The European Commission has today (5 July) adopted a package for the sustainable use of key natural resources. The complete package of measures published today should also boost resilience and agriculture in the EU and fall under the banner of the Green Deal. For agriculture, the opening for the use of new breeding techniques and a law on soil monitoring are particularly relevant.
Farmers and livestock keepers must have access to advanced innovation. This advanced innovation is understood to mean: the new genomic techniques. Although the Commission wants to loosen the reins a bit in the hitherto very strict GMO policy, we in the EU are not given the same space as, for example, in the US or Brazil. The EU distinguishes between two categories, namely GMO crops that are comparable to naturally occurring or conventional crops. Consider, for example, CRISPR-Cas, which accelerates the process of traditional breeding. The second category is GMO crops with more complex modifications. Foreign plant genes are used there to achieve a desired characteristic, such as Bt cotton and maize or roundup-ready varieties. The relaxation that the Commission is aiming for mainly concerns new varieties from the first category.
According to the Commission, it is important that legislation keeps pace with scientific developments. Some regulations were drawn up more than fifty years ago and updating and simplifying the current regulations is therefore not a superfluous luxury, according to the Commission. According to the Commission, Europe is the largest exporter in the global seed market with a market share of 20% and an estimated value of €7 to €10 billion.
Unhealthy soil costs €50 billion
Another important piece presented today is the Soil Monitoring Act, which sets the EU on a pathway to healthy soils by 2050. The Commission aims to achieve this by collecting soil health data and making it available to farmers and other soil managers . Sustainable soil management must become the norm according to the Commission. It is striking that the Commission writes that '60% to 70% of soils in the EU are currently unhealthy'. In addition, 1 billion tons of soil is washed away every year by erosion, causing the fertile cultivation layer to quickly disappear. The costs of soil degradation are estimated at more than €50 billion per year, according to the Commission.
The new soil legislation favored by the Commission provides a 'harmonised definition of soil health, provides a comprehensive and coherent monitoring framework and promotes sustainable soil management and remediation of contaminated sites'. To this end, the EU wants to bring together soil data from different sources, such as soil sampling data from the EU Land Use and Coverage Area frame Survey (LUCAS) combined with satellite data from Copernicus and national and private data.
© DCA Market Intelligence. This market information is subject to copyright. It is not permitted to reproduce, distribute, disseminate or make the content available to third parties for compensation, in any form, without the express written permission of DCA Market Intelligence.
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10904965/70-percent-of-the-soils-in-the-eu-is-unhealthy]'70 percent of the soils in the EU are unhealthy'[/url]
Completely correct, all ill-considered statements/cries. Take the statements made by Frans Timmermans yesterday in a press conference. Really shameful of that stupid bastard. He claimed that the death of a 51-year-old woman from Haarlem by storm Poly is the cause of climate change. Meteorologists (Weather Plaza) speak of great nonsense. to fetch.
It would be appropriate for him to apologize. Would he think he is God?
Next year 4 % in the set-aside scheme........
You can't buy anything in the supermarket with a bag full of money if there's nothing there.....
Let the gnome plop sit comfortably, great ambassador for agriculture! Will be fine by itself. The prices of sugar, potatoes, milk etc are not high enough yet!
Miss Netjes wrote:that in the future combined with a phytophthora/downy mildew year icm. the current resource package.. and it's going to be a big partyNext year 4 % in the set-aside scheme........
You can't buy anything in the supermarket with a bag full of money if there's nothing there.....
Let the gnome plop sit comfortably, great ambassador for agriculture! Will be fine by itself. The prices of sugar, potatoes, milk etc are not high enough yet!
Limburger wrote:In the ideal world of Frans Rob and Sigrid, these diseases apparently do not occur and then you automatically do not get any problems, and then suddenly we woke up in a beautiful green world without food.Miss Netjes wrote:that in the future combined with a phytophthora/downy mildew year icm. the current resource package.. and it's going to be a big partyNext year 4 % in the set-aside scheme........
You can't buy anything in the supermarket with a bag full of money if there's nothing there.....
Let the gnome plop sit comfortably, great ambassador for agriculture! Will be fine by itself. The prices of sugar, potatoes, milk etc are not high enough yet!
frog wrote:You forgot the CU. They're almost as bad. Dark green.Limburger wrote:In the ideal world of Frans Rob and Sigrid, these diseases apparently do not occur and then you automatically do not get any problems, and then suddenly we woke up in a beautiful green world without food.Miss Netjes wrote:that in the future combined with a phytophthora/downy mildew year icm. the current resource package.. and it's going to be a big partyNext year 4 % in the set-aside scheme........
You can't buy anything in the supermarket with a bag full of money if there's nothing there.....
Let the gnome plop sit comfortably, great ambassador for agriculture! Will be fine by itself. The prices of sugar, potatoes, milk etc are not high enough yet!
Emaciated natura2000 areas are really unhealthy. Thousands of years ago, these were often nitrogen-rich forest areas. Through sheep farming, they were used as a source of nitrogen for the scarce arable land (collecting manure in sheepfolds, and sod cutting every 15 years). 3 to 5 ha of heathland was needed to fertilize 1 ha of arable land and as a result these heathland areas became poorer and poorer, even drifting sand. Today, these emaciated heathlands have been promoted to ecologically valuable Natura 2000 areas. Nitrogen is needed to make these areas fertile again. Let livestock farming be able to help with that. But the truth no longer matters today. Politicians, together with the many "experts", have determined that these emaciated areas must remain emaciated. No one knows why, but that's just how it was decided. The unhealthy soils are therefore not the fertile farmer's lands, but the natura2000 areas managed by the government itself.