Agriphoto

Background Manure

Strict manure rules affect livestock farmers and arable farmers

23 January 2023 - Klaas van der Horst - 12 comments

Arable farmers and dairy farmers must comply with a number of cultivation requirements of the European Commission this year. Such as earlier sowing of catch crops, wider manure-free and crop protection-free buffer strips and stricter manure application standards in a large part of the country.

This is necessary to maintain a transitional derogation for the Netherlands up to and including 2025. Minister Piet Adema of LNV writes this in a letter to the House of Representatives. He had indicated at the end of December that the soup should be eaten a little less hot as far as he was concerned, but the European environment commissioner Virginius Sinkevicius opposed this. He is particularly concerned about Dutch water quality. The figures he has on this do not reassure him. He therefore put the knife to Adema's throat: either stricter measures immediately, or no transitional derogation at all.

Arable crops
Adema therefore saw no choice but to opt for the first option, he writes to the House of Representatives. This threatens to hit hard for arable crops in particular. A catch crop must be sown before 1 October, except for winter crops. Those who fail to comply will face sanctions. Adema is looking at how to ease the pain for this year's cultivation plans.

In addition, wider buffer strips must be maintained along waterways, strips where fertilizers and crop protection may not be applied. Adema wants to quickly clarify this through the so-called Environmental Management Activities Regulation. The regulation will take effect on 1 March. For the longer term, the minister is aiming for uniform buffer strips for manure, crop protection and CAP. The minister wants to clarify this before 1 January next year.

Nutrient-polluted
As a final measure, nutrient-polluted (NV) areas will be set up as of this year. Here the water quality is particularly at stake and the derogation is being phased out more quickly. There, the nitrogen application standards must be reduced by an additional 2025% by 20. These areas will be determined as of 1 January next year and include the regions Sand South, Central and the loess area. For this year, three areas at water board level have been designated as NV. This concerns the North Holland Noorderkwartier, Delfland and Brabantse Delta.

42% of the agricultural area
According to the minister, this involves 42% of the Dutch agricultural area. A lower derogation regime will apply there, an obligation to sow a catch crop and grassland may not just be torn up.

The measures have provoked anger and protest among agricultural organisations. The House of Representatives also has questions. The issue would also be discussed today at the main table consultation on an agricultural agreement, the parties report. LTO Netherlands already protested on Friday. Agractie also made it clear that it was very unpleasantly surprised.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

He is a dairy market specialist at DCA Market Intelligence. He researches market news and trends and interprets developments.
Comments
12 comments
Subscriber
Drent 23 January 2023
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10902593/stricte-manure-rules-raken-veehouder-en-akkerbouwer]Strict manure rules affect cattle-farmers and arable farmers[/url]
why does arable farming have to bleed for this to solve the problems in livestock farming? Moreover, the water in our province is already far below the standard, so I don't understand the problem.




Subscriber
ape 23 January 2023
Everyone will bleed for these green and concrete gray communists.
Subscriber
sefO 23 January 2023
The problem is that we have and have had a bunch of weak ass ministers.
The Netherlands wants to innovate and that requires ministers who want to build instead of demolish.
ministers with knowledge and skills who can cope with Brussels.
The Dutch farmers are steadily working on the quality of the product and the environment in which cultivation must take place. no nonsensical Brussels regulations fit in with that.
Subscriber
Zeeuw 23 January 2023
As an entrepreneur, I would not accept restrictive measures for regions where people are easily below the standard. Certainly not from Brussels. Make that clear to your organization. If they don't want to defend that point of view, you have to find or set up a new organization that wants to defend it. If you don't do this, the farm is done. There is first proper consultation with sector representatives and otherwise that's it!
Subscriber
ideas 23 January 2023
I would start by reassessing the water quality numbers. Because there is a fairly good chance that those figures are slightly away from the truth. Unfortunately, that is how it works today.
Subscriber
time bomb 23 January 2023
Let's work/cooperate to get rid of this mess. crap.
Subscriber
No character 23 January 2023
Recognized Laboratory to take samples every month at fixed measuring points. notarial fixed
lay. Good is good and not good is taking measures.
Subscriber
innovative 23 January 2023
what if you just do nothing and continue as you always did and do not apply for payment entitlements. what happens then. I don't think they can take them away and just give them a fine?
those few hundred euros per ha can frankly be stolen from me. let them relax
Subscriber
Zeeuw 23 January 2023
The measurements around your company must then be in the safe zone. If you can have that determined by an independent lab, then you are in a strong position. However, general regulations by law do apply to the company I think! But the idea is great!
Subscriber
Drent 24 January 2023
inno wrote:
what if you just do nothing and continue as you always did and do not apply for payment entitlements. what happens then. I don't think they can take them away and just give them a fine?
those few hundred euros per ha can frankly be stolen from me. let them relax
That's exactly how I feel about it, don't request anything anymore, with these prices we don't need that either and it's also taxable, so what do you end up with? Without our data, it will be much more difficult for the government to carry out checks, send us, etc.
Hans Kuypers 24 January 2023
I agree with farmers that they have not been lucky with the Minister of Agriculture twice now. Trying to please farmers always ends badly. He thinks that because the entire approach to livestock farming in this government hangs together like loose sand. If you find something, make a good and coherent plan, present it to the farmers and make clear agreements. Sending a nitrogen card into the world is really not enough. The farmers may be expected to think constructively and cooperate in solutions. That is quite complicated if it means, for example, that you have to take a step back, but the situation is so complex that it seems inevitable. In return, governments and the agricultural industry will have to impose positive sanctions. In short, what we need is a new Sicco Mansholt, practical and with vision
Subscriber
Zeeuw 24 January 2023
AND own vision on the table and no chatter for 10 years.
Drafting changes together and not being manipulated by 100% bio-ecologists' points of view. Participation in Authority land-nature and delegating ecologists with a BROAD nature-agriculture vision.



You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up