Shutterstock

Background Nitrogen mood

Collective and mutual trauma after Rutte IV

14 July 2023 - Klaas van der Horst - 25 comments

The week after the fall of the Rutte IV cabinet is special for the Netherlands in every respect. Rarely, if not ever, have so many ministers and politicians announced their departure after the fall of a cabinet as this time. The prime minister plus all deputy prime ministers, as well as three of the four political leaders of the governing parties, have given up, while more politicians may follow. The exodus surpasses that in agriculture, just to name a side street.

Each of them will (partly) have their own reasons, but a superficial observer will in any case conclude that there is something wrong with this. And to say that the hardened climate is to blame is too easy. Hardening is not good, but also those who complain about this often have butter on their heads, if not with words, then with behavior. What can now be seen looks like a collective trauma, which many parties in society (and not just the farmers) also feel. This is evidenced by the enormous number of complaints about government policy.

Recovery becomes a big issue
The search for recovery promises to be a major issue in the new election campaign, which will kick off after the summer, with many new faces trying to sell their plans and good intentions to voters. This campaign may create new opportunities for parties not affected by government policy.

It had to go wrong at LNV
The major pain point in agriculture is and remains the nitrogen policy and everything related to it. Former top civil servant Tjibbe Joustra analyzed this week a TV interview accurately what has gone wrong in terms of policy on the part of the government. A Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality in which two ministers hold each other in a headlock, that was bound to go wrong. The approach with a minister for every problem has also not helped. Joustra wisely did not comment on the content.

At first glance, after the talks on an agricultural agreement had been broken, Piet Adema finally seemed to have his hands free to put something concrete down. But then came the fall of the cabinet and he was again unable to create anything tangible. Christianne van der Wal was the same way. It had to guarantee that the agreed nitrogen policy would continue, but that effort was also blocked.

How far did the exchange go?
Although most in agriculture did not agree with where Adema wanted to go, many farmers had the impression that he, more than his predecessor, wanted to help them as much as possible. The question remains whether he had that space. Evil tongues claim that the ChristenUnie may have already exchanged the nitrogen file in advance with the formation. Who all knew about that is point two. More things were exchanged in the coalition agreement, but the implementation of those agreements was difficult.

It is now a matter of waiting for a decision from the House of Representatives, which files may still be handled and which will be declared controversial. It is expected to be voted on in September. Organizations such as Greenpeace are putting pressure – because of the urgency – to continue with the nitrogen policy, but this seems difficult. It's too controversial. Still, it is not entirely without chance, because outgoing Prime Minister Rutte also stated that he is still looking for opportunities.

Solution-oriented policy
Whether there will be a completely different policy after the elections in November remains to be seen. Much depends on which coalitions can be forged, and on whether parties are prepared to look at the existing problems with a fresh, solution-oriented view. It is almost inconceivable that the policy that has now been introduced will continue unabated, but it will probably not be possible to abandon the table completely.

In the meantime, the provinces have also been made tasty with the tens of billions that Minister Van der Wal waved. Its budget of €45 billion for the countryside has already been oversubscribed several times with wish lists from the various provinces. However, a new government will also have to make cutbacks, given the sharply changed economic situation.

Apocalyptic sounds
On the other hand, there will be pressure from Brussels to continue on the path taken under Rutte IV. Moreover, European Commissioner Frans Timmermans wants to go much further. He also wants to greatly improve the health of Europe's soils and go full steam ahead with his nature restoration plans. To get things moving, Timmermans and his ally Virginius Sinkevicius sometimes paint the current situation. in almost apocalyptic terms off. For example, between 60% and 70% of all soils in Europe are said to be unhealthy and 83% of soils are polluted with residues from plant protection products. They say this is scientifically proven.

Add a grain of salt
Inquiry shows that it should be taken with a grain of salt. The 60% to 70% unhealthy soils comes from an anthology of the Mission Board for Soil Health and Food, which may advise the European Commission and is chaired by former minister Cees Veerman. The 83% contamination with pesticide residue is a rough simplification and refers to the estimated presence of one or more types of residue (not quantified) in soils. This report also quotes the wild claim that less than 0,1% of plant protection products reach their target. This comes from a French study from 1986. That level.

