HAK

Interview Timo Hoogeboom (HAK)

'Radical change for 15% organic is necessary'

28 January 2023 - Linda van Eekeres - 66 comments

HAK, the largest vegetable manufacturer in the Netherlands, wants to make the entire range grown in our country for the Dutch market organic within five years. The switch is already underway. In 2027, consumers in the supermarket will no longer have a choice: those who buy canned vegetables or legumes from HAK automatically choose organic. Foodbusiness spoke to Timo Hoogeboom, CEO of HAK, about this ambitious plan.

The cultivation of HAK is already On the Way to PlanetProof. CEO Timo Hoogeboom sees the switch to organic as a necessary next step. "The actual costs of using fertilizers and plant protection products are passed on to the next generations."

Hoogeboom sees an important task for producers and retailers in making the switch, but also calls on the government to take measures. "In order for the Netherlands to meet the ambition of 15% of the agricultural area organic in 2030, we have to make radical changes." In short: according to the CEO, 'there must be some action in the taxi from that angle'.

You are already starting to switch and in 2027 the Dutch cultivation of crops for HAK must be organic. This puts you ahead of the market. What is your motivation?
"We see a need for the next step. The Dutch soil has been overburdened for the past sixty years and in the future we also want to be able to grow sufficient and resilient crops in the Netherlands. The share of organic agricultural land in the Netherlands is only 4%. As the largest As a vegetable and legume manufacturer, we believe it is our job to kick-start the debate.Five years ago, we took the step from regular cultivation to On the Way to PlanetProof, with extra-statutory requirements for, among other things, the quality of the soil, biodiversity, water management and energy consumption. Since last year, all local cultivation has been converted to this. This is actually a follow-up step. The Skal organic quality mark is also internationally certified and we can also carry that certificate in Germany and Belgium."

How will the switch work, will the current growers have to switch or will you be looking for new growers?
"It is a five-year process. We will do the beets first this year. Then we will choose a number of crops that will be grown organically in the coming years. We want to convert the current PlanetProof growers. There will certainly also be growers who don't want that, because it concerns a small part of their yield and they don't necessarily want to grow organically. With possible new growers you should think of growers who grow something else today and want to switch and also organic growers who are looking for more We now grow within a radius of 125 kilometers (from Giessen, North Brabant, ed.) We may loosen that distance a little more in the long term, because Groningen and Friesland also offer good opportunities for organic cultivation. local. Given the nitrogen problem, we expect that the number of farmers looking for new ways of farming will grow. Organic is attractive because of conversion subsidies. It is important that those growers also have certainty about sales for the coming years, which is why we want to work with long-term agreements of five years or longer."

About 85% of the vegetables and legumes that come from Dutch soil are converted into your vision. Where does the other 15% come from and is there an organic ambition for that?
"These are crops that cannot be grown climatologically in the Netherlands. White beans and white beans in tomato sauce are an important product, they need a continental climate. We don't have a commitment to converting the other 15% at the moment, we start close by because we know the growers here well and can guide them. We are, however, increasingly concerned with what we can grow in the Netherlands: kidney beans and edamame, young soybeans, also look interesting."

The home market is 100 million consumers, mainly in Northwest Europe. Is the biological ambition also aimed at other countries?
"We have now expressed the ambition for what we grow in the Netherlands for the Dutch market, but we also expect to grow organically in our home markets of Germany and Belgium. Through chain transparency you can properly separate where what comes from."

Growers who switch can also receive a subsidy from the Organic Agriculture Action Plan, but HAK will also pay extra rewards to growers who make the transition to organic. With the high inflation, consumers are more often choosing on price. Are vegetables and legumes also becoming more expensive?
"As HAK, we don't determine the consumer price, the retailer does that. It's impossible to say anything about that now. There are so many factors at play, such as energy and geopolitics. What I can say is: when you don't succeed If you want to keep organic affordable for a large public, then HAK's plan and that of the government will not succeed. Because it must be accessible to everyone. In addition, you can look at the price side in two ways. You can also say: the bottom is not allowed be this cheap for longer. In the Netherlands, everything is expressed in price. I think we should view the price much more in the light of the actual social costs. Future generations will pay that price."

