European Union

News Politics

Green light for controversial Nature Restoration Act

12 July 2023 - Linda van Eekeres - 2 comments

The Nature Restoration Act has not been swept off the table in the European Parliament today, although it was exciting. European Commissioner Frans Timmermans can breathe a sigh of relief, but critics think that the law can have major effects in a densely populated country like the Netherlands. 

The European Parliament today voted by roll call on the bill. This came after the European Parliament's Agriculture Committee rejected the law and the vote of the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety ended in a stalemate. 336 of the MEPs voted in favor of the bill and 300 against. The relevant ministers of the EU member states voted in favor before, after the law had been weakened. The Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Poland, and Italy resisted. The European Parliament also weakened the law slightly.

Postponement in case of socio-economic consequences
MEPs support the European Commission's proposal to introduce recovery measures for at least 2030% of all land and sea areas in the EU by 20, but want food security to be guaranteed in the long term and that targets can be postponed on the basis of exceptional socio-economic consequences. The objectives must also not stand in the way of new infrastructures for renewable energy and the Member States must first designate the areas where nature must be restored.

Member of Parliament Bert-Jan Ruissen (SGP), a fierce opponent from the very beginning, calls it 'a good thing' that the European Parliament has watered down the proposal somewhat. "This gives countries some freedom to choose which needs should take priority." Still, he "would have preferred the proposal to have been further rejected or further watered down." "The EU rules for nature restoration are still too rigid, too one-sided and too far-reaching. Many (rural) areas will be locked, at the expense of food production, housing construction and even road safety!"

The next step is for the European Parliament and the Council to reach an agreement.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
2 comments
Subscriber
Zeeuw 12 July 2023
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10905052/green-light-for-disputed-nature-restoration-law]Green-light for controversial Nature-restoration-law[/url]
So, that means that the sector must remain sharp on honest information. Make sure you participate in the assessment of nature. Work on amending the law that vague descriptions are being misused by lawyers: caution principle by the Council of State for N deposition and prospect of legalization by many municipalities in zoning ordinances
ouch gurkey 13 July 2023
Which socio-economic consequences outweigh the restoration of nature for future generations for a steward? A lack of food security??
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register