Elliott Bignell / Shutterstock.com

Background Organic

Is the new CAP overshooting its targets?

30 August 2021 - Jurphaas Lugtenburg - 3 comments

Organic farming occupies a prominent position in the new Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). In Austria, where a relatively large proportion of farmers already work organically, there is a fear that the policy advocated by politicians in Brussels may actually backfire. 

In the flagships of the European Commission - the Farm to Fork and Biodiversity strategy - member states are instructed to use at least a quarter of the agricultural area for organic production. The European Parliament committees on Agriculture and the Environment will vote on the Farm to Fork strategy for the first time next Thursday.

Austria is far ahead of many other Member States in organic farming. Based on the number of farms, 23% is organic and they already cultivate more than a quarter of the total acreage of agricultural land, partly due to schemes for mountain farmers.

Exclusive support
Subsidies play an important role in the success of organic farming in Austria. 44% of the second pillar budget goes to support organic farmers. In the negotiations on the new CAP, Austria argued for strengthening the current content of the second pillar budget with a focus on organic farming and other ecological services. In other words, conventional companies can also claim additional subsidy if they provide additional services in the field of nature and the environment. That is no longer the exclusive preserve of organic farmers.

And therein lies the pain point. Various interest groups fear that this implementation of the new CAP in the national strategic plan will be bad for the organic sector in Austria. Livestock farms in particular have had to invest heavily in adapted barns to meet animal welfare standards. If conventional companies consume part of the subsidies, the organic companies will never be able to recoup the extra costs.

The idea that those extra costs have to be removed from the market, as the European Commission and the Austrian Ministry of Agriculture want, is seen as unrealistic by the advocates. The production and thus the intensity of the organic companies must increase in order to reduce costs and meet the extra demand, they say. That goes against the values ​​that biological stands for.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Jurphaas Lugtenburg

Is editor at Boerenbusiness and focuses mainly on the arable farming sectors and the feed and energy market. Jurphaas also has an arable farm in Voorne-Putten (South Holland). Every week he presents the Market Flash Grains
Comments
3 comments
Hank. 1 September 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/ artikel/10893907/schiet-het-nieuwe-glb-zijn-doelen-voorbij]Is the new GLB overshooting its targets? [/url]
The real situation : * If the whole world starts farming organically, and if the whole world stops eating meat, then 25-35% more farmland will be needed, and 20% of the world's population will die.!
gerard 1 September 2021
not eating meat seems impossible to me what to do with cows that have been milked and where do people get all that manure that is needed from
Subscriber
Qīngwā 1 September 2021
The problem is that the voting cattle from the big city no longer have any idea about food production, which is why they are now also talking about Jip and Janneke hug farming.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Background Skin

'Skal has come a long way, but is not there yet'

News GLB

Nature groups force investigation into CAP

Politics GLB

Advice: redistribute European agricultural subsidies

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register