HAK has had a Russian owner since June 2021, who transferred the company from KDV Group to the more internationally operating Flexway a few months ago. Is he behind the new strategy?
"At HAK we have a totally autonomous management and complete autonomy over the strategy, but the shareholder agrees. There was synergy during the takeover by KDV, but due to the geopolitical situation in Ukraine that was no longer applicable With Flexway, a way has been found to guarantee stability. It also includes companies from America, Croatia and Dubai."

The demand is still lagging behind the supply of organic, so that organic products are sometimes even sold as conventional. What needs to be done to stimulate demand?
"Organic is now too exclusive. The demand side really needs to be stimulated; the consumer needs to be better explained why organic is better. And as suppliers (retailers and manufacturers) we have to make the choice whether we should use non-sustainable crops grown far away. The actual costs of using fertilizers and plant protection products are thus passed on to the next generations. I see an important task there for producers and for supermarkets, such as a Plus that only offers organic dairy with its private label. But also interest groups such as Greenpeace have a role to play. The 'plofkip' has disappeared partly because of Wakker Dier. Now you only see at least 1 star Better Life."

What can the government do to stimulate organic?
"It took us thirty years to reach 4% organic acreage and slightly more organic supply in the supermarket. In order for the Netherlands to meet the ambition of 15% organic in 2030, we have to change radically. There are quite a few measures but that requires courageous politicians. It is the law of madness: expecting different outcomes while doing the same thing."

"The government can offer attractive transitional arrangements for farmers. You could set the VAT rate, which is currently 9%, to 0%. Ultimately, higher taxes can also be levied on crop protection and fertilizer, so that those who use it have to include it in the cost price. But I also think that we should get to the point where supermarkets simply no longer have to offer an alternative to organic. If you look at Denmark and Austria, entire categories are only offered organically.."

When you presented the plan last week (January 16) at Bioknowledge week, you emphatically called on other food producers, growers, supermarkets and the government to participate in increasing organic production and consumption. Have you already received responses?
"A lot. That is special. Growers have registered and we are receiving responses from people from organic cultivation who want to help, also from retired organic growers who want to share knowledge. We have received responses from various quarters, including from the government But something has to be done from that angle action in the taxi come. Now all tables are discussing an agricultural agreement. But something also needs to happen instead of talking, talking, talking; otherwise things won't improve radically."

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
66 comments
Subscriber
Gijsbertus 28 January 2023
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10902678/radical-change-for-15-organic-is-necessary]''Radical change for 15% organic is necessary'[/url]
if you want to go for gold, fine.
but then you don't have to piss off the honest current product.
as it is now written by mr hak, a criminal way of growing plants is common. and greenpeace will tell us how we should do it.
I think boycott that heel. let those guys from greenpeace work for you, or those guys can't do anything with their hands.
Subscriber
frog 28 January 2023
Went to the supermarket yesterday, Hak products already cost 40% more than the private label, this will only increase with their plans, fortunately, consumers are already leaving Hak products.
Subscriber
Leo 28 January 2023
Just have it done yourself
They know a lot about it, don't they?
They know exactly how to do it, so that's convenient.
The factory HAK is currently owned by a Russian.
So I do understand that they are used to doing it this way.
Just say how you want it
Subscriber
frog 28 January 2023
Hak's best man probably won't have time to respond today, he must be busy blocking the A12 with his friends!
Subscriber
ajetoo 28 January 2023

Botor on the head, growers fobbed off with a tip and in the supermarket the vegetables from chop already cost twice as much as from the private label.
Organic farmers will soon be able to grow for regular prices, oh wait, that is already the case because there is no demand for multiple organic vegetables.

