you have spent too long in too high a concentration of ammonia.

It's even simpler than you can imagine, ie if the population were to shrink, consumption would fall and the most favorable effect could be that 30000 migrant workers could return to their home countries.
But you didn't see the latter either, when the shoe industry, the shipbuilding, aircraft and mining industries left the Netherlands.
Livestock shrinkage won't even cause a ripple in GDP
Geert 17 July 2021
Most jobs in the sector are filled by foreign workers. And the jobs in relationship management, for example, add nothing and only increase costs.

Commercial advisers, information officers, account managers (relationship management) have the sole function of increasing the employer's market share. Rather invest that money in the quality of the product and the effectiveness of the sector, more earning capacity for the farmer so that a farmer can invest in the competitive position and a sustainable future. If that had happened in the past, there would now have been a much healthier sector.

Maarja Parssites (related farms) prefer to eat until the host (farmer) has died and then look for a new host to be able to parasitize.
Drikus 17 July 2021
Dear Geert It is in almost all branches where people have to work that the largest part is no longer Dutch who work there. That shouldn't be a problem when it comes to money. If all is well they pay wage tax here and the companies they work for earn from them and pay tax as well. So they have added value for our country. So if they weren't there and work wasn't done, it would in any case be of no benefit to the Netherlands. The other functions you mention have in one way or another built up a right to exist, This because they are used and that works because otherwise they would not have existed for a long time. No one is obliged to use these people . But rules and laws are becoming increasingly different and more complex . As these people who have science and knowledge in house , we usually can not ignore them . One can be well paid, the other is in the price of his product. The choice is up to the farmer whether he makes use of it . There is a lot of hidden employment in this sector that is directly linked to agriculture . And one must also take into account that they are also customers somewhere for knowledge and maintenance, etc. . So people also find their way out of there. You only know the effect when something is no longer there. If foreigners leave the south , the result can still assume numbers that may be even higher . Usually one pulls the other along.
Maikel 18 July 2021
You are absolutely right Geert, meetings in the economy are often followed by shifts in labor markets and financial developments. There is also a crying shortage of personnel in other sectors and the transition to other work will not be a problem. These developments will provide an impulse for other sectors and the Dutch economy. The foreign workers who are now working often change sectors or countries anyway, which is the advantage of the many flexible workers that are deployed in the sector.

18 July 2021
The field of activity of workers who can provide added value with scientific professional knowledge is already mainly international, just like that of the companies on the periphery.
shoemakers1 18 July 2021
I think it's always the case, if you don't want something that's good, and throw it away that you also lose what you do want, don't destructively kill an industry just because you hate that way of life, has happened many times in the past, but never turned out well
Gert 18 July 2021
shoemakers1 wrote:
I think it's always the case, if you don't want something that's good, and throw it away that you also lose what you do want, don't destructively kill an industry just because you hate that way of life, has happened many times in the past, but never turned out well
It is true shoemakers, there has always been too much work on shaping a climate in which the revenue models of the periphery can yield optimal results, and too little on how we can create a (primary) sector with a healthy future perspective and competitive position. And that has led to resistance and destruction.
Subscriber
Skirt 19 July 2021
Dirk wrote:
Kjol, from your reaction you can conclude that you have spent too long in too high a concentration of ammonia.

It's even simpler than you can imagine, ie if the population were to shrink, consumption would fall and the most favorable effect could be that 30000 migrant workers could return to their home countries.
But you didn't see the latter either, when the shoe industry, the shipbuilding, aircraft and mining industries left the Netherlands.
Livestock shrinkage won't even cause a ripple in GDP
Oh, let everyone do their part, including the immigrants.
info 19 July 2021
The fact that there will be 30.000 fewer places has been discussed for many years when we see that around the 70s the farmer had around 20 cows and 200 fattening pigs, which are now taken care of multiple times by one man. As a result, a lot of people are needed less for the same or even higher production. Man is being replaced by technology eg milking robots, automatic feeding systems for pigs and chickens.
I sometimes think the overproduction was caused by the technical progress after 1970, when not everyone had a phone, now the children of 6 years already have a smartphone with the whole world on it.
This technique will continue with improvements in the years after this and our products will be harvested more economically by robot-like machines look at the machines that no longer need a driver, tractors with headland manicment have been for sale for several years and are making their appearance or we like it or not it just goes on. As a result, I see a decrease in people working in agriculture in the future, and the cost price will be determined more by machine costs and less by labor costs.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register