Province of Gelderland

News Van der Wal

Nitrogen minister does not hesitate to expropriate

1 April 2022 - Linda van Eekeres - 17 comments

The cabinet is finally saying goodbye to the voluntary purchase of peak loaders near Natura 2000 areas. Livestock farms that do not want to sell are expropriated. The transition fund with more than €17 billion for purchase will come into effect on July 1, 2023. Then it must also be determined per area what the task is there.

This is stated in the outline letter on nitrogen policy that Minister for Nature and Nitrogen Christianne van der Wal (VVD) sent to the House today. What the ultimate prospects are for agriculture, fellow minister Staghouwer (LNV) is working out before the summer.

Inescapable, with escalation mechanisms
As Van der Wal emphasized to the House before, the goals must be 'inevitable'. It therefore wants to incorporate 'escalation mechanisms' in its approach to reduce nitrogen emissions and improve nature. This comes into effect when objectives threaten not to be achieved in time. She writes: "If voluntary measures - including innovation, extensification, relocation or closure - do not yield sufficient results, I consider intervention necessary. More mandatory measures such as expropriation - instruments that are already available - are then on the table, in accordance with the applicable procedures."

Expropriation explained
The letter also provides a definition of expropriation for the sake of certainty: "Expropriation is a process in which the entire property of the entrepreneur is taken from the government concerned, including any associated land. In those cases, the entrepreneur receives compensation based on full compensation for the prevention of expropriation."

According to the minister, it must be clear in advance 'when and under what conditions this mandatory set of instruments will be used'. "This applies in particular to areas where nature is (strongly) overloaded. The honest story is that it will not be feasible in every area to only assume voluntary work. When (from the area process) it appears that a peak loader has no future has more, entrepreneurs will be given the opportunity to adjust or terminate their business operations through innovation, relocation and/or extensification or through voluntary stop schemes.

Area plans ready July 1, 2023
The area plans must be ready by 1 July 2023, according to the minister's timetable. The national government sets the frameworks and targets are formulated for each province (or parts thereof), which are derived from the national and international obligations in the field of nature, nitrogen, water and greenhouse gases. The PAS detectors are also included in the area plans. The commitment to inevitability also applies to the area process itself. Van der Wal: "If progress does not provide sufficient certainty with regard to the target achievement, I will intervene in the area process from the central government in my coordinating role. I will do this with priority in the areas that are in the worst condition and where the urgency is therefore greatest. to get the areas under the KDW (critical deposition value ed.)."

The transition fund with €25 billion until 2035 must also enter into force on 1 July 2023 at the latest. This includes €2030 billion until 13,8 and €2030 billion between 2035 and 3,7 for the purchase, financial impairment of land and the Water Framework Directive. From the perspective of stayers, there is €2030 billion in the pot until 4,3 and €2035 million in the period up to 943. We are currently working on the design of the fund.

What is the perspective for agriculture?
The minister agrees that farmers 'need clarity and consistency before making the necessary investments'. Van der Wal indicates that it is necessary within the nitrogen approach that there is quickly clarity for agricultural entrepreneurs about goals and frameworks and what instruments agricultural entrepreneurs have. Before the summer, fellow minister Henk Staghouwer (LNV) will therefore work out the perspective for agriculture.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
17 comments
Subscriber
Jan1 1 April 2022
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/ artikel/10897623/stikstofminister-aarzelt-not-to-expropriate]Stikstofminister does not hesitate to expropriate[/url]
Unfortunately, given the current milk prices, I don't think there is much interest.
Taking inflation into account, cash is not attractive at the moment.
Subscriber
sefO 1 April 2022
Those peak loaders all have a proper permit and now it is pretended that they are engaged in criminal activities while the rest of the enterprising Netherlands hardly has a permit, it is almost criminal what the government does to the farmers with a few substandard ministers. the government itself created legal problem,
all downright nasty!!
Subscriber
howl 2 April 2022
what a damn cursed rotten bitch
Subscriber
boer 3 April 2022
That whole word expropriation gives me the shivers. if they were to force me to shut down my business for such a nonsense reason. I don't vouch for myself
Subscriber
Joop 3 April 2022
I'm here to help you drive out the left scum!
Subscriber
Jaap Haanstra 3 April 2022
Dear people,

The Netherlands seems to still be a free country.
Anyone who wants to live in the Netherlands can buy a farm
That applies to the bakery, to the shop lady, the teacher etc
You go to the bank, you go to a farmer and buy his land.
After that you can and may do with that farm what you want
Of course within the existing rules and laws.
Yes, even the government can buy land.
And where there is a proven public interest, a sitting farmer may be expropriated after the maximum effort has been made to reach an agreement with him.
Then the N drama.
The justification provided by the minister for buying out or expropriating farmers is simply staggering.
The KDW is scientifically insufficient, Aerius calculation model is not sufficient, no soil measurements, correlation "intended" nature restoration and measures not demonstrated, etc.