Policy Science
Fortunately, the quality of science in the Netherlands is better, although nitrogen professor and cabinet adviser Jan Willem Erisman still has to explain why nitrogen emissions on Schiermonnikoog are increasing while the cows are gone. He had envisioned it very differently. It could just be that with a new cabinet, the policy-scientific insights under the entire nitrogen policy will be revised.

Less demand for sustainable
Many farmers mainly see a breathing space in the fall of the cabinet. The opponents of agriculture will remain, but the pressure from policy will decrease. At Lely Industries they are less happy with it, although there the hope was mainly for certainty about policy for the longer term. At Lely they had hoped to be able to sell quite a few Spheres, but the sales targets have now been adjusted downwards. Rabobank will probably also issue less sustainable loans. Farmers are waiting, also paralyzed.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

Klaas van der Horst is a passionate follower of the dairy market and everything related to it. He searches for the news and interprets the developments.
Comments
25 comments
Subscriber
sefO 14 July 2023
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikel/10905098/collective-and-wederzijds-trauma-after-rutte-iv]Collective and mutual trauma after Rutte IV[/url]
That committee chaired by that Dutch quack (Veerman) is also still in the market to provide that owlet Timmermans with impossible studies and framed figures, it is one big scumbag what is being done to the farmers.
Subscriber
CM 14 July 2023
Please say let's stop taking that Veerman seriously. Pocket filler first class but beating others with sanctimonious Christian face.
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 14 July 2023
Well, when the soil is considered something inert and also a direct object, I think you have to go back to school to learn something about a living soil. EVERY farmer, without one exception, knows that when there are problems in the soil, the harvests will be disappointing, but it may be that not all farmers know how to get and keep a soil alive and healthy. Of course ALL farmers want to have a healthy soil because that is the greatest capital they have.
Of course, NO farmer wants to see a climate deterioration. From these thoughts you can build a lot of bridges as long as the information is THE RIGHT, and I question THAT.
The plastic problem in the seas and oceans could well be the main reason for the temperature increase that is taking place there, with all its consequences, which many now believe are caused by nitrogen and carbon dioxide and methane. Would say everyone into the think tank and literally cry out and start again!
Subscriber
sea ​​breeze 16 July 2023
It is wise that those responsible for malpractice have left. Only Tjeerd the Lie3n Peerd is still at his post? Beforehand, I think, there was a deal: Rutte may become prime minister, Van derWal ensures N policy implementation of Tjeerd D66 and LNV becomes responsible for m@lversating communication with the sectors, without money for policy. So pre-drama screenplay and focused , still on land grab. For nature, voir houses, for flying hours Schiphol! What a lot of bullshit from crazy smart people. Questions to Brussels for tightening up policy, withdrawing derogation, not reading letters properly, incorrectly manipulated reports on water quality to the EU, etc. etc. ……Sector must now conduct its own policy, draw up a tough line, inform citizens about the approach to the set goals, ask help from BBB and others including CBL and demand that imported food is produced to the same standard and otherwise does not reach the supermarket shelves or the citizens can take it out for free. I assure you that citizens are happy to do so when name and location and date are mentioned. “do you remember…” where is the party “sure that it works en masse!
Subscriber
Concerned citizen 17 July 2023
Please note: this cabinet may have resigned, but bills are being pushed through in haste that have nothing to do with the current situation in the Netherlands. There are a whole lot of internet consultations that will simply be pushed through in the coming months if the cabinet continues to rule 'outgoing'. These bills harm the freedom of citizens and farmers and must not pass!

