Ghost Rotgers

Background Nitrogen Mood

Have a chat or wait for state elections?

6 January 2023 - Klaas van der Horst - 4 comments

The consultations on a broad agricultural agreement (which is actually a disguised nitrogen consultation) will be in full swing again in the coming weeks. In recent weeks, Minister Adema has sometimes said that agreement is not necessarily necessary before the provincial elections. A deal for that time suits the cabinet very well.

Stretch or stop? The current government coalition would like to take some kind of act before March 15. A lot can be discussed in a period of ten weeks. Stretch or stop? The agricultural parties who are allowed to join Wouter de Jong at the main or side table are dubious about the question of what is sensible to do: keep discussing, see what can still be achieved and, in the meantime, possibly 'stretch' until after the state elections or drop out soon . Opinions are divided. LTO chairman Sjaak van der Tak has already indicated that he wants to talk further in any case. Parties such as Biohuis and Netwerk Grondig are also on the same page. Organizations such as Agractie and the Dutch Dairy Farmers Union are more critical.

Van der Wal-like
Incidentally, a remarkable, albeit small, bump has occurred in the consultation line between The Hague and Agractie in recent weeks. A former hired employee at the large Malieveld protest of Agractie on October 1, 2019, also an SGP member, switched to the department shortly afterwards as spokesperson for Minister Christianne van der Wal. That was until then, but when he subsequently turned in at the end of November last year an interview also rather 'Van der Wal-esque' about the nature and water quality, the SGP and the Agractie supporters were chatting their ears. It didn't help for a good atmosphere around the meeting.

Provinces must do it
Many farmers' organisations, and certainly their supporters, prefer to wait for the state elections and then do - or try to do - business with the new boards. It can be expected that they have a considerably changed composition. Some see the recent 'ultimatum' from Overijssel to The Hague (€5 billion extra for reorganization of the province) as a promising first step. After all, the provinces are responsible for the organization of the rural area. The Hague does make plans and intentions may be expressed in a coalition context, but the cabinet itself does not have the instruments to enforce matters. The legislative instruments for this were handed over long ago. The Hague has the money, but that alone is not enough.

Designation of new areas
Christianne van der Wal, the Minister of Nitrogen and Nature, meanwhile still has something of her own set of instruments. It is its authority to designate additional nature areas and to increase their protection status. Special in its latest designation of 101 nature areas as areas with a higher protection status that she first made that designation in Brussels and subsequently made it known in the Netherlands itself. Not much publicity has been given to this, by the way. There was an announcement in the Government Gazette and that was it. However, there is still the possibility to object, which the Province of Friesland has used, among others.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

He is a dairy market specialist at DCA Market Intelligence. He researches market news and trends and interprets developments.
Comments
4 comments
Subscriber
anna 7 January 2023
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10902380/doortafelen-of-wachten-op-statenverkiezingen]Walk through the table or wait for state elections?[/url]
Those who think that a nitrogen agreement before the provincial council elections are granted are not entirely realistic. This problem has been going on for 40 years. The first measures regarding nitrogen (injecting grassland) were already implemented in the XNUMXs. This matter is so deep that it will take several years before real solutions are found. And the solution is deep! Forty years doing nothing/too little. For forty years solutions have been devised with a compromise, and it is precisely this compromise that costs every farmer claws of money every day, ie a cost price increase. This cost price increase is then solved by scaling up (this has also been advised for years by the banks and LTO). Now so many years later, the companies have grown so large that especially the banks have so much money in them that they are also against drastic measures, it now also costs them a lot of money if real measures are implemented. And the government is blamed for everything. But is it the government's fault? There are "farmers' parties" who have been telling the sector a "sausage" for years, like: nothing is wrong. While these "farmers' parties" have an interest in pushing solutions forward. After all, moving forward means preserving votes!
Subscriber
Zeeuw 9 January 2023
Of course dining! It is important to review the table formation progress at the end of this month
And with the background. Attention is paid to a limited number of points that the sector wants and what the region's offer of the province/government is in this regard. Also the balance for potential buy-back - released N kton - and its destination. Thirdly, the Van der Wal action to force 101 new additions to Natura 2000 down the throat and the effect of this in the province. Fourth: the revenue model presented in the region. Look, then you have something for the voters to substantiate their choice. I would also inform the voters that Van der Wal first reports in Brussels and only then with the region. About the water quality it can be said that not agriculture but the many medicines and Pfas occur in almost 100% of the sample locations, in contrast to the so-called fertilizers NO3 and P!
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 12 January 2023
What is the input of the Dutch Universities and Institutes such as TNO in Delft in this issue of Nitrogen, Nature, Agricultural Sectors about how we should proceed? Are there any Dutch studies going on at all?
According to the 14 January 2023
Start by putting the following question on the table: why are low-nitrogen heaths chosen as a reference, and not the originally present deciduous forests?
The eu wants to restore nature. Fine, but why not the nature of 1000 years ago? The current natura2000 areas are mostly old heaths that have become low in nitrogen through centuries of nitrogen extraction (sheep manure and sods). It's crazy to take these emaciated nitrogen-poor areas as a reference. It is much more logical to take the deciduous forests present 1000 years ago as a reference. These were relatively rich in nitrogen and have no problem with nitrogen deposition from agriculture, traffic and industry. This would solve the nitrogen problem in one fell swoop. In my opinion, the fact that these kinds of facts are not even a subject of discussion indicates that it is not about nitrogen at all, but only about the reduction of intensive agriculture / livestock farming. With this we are witnessing a kind of show whose outcome is unfortunately already known.

According to the
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up