That will be nice harrowing and crawling to pick the weeds in the carrot.
fortunately there are many new fellow countrymen who would like to do this.
Subscriber
euro 28 January 2023
grown years before chopping, but if you want to profile your company in this way, there is now a chopping jar in the stock cupboard for the last time.
what an arrogance to put it away like this, nice and on the way to planetproof
feel free to act normal. I'm done with registering everything lumps of paper work.
now the bank will do another screening to see if you are registered correctly, the ink from the previous screening hasn't even dried yet.
Subscriber
truth 28 January 2023
boycott such a Russian company! they are destroyed by their success in this way, the factory does not keep running ... and the consumer is already tight enough and goes for common in this time of crisis!
Subscriber
jk 28 January 2023
oh well, with this strategy heel will be one of those disappeared brand from the past in a few years. This offers opportunities for others in the canned sector. Perhaps a good time to start processing with a group of growers. Local and short lines are becoming increasingly important for consumers
Subscriber
January 28 January 2023
we don't buy heel anymore
Subscriber
Hakkie 28 January 2023
You must have Hak's regards, that's all there is to it.
Subscriber
sefO 28 January 2023
The well-known communist system, "imposing your will from above"
Old communist countries crave freedom and we in the Netherlands are introducing it.
People consumers think because the government has been showing communist traits for some time and now the industry is starting to show such traits, an argument is certainly it has not been shown for the time being that organic is better than usual
Subscriber
Curator 28 January 2023
last step before the plug goes out heel! resolves itself that way.
Subscriber
Poker 28 January 2023
where you chop, chips fall.

don't call us anymore, this interview will speed up the heel ankle transition. no regular farmer wants to grow for their next season.

final greetings from heel
Subscriber
Roy 28 January 2023
pride comes before a fall. Organic is no better. Quickly get it from abroad Hak. You become way too expensive with lesser quality
Subscriber
john d. 28 January 2023
populism and polarization, that is t
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 28 January 2023
Well, we don't seem to learn anything from the real organic companies, their production and sales protocols and why and how they serve an almost permanent clientele. There is a myopia that assumes that you can grow some crops "organically" and not others on the same farm. How can you only declare part of a company organic and the rest not and this is one of the reasons why the entire organic certification process is so vulnerable. I dare say that the company as a whole must work organically in order to be certified as such. The current complete dependence of producers and consumers on retailers (supermarkets) is essentially very unhealthy for both the producer and the consumer.
Both should be able to benefit from more and better food, and I think that means that the entire food chain needs to be overhauled. Science-based advice is much needed in this area!
Subscriber
grape 28 January 2023
louise, I now read , more and better food.
is that your experience with organic products?

