Agriphoto

News Nitrogen

Low-emission stable under guardianship until new judgment

7 September 2022 - Klaas van der Horst - 2 comments

From now on, low-emission barns must be subject to an appropriate assessment that shows that nature is not harmed. For permit granting, use may no longer be made of the emission factors approved so far by the government for certain types of low-emission barns. This is what the Council of State judged on appeal concerning three dairy farms in the province of Utrecht. This means that these dairy farms cannot expand for the time being.

This concerns the granting of new nature permits for two types of dairy barns, types A1.13 and A1.28. The statements mean that emission factors for this types of stables may no longer be used for granting nature permits. The statements do not concern other low-emission barn systems in the dairy sector, nor do they concern low-emission barns in the poultry and pig sector.  

The Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Council of State indicates that it is aware that this will make licensing in the dairy sector even more difficult, "but the strict European nature conservation rules to which the Netherlands has committed itself do not allow for a different outcome," it said. put. It is therefore important, according to the department, that the research announced by the Minister of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality into the effectiveness of low-emission stables quickly provides clarity.

This requires the Experts Committee on the Fertilizers Act (CDM) to come up with further advice for the optimum operation of the low-emission barn types, but the Council states that an appropriate assessment and preliminary testing are still necessary.

The case was brought by Coöperatie Mobilization for the Environment (MOB) and Vereniging Leefmilieu.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

He is a dairy market specialist at DCA Market Intelligence. He researches market news and trends and interprets developments.
Comments
2 comments
Subscriber
Zeeuw 7 September 2022
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/article/10900477/emissiearme-stal-under-curatele-tot-new-judgment]Low-emission stable under receivership until new judgment[/url]
Vollebroek is right: ask the RvS to ask the European Court of Justice what is allowed, the Advocate General answers, the RvS delivers justice because the circle is complete. An appeal is not possible. Only Pietin can blow the matter up. But there is hope for farmers! If I am well informed, the measurement of the emissions from these stables is based on scientific research by the CBS
You read that right, CBS with UvAmsterdam. You don't know it yet, but LTO will investigate this further. The N analysis for all houses does not appear to differ from 10000 manure samples, so that it is concluded that the house floor type cannot be distinguished. Question 1: is this scientific research reliable: No Because the variation between companies is greater than the floor effects of innovation stables. So the judge also gets to work with this and Vollebroek just laughs. The solution is simple WUR can use their expertise on reliable tests to demonstrate the effect on that company . So what effect the floor has. The feed management on the farm is also taken into account. Ask WUR for the test setup and the company lab crop research for the N analyzes if WUR doesn't have time. TNO may also want to participate. Vollebroek we will get to where you are not wanted!
Subscriber
Zeeuw 8 September 2022
Vollebroek is right: ask the RvS to ask the European Court of Justice what is allowed, the Advocate General answers, the RvS delivers justice because the circle is complete. An appeal is not possible. Only Pietin can blow the matter up. But there is hope for farmers! If I am well informed, the measurement of the emissions from these stables is based on scientific research by the CBS
You read that right, CBS with UvAmsterdam. You don't know it yet, but LTO will investigate this further. The N analysis for all houses does not appear to differ from 10000 manure samples, so that it is concluded that the house floor type cannot be distinguished. Question 1: is this scientific research reliable: No Because the variation between companies is greater than the floor effects of innovation stables. So the judge also gets to work with this and Vollebroek just laughs. The solution is simple WUR can use their expertise on reliable tests to demonstrate the effect on that company . So what effect the floor has. The feed management on the farm is also taken into account. Ask WUR for the test setup and the company lab crop research for the N analyzes if WUR doesn't have time. TNO may also want to participate. Vollebroek we will get to where you are not wanted!
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Enterprise

Rabobank positive about nitrogen plan budget

BBTV Ger Koopmans (LTO)

The minister has severely damaged my trust.

Opinions Jaap Uenk

GVE standard frustrates future of dairy farming

Opinions Lubbert van Dellen

The biggest sticking point of the nitrogen letter lies in land-based requirements.

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up