Europese Commissie

Background Nitrogen mood

Cabinet fallen, but policy must continue

8 September 2023 - Klaas van der Horst - 9 comments

The cabinet has fallen, but the government coalition actually wants to continue with the policy it has started as much as possible. This became clear this week during the debates and votes in the House of Representatives on the question of which topics should be declared controversial and which should not.

Traditionally, after the fall of a cabinet, the parliament takes extra account of the opposition parties and does not try to push through the broken coalition. After all, the collaboration has failed. This time there was not a great deal of favoritism, even though an exceptional number of members of the old partnership decided to give up politically. It smacks of bitter frustration.

Gift for opposition
The opposition can do little other than show surprise and dissatisfaction about this attitude, but it also knows that the attitude of the old House can help it in the election campaign. It is an appreciated gift, especially for the BBB and NSC. Continuing to push forward in the manner of recent years is precisely what has made Caroline van der Plas and Pieter Omtzigt so popular.  

Still, picket posts fell
However, the fall of the cabinet and its aftermath have caused some stakes to fall. For example, even Member of Parliament Tjeerd de Groot now acknowledges that the year 2030 is no longer feasible as an end point for the nitrogen reduction plan. Nitrogen Minister Christianne van der Wal also seems to understand that her Nitrogen Act will no longer pass the House of Representatives now that her own VVD faction no longer believes in it. She had other thoughts for a long time. Her outgoing colleague Piet Adema had more quickly drawn the conclusion that now is no longer the time for grand plans.

Freed from external pressure for a while (because there are no more talks about an Agricultural Agreement), seven farmers' organizations from the dairy farming industry have put their heads together and a vision of the future drawn up. It is the undirected fruit of all consultations. In the piece they indicate how they want to achieve a change towards climate neutrality together without ultimata from politicians, but with some political support.

Target regulations
The dairy farming organizations, like many large companies, want to achieve climate neutrality by 2050. On the basis of goal and not means regulations. They actually want to get rid of a few existing pesticide regulations, such as the ban on meeting the full nutrient needs of their crops with animal manure, instead of with a mix of artificial fertilizer and manure. This and the plan to be allowed to use processed manure as a fertilizer substitute still require some European hurdles to be overcome. However, not everything has been thoroughly explained. A number of organizations report that their members do not yet know anything about it.

Hoekstra light for climate pope
Perhaps with Wopke Hoekstra as the new European climate pope, more is possible in the field of manure and the environment than was possible with his predecessor Frans Timmermans. It is also quite possible that the Brussels mills will run little differently. Despite all the technological progress, official-political circuits have not become faster or better, but rather slower and more difficult. Hoekstra has not yet been confirmed as the new European Commissioner. First it must be accepted by the European Parliament. There, the left wing is already critical in advance, because they have not yet been able to catch him with much climate feeling, while a coalition of large green NGOs is also not keen on Hoekstra's arrival, because he 'has too little experience' in the field of climate. CDA green is not green enough.

Van der Wal irritates peak loaders
In the meantime, the Minister for Nature and Nitrogen continues to report growing interest in the purchase scheme for peak loaders. More and more companies are inquiring about the possibilities - already more than five hundred. To be fair, Minister Van der Wal notes that informing does not equate to signing. The example of the Grin family in Biddinghuizen will not immediately make other interested farmers more eager to sell their company to Van der Wal. The minister, who is also a candidate MP for the VVD, is unable to reach out to the said family, and perhaps others as well. to strike the right tone. It often has to start with that.

Van der Wal does not target all peak loaders. The farms on the Veluwe, but not a shortcut in the same area. Schiphol of course not either. that is a peak burden, but the national airport falls under a different regime, with rules that do not apply to ordinary farms. Not all peak loaders are equal for the government, but that was already known.

The VVD has now decided to include Van der Wal, despite her reputation in the countryside, among the first five candidates on the list for the House of Representatives elections at the end of November. In any case, she is appreciated internally.