it is no more than that if we switch to organic and better is also very debatable in my opinion
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 28 January 2023
My name is neither grape nor louise, but I assume you made a typing error. As for more and better food, yes I mean, knowing that there are huge misconceptions about how you can indeed produce more and better food in an organic way.
Hypark 28 January 2023
What an egoist, he has never spoken to a grower himself, and they buy preserves through third parties of whom they do not speak to a grower. Trying to only ask high prices from the retail in order to make more money yourself, this is in itself a noble goal as an entrepreneur, please don't add organic bullshit.
Sales of the planet proof are already 15% less than planned!!
Subscriber
Tenner 28 January 2023
I give Hak another 5 years. Then it's past. What a huge nonsense that is biologically healthier than usual
Grower 28 January 2023
In order to comply with the organic standard in 2027, the transition will have to be made in 2024 or 2025 for agricultural land. Will still have to search 1/3rd of the area. Risky crops for low margins, I can't imagine current conventional growers going along with this
Subscriber
Skirt 28 January 2023
It's fine that they want this. They're just looking at it.
also trader 28 January 2023
The Belgians will charge things, just like with the fries industry
Subscriber
Henk 28 January 2023
Boycott that Hak.
Worthless story.
the grower who still wants to grow for that in 2023 has no balls !!
Subscriber
Hank. 29 January 2023
Once again ; If the whole world wants to go organic, we need 45-50% more farmland, and about 10-20% of the world's population will die!
Subscriber
frog 29 January 2023
the canning factories are those manufacturers who, if the carrot is worth zero cents, stuff every can with cheap product without even asking for a single certificate?
Subscriber
Act 29 January 2023
responsibly common. That makes sense.
Mister Hak says so himself. Organic is still too expensive at the moment. They will change that by squeezing the organic grower.
Subscriber
green yellow 29 January 2023
Let the market do its job.
Maybe they come with such high contract prices that it will be profitable for us to hoe by hand.
Subscriber
Bio + 29 January 2023
Well, why does this subject evoke so much emotion among the BB commenters? You would almost think it is about fear. Fear of the (minimum) 85% for the (maximum) 15%.
It can freeze or thaw 29 January 2023
bio+ wrote:
Well, why does this subject evoke so much emotion among the BB commenters? You would almost think it is about fear. Fear of the (minimum) 85% for the (maximum) 15%.
The story told by populists is not true, you are already dealing with the generation of energy by means of winmills and solar panels, it is a dead end but no one dares to pull the plug when this should have been done a long time ago.
Subscriber
gerard 29 January 2023
food security will become a great asset
Ruud Hendriks 29 January 2023
My goodness, what a storm of indignation. "Common whining" and related terms. I wonder what this reads into. "The Dutch soil has been overburdened for the last sixty years and in the future we also want to be able to grow sufficient and resilient crops in the Netherlands" is the only thing I read that could be interpreted in this way.
Organic is on the roll to grow to 15%. That is 85% non-organic. What is everyone so concerned about? Let those who like it do so and do your own thing. Then we will see for ourselves what the future will be.
I see it positively for development, as the next phase in the process of change. Ignore first, then ridicule, then fight, and finally if you can't beat them join them.
Subscriber
rana 29 January 2023
ruud hendriks wrote:
My goodness, what a storm of indignation. "Common whining" and related terms. I wonder what this reads into. "The Dutch soil has been overburdened for the last sixty years and in the future we also want to be able to grow sufficient and resilient crops in the Netherlands" is the only thing I read that could be interpreted in this way.
Organic is on the roll to grow to 15%. That is 85% non-organic. What is everyone so concerned about? Let those who like it do so and do your own thing. Then we will see for ourselves what the future will be.
I see it positively for development, as the next phase in the process of change. Ignore first, then ridicule, then fight, and finally if you can't beat them join them.
Join them? You mean Africa with hunger?
Subscriber
Jurriaan 29 January 2023
Cultivation is a fact that Dutch consumers are not at all interested in organic, is two Ruud Hendriks. So here coercion is being carried out to change, while the market is not asking for it. That is the problem and there is no solution for it. Here in the Netherlands, the small green part calls for things to change, but the normal Dutch person really doesn't care at all and continues to consume, drive and fly lavishly, driven by the government. So why do we have to change under duress, while the Netherlands itself does not?????
Subscriber
CM 29 January 2023
Everything organic, but also the whole world and then the yawn hunger. Sri Lanka is your example that it doesn't work. People here in the western world get completely off track. But if you want widespread poverty and famine, you can get it from me.
Subscriber
not 29 January 2023
Jurriaan will put this in the newspapers and join a leftist talk show please, this will never be in the media.
ruud hendriks what? 29 January 2023
even if you don't know...
the Dutch soil overburdened in the last 60 years??
just a lesson in history the soil is nowhere as good as here in our country.
farmers are the best in the world, all of them top performers who constantly get a load of shit about them, you would only be honored to have deep and deep respect for these top entrepreneurs.

in the Netherlands every citizen thinks they know how the farmer should or could do better.
let everyone take a good look at themselves.
all major problems in this country are made on paper.
manure problem ? has never been there when a crop needs 35/40 tons of fertilizer per ha for optimal growth. But according to the fertilizer legislation, only 18/20 tons per ha is allowed.
and you go 500 kg over the limit of that 18/20 you are a serious criminal
while you properly fertilize and care for the soil.