See https://www.internetconsultatie.nl
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 17 July 2023
Yesterday 16/07, I spoke for almost 4 hours about what is currently happening here in Brazil in the field of sustainable arable and pasture farming on an area of ​​more than 3,5 million hectares because this is also sometimes interesting can be for the Netherlands and Europe. In addition to working as green as possible, all companies involved participate in "NKG-No till" and use basalt powder, resulting in drastic cost savings per hectare and also better production and a great difference in rooting without a deserved more price is for the production of these companies. The transition period from conventional to sustainable is 3-5 years. Studies on this topic have been done in China and in the US "Cornbelt". Wouldn't this be much better and achievable goals than the ones we now have in the Netherlands and Europe?
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 17 July 2023
Spoke to a member of the transition team of the current government who looked at sustainable agriculture.
Subscriber
Southwest 17 July 2023
Louis Pascal de Geer wrote:
Spoke to a member of the transition team of the current government who looked at sustainable agriculture.
Stop talking that madness into those officials. Nkg does not work here, much too changeable and often too wet surface. No till is something for dry areas, continental climate. no winter here either, so totally unsuitable.
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 17 July 2023
What a pity that you think that's madness, perhaps what I should have said is that the difference between companies that use the basalt powder and those that don't is big here, in China and the US, maybe madness? I do not think so.
It took years for Frankie Dijkstra's "No Till" to be recognized as a great development.
Difficult in the Netherlands, yes, just as being sustainable is difficult.
Subscriber
time bomb 17 July 2023
Louis Pascal de Geer wrote:
What a pity that you think that's madness, perhaps what I should have said is that the difference between companies that use the basalt powder and those that don't is big here, in China and the US, maybe madness? I do not think so.
It took years for Frankie Dijkstra's "No Till" to be recognized as a great development.
Difficult in the Netherlands, yes, just as being sustainable is difficult.
There will be tests here, if not, start immediately.
Subscriber
quite coarse 17 July 2023
Southwest wrote:
Louis Pascal de Geer wrote:
Spoke to a member of the transition team of the current government who looked at sustainable agriculture.
Stop talking that madness into those officials. Nkg does not work here, much too changeable and often too wet surface. No till is something for dry areas, continental climate. no winter here either, so totally unsuitable.
Yet I see subsoilers being used by many colleagues, certainly also in the southwest.
Subscriber
January 17 July 2023
good information/cultivation guidance is needed
Subscriber
time bomb 17 July 2023
pretty rude wrote:
Southwest wrote:
Louis Pascal de Geer wrote:
Spoke to a member of the transition team of the current government who looked at sustainable agriculture.
Stop talking that madness into those officials. Nkg does not work here, much too changeable and often too wet surface. No till is something for dry areas, continental climate. no winter here either, so totally unsuitable.
Yet I see subsoilers being used by many colleagues, certainly also in the southwest.
In this south-west on fairly heavy soil nkg for seed potatoes, and I have to be honest: didn't like it, but they look beautiful.
shoemakers 18 July 2023
Good guidance, you shouldn't be at czav, at least not here between Eindhoven and Tilburg
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 26 July 2023
Back to that madness for a moment, I spoke to a member of the transition team of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio LULA da Silva, who has been watching and reviewing sustainable agriculture here in Brazil. In the meantime I have received a copy of this presentation on this subject that was presented to the Vice-President Geraldo Alckmin in which there are many things that can also be very interesting for countries outside Brazil.
The foundations:
Movement to improve the farmer's conditions...
We defend the right to be free in the choice of means of principle and to have the freedom to obtain them within our regions.
We look for solutions in all forms of "agriculture" without prejudice.
We understand "knowledge" as a source of wealth in which sharing this knowledge is more important than competition.
Results.:
60 - 80% reduction of fertilizers and harmful plant protection products..
30% less production costs..
Number of united members practicing sustainable agriculture = 3.800
Number of hectares involved in the process = 3.500.000
All NKG-No Till
Despite the fact that production is better and healthier, there is still no separate price structure, but the cost reduction alone proves to be enormously worthwhile.
Good to think about!