If it is clear that, on the basis of this kind of juggling with figures, there can be no question of a situation where expropriation could take place

So if the government wants to buy land, it can and is allowed to do so. Regardless of whether it makes me happy

But let it be clear there can be no question of expropriation.
And let's stand together as farmers

Regards Jaap Haanstra
Subscriber
Jantje 3 April 2022
Indeed, clear story. What bothers me is that agriculture is always seen as a problem. Agriculture produces food, a basic necessity of life, while a steel factory in IJmuiden emits too much nitrogen, CO2 and all kinds of carcinogenic substances and apparently may continue to do so without even mentioning expropriation.
Claas 4 April 2022
It's not left wing but right wing that is at the helm here.
If Ms vd Wal wants to tackle companies, I would like to see whether all those real estate BVs with their estates in Wassenaar and Bloemendaal are also eligible for construction sites.
steadfast 4 April 2022
Dear Jaap Haanstra, there is no longer any question of freedom; there are countless examples that demonstrate this. And there will absolutely be expropriation, even if it would not be legally correct. This government has already acted against the law several times and will not make an exception here either. Look at the whole, look at agenda 2030 / the great reset, and it will become clear to you that this agenda is followed to perfection; especially when there is no resistance from the population. And it is precisely the latter that is missing lately.
Subscriber
in hiding 4 April 2022
Jaap Haanstra wrote:
Dear people,

The Netherlands seems to still be a free country.
Anyone who wants to live in the Netherlands can buy a farm
That applies to the bakery, to the shop lady, the teacher etc
You go to the bank, you go to a farmer and buy his land.
After that you can and may do with that farm what you want
Of course within the existing rules and laws.
Yes, even the government can buy land.
And where there is a proven public interest, a sitting farmer may be expropriated after the maximum effort has been made to reach an agreement with him.
Then the N drama.
The justification provided by the minister for buying out or expropriating farmers is simply staggering.
The KDW is scientifically insufficient, Aerius calculation model is not sufficient, no soil measurements, correlation "intended" nature restoration and measures not demonstrated, etc.

If it is clear that, on the basis of this kind of juggling with figures, there can be no question of a situation where expropriation could take place

So if the government wants to buy land, it can and is allowed to do so. Regardless of whether it makes me happy

But let it be clear there can be no question of expropriation.
And let's stand together as farmers

Regards Jaap Haanstra
Then on the barricades
off to The Hague
Where are the new people with knowledge of business and the mentality of e.g. Haanstra's and Dijktra's
Subscriber
Southwest 5 April 2022
Won't run that fast. I think farmers everywhere would rub their hands if they could hand over to the rich. When I see poverty dripping off everywhere in the Netherlands, I think that for many, sale or expropriation is more of a redemption than a punishment.
Subscriber
crow 5 April 2022
Be careful with that idea of ​​Southwest, if you are obliged to give up your farm and receive less than what you would like to sell it for. Then you can not start again in a different place, then that is sour and sad.
Subscriber
cm 5 April 2022
According to the minister, the largest peak loaders will be dealt with first and these are generally the larger modern companies that have invested a lot, so why so attractive.
Subscriber
pieter 5 April 2022
I think it's a strange story of that nitrogen, which stays within the limits of ned and sand from the sahara we get here. I think that sometimes some nitrogen comes from abroad.
Subscriber
Southwest 5 April 2022
crow wrote:
Be careful with that idea of ​​Southwest, if you are obliged to give up your farm and receive less than what you would like to sell it for. Then you can not start again in a different place, then that is sour and sad.
If you start talking to the ministry, there is more possible than meets the eye. In any case, I only know winners among expropriated farmers. So to speak 'on fire, out of the fire'.
Subscriber
Drent 5 April 2022
Yet it remains strange, here is a nature reserve which is exceptional for Europe because there are animals and plants that do not occur elsewhere, while there are livestock farms around.
Subscriber
CM 5 April 2022
Southwest wrote:
crow wrote:
Be careful with that idea of ​​Southwest, if you are obliged to give up your farm and receive less than what you would like to sell it for. Then you can not start again in a different place, then that is sour and sad.
If you start talking to the ministry, there is more possible than meets the eye. In any case, I only know winners among expropriated farmers. So to speak 'on fire, out of the fire'.
I'd rather sell myself than be forced to sell. The amount is not that for housing or roads, but for nature, so even free traffic value will not touch with the restriction of not being allowed to farm again, which is completely ridiculous.
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up