if you make the norm so tight that it is never attainable and impossible you have a crisis everywhere
nitrogen/energy/fertilizer/etc etc
all those smarties who came up with this still think they can do something, that's the sad thing of all. same story with organic Meneer Hendriks won't work too expensive/people always look for the cheapest, and oh return for grower costs much too high yield poor. see example companies with vertical farming go completely bankrupt t due to high energy / food forests people see nothing of it back to number of years subsidy pot robbed empty and final judgment failed!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the world and people who think they are educated have promoted and established these ideas see result sad today.
let the farmer do his own farming and give him space and more control so that we have top food again for an affordable price for the next 100 years think further for the future, but let the farmer draw his own plan
Subscriber
Krelis 29 January 2023
You read here again a huge gap between our small group (thanks to the postcode lottery filthy rich) green friends with a big mouth, the normal farmers and the extravagant citizen. BBB and Caroline have a big task ahead of them after the election win in March.
Subscriber
ideas 29 January 2023
What a fuss about nothing, let that Hak toil and go grow summer wheat
Subscriber
Zeeuw 29 January 2023
Russians have a price on them, they show that in the Super. Hak is hakbojl day
High pay, high reward 29 January 2023
bio+ wrote:
Well, why does this subject evoke so much emotion among the BB commenters? You would almost think it is about fear. Fear of the (minimum) 85% for the (maximum) 15%.
Because I don't want to go back to the Middle Ages, that I don't want to go back to food, which is organic, total poison for society, I want to be good and correct, and certainly not have to deal with that organic mess, it is total poison, there is nothing worse than that mess.
Subscriber
Bio + 29 January 2023
Well, why does this subject evoke so much emotion among the BB commenters? You would almost think it is about fear. Fear of the (minimum) 85% for the (maximum) 15%.
Subscriber
bio 29 January 2023
The entire organic sector is being pampered and pampered. Just part of agenda 2030, food poverty and dependent on state subsidies.
Now in addition to purchase subsidies, interest discounts maximum cap subsidies to push.
Many regular farmers prefer to keep their own pants and want to produce responsible food for everyone.
Subscriber
Zeeuw 29 January 2023
85% of BIO is good but 85% of 85% conventional is better and affordable and no food banks needed
Flevo farmer 30 January 2023
I think there are quite a few frustrations among some farmers... man man man.
Subscriber
crow 30 January 2023
I don't think those frustrations are necessary, I wish Hak good luck with this strategy, hopefully they will pay the organic farmers a good price. and for the conventional arable farmer, countless resources will disappear in the coming years, so that will also be difficult.
Rich Russian 30 January 2023
What strikes me most about this kind of news is the chest-thumping about the current position of Dutch agriculture. We can certainly be proud of this.

However, if someone comes up with a progressive and ambitious plan to change and develop agriculture (organic or not) they will be declared crazy.