Subscriber
Southwest 26 July 2023
Better a good neighbor than a distant friend I would say.
loom 26 July 2023
pacal de geer gets very annoying.
we don't have to consider anything at all.
we have to move to a wider fertilization room standard because it is simply way too tight, we must be able to apply much more extensive animal manure (solid) and not have to squeeze every kg to exceed the standard.

there are already far too few resources, put it out of your mind that we can do this mechanically because that won't work with, for example, wet years, it is pulling a dead horse, a lot of work, zero result. we don't have to talk about hand weeding too expensive / can't get anyone everyone feels their own too good. conclusion back to eg normal use of coated seed beet/bean/onion etc etc and agents that work in the crop and field for pest/disease.
all the bans have only gotten worse, see eg potato germ treatment best and shortest blow is just chlorine ipc also cheapest!
it becomes / is a world where everything becomes green sounds nice works totally wrong .... let a farmer farm 9 out of ten cases he knows best himself.
every time whining about nkg till etc
plowing is still the best choice in most cases new beginnings/nice clean seedbed especially for fine crops you cannot do without it and certainly not on sandy soil. they used to be crazy!! not trying to reinvent the wheel
Subscriber
onion 26 July 2023
Agreed.
Subscriber
CM 26 July 2023
Exactly right, that's how it is and not otherwise.
Subscriber
Drent 26 July 2023
exactly
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 27 July 2023
Dear Grower, Thank you for your response to which I will comment as follows.
1. It is absolutely NOT my intention to be annoying
2. NKG-Notill here was "invented" by a Dutch farmer Frankie Dijkstra who received a high Brazilian award for it.
3. In 2017 there were 550.000 companies here in Brazil practicing this method and that number will be much higher today;
4. Agricultural machines, especially the sowing machines, have been adapted over the years to the demand to be able to sow well in heavy stubble.
5. In this system, the soil is worked by the soil life, which you can call a kind of biological tillage.
6. There is better drainage. we can enter the field sooner after heavy rains without causing compaction and we can also sow/plant longer because moisture is retained in the soil for longer.
7. Losses from water and wind erosion have largely come to a halt and THESE losses have been the main reasons why Dijkstra started NKG-NoTill.
8. The soil temperature during sowing can rise to 55º C with traditional tillage, while in a covered soil it can be as much as 20º degrees lower!
9. Better and deeper rooting of the crops
10. With this system it is possible to have a rotation of 2 crops per year of soybeans-maize; In some parts of Brazil, even 3 crops are possible.
11. I think that in the Netherlands the advantages could be to make better use of the growing season and to be able to carry out winter crops better. More grazing days, more sowing days and more harvest days seem attractive to me.
12. Here science has embraced NKG-NoTill after years, but unfortunately they often follow farmers instead of showing farmers the way. Too bad, but where with us and in the Netherlands????

Subscriber
Huge beef 27 July 2023
let a farmer farm 9 out of ten cases he knows best himself.
every time whining about nkg till etc
.....they weren't crazy back in the day!! not trying to reinvent the wheel.
Dear grower, I think you are stuck in an era several decades ago. I'm not saying you're wrong, but unfortunately the past is gone for good. It is therefore not going to happen that all measures are reversed. Of the 3 possibilities - A everything will be like in the good old days, B everyone has to adapt to the new times or C otherwise unfortunately have to leave - only options B and C are still present.
Subscriber
in hiding 27 July 2023
Let every grower keep looking around.
Then he himself sees the results of various forms of editing.
And then he's free to do whatever he wants.
Every year and every crop reacts to the circumstances of the moment.
But don't try to force anything on anyone.
Subscriber
CM 27 July 2023
Brazil and the Netherlands are not comparable in terms of soil type, climate and crops. No Till is not going to take off here: yields are falling and quality problems with grubbing rights. This is a prim system due to erosion, small cultivation layer and cost aspect, but here we have different soil and climate conditions. Nkg is something else, some use it, but it doesn't really take off if you grow a lot of fine seed crops.
Subscriber
CM 27 July 2023
must be grubbing fruits instead of grubbing rights.
You can no longer respond.

Sign up for our newsletter

Sign up and receive the latest news in your inbox every day

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Analysis milk

Validating emission quota per company is a big job

Background Business

Fertilization in NV areas increasingly under pressure

Call our customer service +0320 - 269 528

or mail to supportboerenbusiness. Nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register