De Groot waits
Whether D66 Member of Parliament Tjeerd de Groot will also get a place on his party's list will only become clear in a few days. This politician, who is not very appreciated in agriculture, seems to want to continue. In any case, he is not one of the large crowd of veterans who have indicated that they will leave. De Groot leaves it to the judgment of the D66 nomination committee. In the meantime, he shows no signs of fatigue or despondency. He continues to fight for fewer cows and livestock farms. The time he drove around at the NZO with dairy advertising on his car seems like something from another life.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Klaas van der Horst

He is a dairy market specialist at DCA Market Intelligence. He researches market news and trends and interprets developments.
Comments
9 comments
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 8 September 2023
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/article/10905873/kabinet-cases-but-policy-must-continue]Cabinet fallen, but policy must continue[/url]
Why can't we move towards a completely new policy to protect the climate and agriculture without fear mongering or spreading half-truths?
What can real science tell us about how to move forward without rehashing the old stories?
Who dares to include these things in their program?
I think many people are waiting for this!
Subscriber
Brabant 9 September 2023
Louis Pascal de Geer wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/article/10905873/kabinet-cases-but-policy-must-continue]Cabinet fallen, but policy must continue[/url]
Why can't we move towards a completely new policy to protect the climate and agriculture without fear mongering or spreading half-truths?
What can real science tell us about how to move forward without rehashing the old stories?
Who dares to include these things in their program?
I think many people are waiting for this!
That will be FDF at Van Haga with the next elections
Subscriber
Chief O 9 September 2023
Hoekstra lacks the courage to do something positive for the farmers.
Hoekstra barks sometimes but never bites!!
Subscriber
CM 9 September 2023
Brabander wrote:
Louis Pascal de Geer wrote:
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/article/10905873/kabinet-cases-but-policy-must-continue]Cabinet fallen, but policy must continue[/url]
Why can't we move towards a completely new policy to protect the climate and agriculture without fear mongering or spreading half-truths?
What can real science tell us about how to move forward without rehashing the old stories?
Who dares to include these things in their program?
I think many people are waiting for this!
That will be FDF at Van Haga with the next elections
0 seats.
Subscriber
sea ​​breeze 9 September 2023
The longer they push on, the better the campaign of the opposition parties.
New policy is ready for N policy and climate-neutral agriculture. The sector knows how things are going, so... ensure a solid, non-corruptible group of scientists who can honestly substantiate policy. Fools like the recent group of 4 from the WUR sustainable suits only the models and it says…. Less cattle…. Don't ask C. Hordijk if it is correct, because even if it is incorrect, he and his followers say: it is correct. Check research reports to see what the value is and how reliable and thunder models where an outsider can no longer follow how many buttons can be varied directly in the trash bin. Many researchers do not have the level to appreciate these influences. Even Tjeerd het Leugenpeerd has to wait for his position, I wish him number 100, he can stay put!
rule maker 10 September 2023
Why did the government fall, not because they were doing so well, well, policy must continue, completely destroy that gang, they have already destroyed so much, it cannot be repaired in 50 years, the only thing would be to prosecute this gang criminally, which we as residents are entitled to, and also set an example for those who come, if they commit such bad policies that we will not accept it and that they will be dealt with personally
Subscriber
sea ​​breeze 11 September 2023
Rule creator you are 100% right!
Today I listened again to an interview with emeritus professor Dr Han Lindeboom, look it up on the internet on April 22, with Zwagerman among others! It makes you cringe at how the Netherlands and the farmers are being cheated. I think there are grounds for legal action! Who dares? I will give one example: RIVM has admitted that there is an error in the Aerius calculation model. I know for Zeeland there is an error of factor 1 and that is equal to the entire debit for the Province of Zeeland! That came from Zee, they say, it will be added to the total N tax of Zeeland. Now it has been recognized that that is wrong. And what does LNV and Van der Wal say: we maintain the system, including the errors. RIVM does not dare to take action: who pays, decides! TNO has also shown that measurements below 400 molN/ha/year cannot be traced back to the source. Van der Wal does not wish to correct due to improper management and claims! People, it is time for Van der Wal and Adema to be taken to court and charged with applying insider forgery in regulations. Something for the Council of State to apply the “precautionary principle”
Subscriber
time bomb 11 September 2023
Completely agree with Zeewind, but is this not the job for lto, agractie and fdf together, or do they not dare.
It's 5 to 12.
There is nothing I would rather do, because these people are a weed in our garden, our everything.
Subscriber
sea ​​breeze 12 September 2023
Certainly Tijdbbecause is work for joint organizations. Now they can show whether they employ people with balls. The time of endless bullshit at the table when you are being screwed over is over. The gate on the dam for the controlling pennelickers is closing!
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

Opinions Arjan Ausma

Look ahead without losing vision under grids

Background Economy

Extensive livestock farmers receive considerably more than arable farmers

News milk

Other phosphate excretions not coordinated with Brussels

BBTV Lubbert van Dellen

All about renure, nitrogen and new termination scheme

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Sign up