I think we owe the current position of agriculture to ambition, progress and change. And certainly don't dig your heels in, and keep doing what we've always done.
Subscriber
quite coarse 30 January 2023
Times are changing and we as a sector will have to keep up with it.
This is only possible if the consumer indicates that demand and any forcing by anyone or anything will sooner or later fail.
We are already seeing that the German consumer is also giving up because of the price and/or purchasing power.
Time will tell.
Subscriber
Henk 30 January 2023
No frustrations here. It's just a pity that someone from above expresses ambitions, while we as farmers in organic cultivation have much greater cultivation risks. I don't see HAK going to compensate for these risks, they never have. So in the end the financial risk lies with the farmer if you want to participate in this and not with HAK. That's where the shoe pinches.
Subscriber
Hub Rich 30 January 2023
Henk, "So in the end the financial risk also lies with the farmer if you want to participate in this." Everyone takes a risk when making a choice. The farmer, but also the buyer. The point is that you always take a risk, even if you don't make a certain choice.
Subscriber
frog 30 January 2023
There are certainly frustrations here, namely about dismissing regular agriculture as criminal environmental polluters who apparently exhaust their soil to such an extent that nothing will grow at all in ten years' time. I can speak from experience that these lies are not true and that regular agriculture also takes good care of their land.
Subscriber
Zeeuw 30 January 2023
That's how it is frog. Just let them croak. I am proud of conventional agriculture. I wouldn't grow red beetroot for the Russians, so HAK, first the guns to the stable and then you can come and talk. Smart action by HAK, sold 2 times supposedly to millimeter the Russian line, but it is still there. Canned food for the front!!!! Paid with Gas and Oil rubles!!!!
Hub Rich 30 January 2023
Dear Frog. Almost everyone in agriculture will think that citizens should speak nuanced about them. The logical conclusion would then be that it would also be the other way around. But when it comes to politicians, civil servants, media people, etc., the swear words fall short. All idiots and assholes.
About bio it is commented: "it is total poison, there is no worse than that rubbish." Does that evoke frustration in me? Well, just amazement. "
You also say: "There are certainly frustrations here, namely about dismissing regular agriculture as criminal environmental polluters." I don't think there is any profession that takes criticism so personally. Farmers identify themselves with their profession. Is that a logical choice? Farmers are much more loved than they think. Would a program "Politician (civil servant, journalist, trader) seeks wife" last 15 years? Probably not. Yes, there is criticism of agricultural production methods. But what consumers don't do is stop eating in protest. There are shifts, however. From conventional to organic or back. From animal production to plant-based or back.
Subscriber
frog 30 January 2023
Huib Rijk wrote:
Dear Frog. Almost everyone in agriculture will think that citizens should speak nuanced about them. The logical conclusion would then be that it would also be the other way around. But when it comes to politicians, civil servants, media people, etc., the swear words fall short. All idiots and assholes.
About bio it is commented: "it is total poison, there is no worse than that rubbish." Does that evoke frustration in me? Well, just amazement. "
You also say: "There are certainly frustrations here, namely about dismissing regular agriculture as criminal environmental polluters." I don't think there is any profession that takes criticism so personally. Farmers identify themselves with their profession. Is that a logical choice? Farmers are much more loved than they think. Would a program "Politician (civil servant, journalist, trader) seeks wife" last 15 years? Probably not. Yes, there is criticism of agricultural production methods. But what consumers don't do is stop eating in protest. There are shifts, however. From conventional to organic or back. From animal production to plant-based or back.
dear huib, I don't think I'm swearing and I didn't report that bio is poison, so I don't think your comments are appropriate for me.
Hub Rich 30 January 2023
Frog: "dear huib, I don't think I'm swearing and I didn't report that bio is poison, so I don't think your comments are appropriate for me." I understand. Still, I want to go a little deeper into it. You talked about "reporting mainstream agriculture as criminal environmental polluters." I don't see that anywhere in the words of the HAK CEO. What I often see happening is this: for example, there is criticism that soy comes from South America. Response is then: Ok, so we are environmental criminals?!? While another reaction is also possible. In my opinion, there is quite a lot wrong with the world food system. That the phosphate supply will become very tight in about 100 years. That of the total weight of vertebrates is something like 10% wild animals, 30% humans and 60% cattle. That something like 70% of the grain is animal feed. That arable products are often destined for export, while the question is not whether we should feed the world. I think it is much better that we grow more extensively and that fertilizer use in poor countries goes up. (strange thought from an organic farmer?) The tragedy, in my opinion, is that the world food system that we as humanity have developed has a lot of people involved, but that no one is actually to blame. Even as an organic farmer, I feel part of that system. We are all intertwined.

Subscriber
peter 31 January 2023
The enterprising farmer will continue to exist, he has always existed by producing what the market demands, he / she has always done that and that is how they stayed alive. The Bio share will also develop in the market in the same way.
Subscriber
frog 31 January 2023
Huib Rijk wrote:
Frog: "dear huib, I don't think I'm swearing and I didn't report that bio is poison, so I don't think your comments are appropriate for me." I understand. Still, I want to go a little deeper into it. You talked about "reporting mainstream agriculture as criminal environmental polluters." I don't see that anywhere in the words of the HAK CEO. What I often see happening is this: for example, there is criticism that soy comes from South America. Response is then: Ok, so we are environmental criminals?!? While another reaction is also possible. In my opinion, there is quite a lot wrong with the world food system. That the phosphate supply will become very tight in about 100 years. That of the total weight of vertebrates is something like 10% wild animals, 30% humans and 60% cattle. That something like 70% of the grain is animal feed. That arable products are often destined for export, while the question is not whether we should feed the world. I think it is much better that we grow more extensively and that fertilizer use in poor countries goes up. (strange thought from an organic farmer?) The tragedy, in my opinion, is that the world food system that we as humanity have developed has a lot of people involved, but that no one is actually to blame. Even as an organic farmer, I feel part of that system. We are all intertwined.

