Agriphoto

News Agricultural policy

WUR recommends using 30% CAP support for climate

17 September 2021 - Klaas van der Horst - 7 comments

From 2023, a new cabinet should preferably transfer about 30% of direct European income support for agriculture (first pillar) to the pot for other agriculture-related expenditure (second pillar). The aim is to achieve climate and nature targets. This is in a study by Wageningen University which is paid by the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality.

The report builds on, among other things, recommendations made in March by a series of officials employed by the General Administrative Service (report ABD Topconsult).

In round numbers, the plan amounts to €717 million in direct income support under the new European agricultural policy, an amount of €215 million will be deducted. This is intended to achieve goals in areas such as nitrogen reduction, raising the level in peat meadow areas and the construction of buffer zones around Natura 2000 areas. 

Loss of income
As a result of the new CAP, the average farmer will lose about €2023 per year from 2000. If the preferred variant in the WUR study were to be chosen, this would be at the cost of another €3.000 in direct income support per company per year. However, in some cases, such as for Veenkolonial arable farms, the difference amounts to more than €12.000 per company per year. 

The study acknowledges that this can have serious income implications for farms, but the authors also say the government is not responsible for the income of "individual farms."

From subsidy to pricing
The authors of the report also advise the cabinet to rely less on subsidies to allow agricultural companies to participate in a desired policy change. Instead, more efforts should be made to set standards and pricing (of emissions), it is stated. The idea is that farmers should be compensated for rewetting measures in the Veenweide area (80.000 hectares).

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

He is a dairy market specialist at DCA Market Intelligence. He researches market news and trends and interprets developments.
Comments
7 comments
Subscriber
sefO 17 September 2021
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/ artikel/10894209/wur-advisses-inzet-30-glb-steun-voor-climate]WUR recommends the use of 30% CAP support for climate[/url]
Coincidentally this year I cycled in and around the Fries Drentse Wold I looked out at how good nature looked and there is absolutely no question of deterioration, I have also seen how many beautiful medium-sized and large livestock farms are located around this area if these companies have to be killed for a legal problem then the European legal system should look at this (the Dutch legal system is as unreliable as the plague)
The NB areas have been horribly expanded in recent years and now a buffer around it again is pure theft this cannot be true, we must never let this happen
Karel 17 September 2021
Do our bright minds have to study so dearly to manipulate the cap amounts so that no one has more insight into the results.
A better question is who knows why the budget was created.
It seems to me to soften our backlog in wage costs, operating costs, ENVIRONMENT, social system, subsidies, etc. compared to Asia, Eastern Europe, South America, Africa etc.
Subscriber
frog 17 September 2021
read grab money for accidental pockets.
Subscriber
howl 17 September 2021
Does the WUR know that the GLB is based somewhere else, that is clear or not then, interfere necks bah.
Subscriber
epv 18 September 2021
Is the wur a private company? How much government money is involved? Shouldn't we shorten it?
south-east 18 September 2021
stop with that nonsense of even more to nature and climate....
I assure you 1 thing if even more of this budget is taken from the farmer at the expense of the farmer. And the farmer's product prices will remain as low in the future as they are now, we are heading straight for disaster!
a country perishes when one is no longer independent.
But then we can say we have 3 more types of flowers and we are 0,000000000000000% further with the climate goals.
you don't need any research for this.
Just look at the gas/energy situation, we are largely dependent on the Russians.
Does it make you as a country to bully every entrepreneur away under the guise of greenery and nature.............
Subscriber
quite coarse 19 September 2021
A bomb on that WUR mess.
Leftist bastard there, what are they meddling in.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background GLB

Should large farmers get subsidies or not?

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up