I can live with this reaction, although I do not agree that it is written that the Dutch soil is overloaded as the CEO writes, and certainly not that organic is the solution. I know from experience that on organic plots the structure is sometimes very poor.
Subscriber
frog 31 January 2023
And furthermore, dear Huib, I may be a little frustrated ha ha ha what is called frustrated but I also get a smile on my face at the thought that this spring I will again see dozens of Eastern European (slave) workers in yellow raincoats plodding through the organic pea fields to remove the black nightshade, good luck with your new customer and ps put on such a raincoat yourself and help those heroes of your fields (wretch).
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. 31 January 2023
Frog, also a bit of a crook.
Subscriber
frog 31 January 2023
Arie poor branch. wrote:
Frog, also a bit of a crook.
Arie you don't want to know how much fun and relaxation I get from this forum.
Subscriber
Hub Rich 31 January 2023
Many thanks, Frog for both responses. Because suppose I wanted confirmation of my statement that many farmers do not want to be judged unilaterally, but do so themselves and that frustration is an important reason for this. Then your contributions are perfect. You assume without further ado that the work with us is inferior - slave labor - and that I will not want to do it myself. We mainly employ Dutch people. For example, during corona, people from the hospitality industry, set construction, then students from all kinds of studies, people who don't want an office job, but work that has a purpose. Almost an exception is the reaction (to my surprise): what a nice job you have. What we do: weeding with the hoe or with a weed bed (lying down), picking weeds with bags, harvesting cabbage, preparing cabbage in the shed. what makes it nice is that most of the farming work is therapeutic. you are busy without having to think much. Plenty of time for fun conversations. Standard measure is that before the harvest of all crops I want the important weeds - nightshade, red leg, meldes, cocksfoot - removed from the plot with the bag. That is so important to me that I want to be there myself. Dealing with people from outside agriculture is perfect. Good against cynicism.
Subscriber
Arie poor branch. 31 January 2023
Frog, what do you think of me.
Subscriber
frog 31 January 2023
Huib Rijk wrote:
Many thanks, Frog for both responses. Because suppose I wanted confirmation of my statement that many farmers do not want to be judged unilaterally, but do so themselves and that frustration is an important reason for this. Then your contributions are perfect. You assume without further ado that the work with us is inferior - slave labor - and that I will not want to do it myself. We mainly employ Dutch people. For example, during corona, people from the hospitality industry, set construction, then students from all kinds of studies, people who don't want an office job, but work that has a purpose. Almost an exception is the reaction (to my surprise): what a nice job you have. What we do: weeding with the hoe or with a weed bed (lying down), picking weeds with bags, harvesting cabbage, preparing cabbage in the shed. what makes it nice is that most of the farming work is therapeutic. you are busy without having to think much. Plenty of time for fun conversations. Standard measure is that before the harvest of all crops I want the important weeds - nightshade, red leg, meldes, cocksfoot - removed from the plot with the bag. That is so important to me that I want to be there myself. Dealing with people from outside agriculture is perfect. Good against cynicism.
Keep it up you are top notch
Subscriber
CM 31 January 2023
When I read those messages from Huib, I am more and more sure that I will not start. Is more on the line of frog.
Subscriber
Editorial office Boerenbusiness 31 January 2023
The editors of Boerenbusiness is strongly in favor of a good substantive discussion on specific topics. This does not include expressing condescension about the opinion or vision of others. That is not included in the forum terms and conditions, but it is tempting to include it. In fact, that will happen. Please enter into a respectful debate here, focusing on the content, not the person. Thank you.
Hypark 31 January 2023
Everyone should do what they enjoy and are satisfied with, that is clear. But if inflation and the world population continue to rise, we currently have enough acreage for organic farming. The market will do its job and not the government. After all, everything revolves around the flute and the penny.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up