Photo Martijn Beekman / Ministry of Finance

News Budget Day

Cabinet keeps pace with nitrogen file

19 September 2023 - Linda van Eekeres - 31 comments

The outgoing cabinet is keeping the momentum going on the nitrogen dossier. This was already evident from the fact that the subject had not been declared controversial and it became clear again this afternoon during the Speech from the Throne that King Willem-Alexander delivered on this Budget Day, just like last year in the Royal Theater due to maintenance work on the Binnenhof.

"The government remains committed to progress on the nitrogen dossier, knowing that otherwise the problem will only get worse, with all the consequences for nature, but also for housing construction and road construction," the king said. "It is therefore positive that the provinces have presented the area plans for nitrogen reduction and that several hundred companies that emit a lot of nitrogen near vulnerable nature are considering participating in a buyout scheme."

The recently published research by the UvA and also that it RIVM wants to abandon the Aerius calculation method has therefore not yet led to any other insights. 

Investment in business succession and organic sector
It was previously announced that the government will make €175 million in investments in agriculture from the Transition Fund, including €50 million for the organic sector and €100 million for business succession. King Willem-Alexander said this afternoon: "It has been clear from the outset that the nitrogen and nature policy go hand in hand with perspective and clarity for agriculture. Especially for young farmers who want to build a sustainable future. For them, the cabinet will make next year money will be released for support in business succession. The organic sector will also receive extra support."

Preparing the market for organic
The agricultural budget from the briefcase that Finance Minister Sigrid Kaag presented to the House of Representatives today states that the government will continue 'implementing the national action plan for organic agriculture and consumption' in 2024. "The aim of this plan is to ensure that 2030% of agricultural land is used for the production of organic food by 15. Consumers must contribute to this and the market is being prepared for this."

According to the trade association of the organic sector, Bionext, the promised €50 million should go to consumer campaigns, National Organic Weeks, ambassadors and chain directors in the organic chains, as part of the market program of the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality. The commitment is in line with previous agreements in the collapsed agricultural agreement. "Given the rapidly rising costs and the stagnant market, this news comes not a day too soon," Bionext said in a press statement.

According to the government, the budget for Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality will increase by 68% in the coming years through a gradual increase from approximately €3 billion in 2023 to €5 billion in 2026 and will remain stable thereafter. "This increase is due to increasing expenditure in the context of the agricultural transition and solving the nitrogen crisis." As expected, the outgoing cabinet did not come with any major surprises in the agricultural field.

Do you have a tip, suggestion or comment regarding this article? Let us know

Linda van Eekeres

Linda van Eekeres is co-writing editor-in-chief. She mainly focuses on macro-economic developments and the influence of politics on the agricultural sector.
Comments
31 comments
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 21 September 2023
This is in response to it Boerenbusiness article:
[url = https: // www.boerenbusiness.nl/artikelen/10906005/kabinet-houdt-vaart-in-nitrostofdossier]Cabinet keeps pace with nitrogen dossier[/url]
It is sad for me to see that an outgoing cabinet submits its government plans for the following year to an outgoing House, after which the General Considerations will follow in the House of Representatives.
King Willem-Alexander has the duty to read these plans as a Speech from the Throne on Budget Day, a holiday for our democracy.
In fact, after the elections of November 22 and when the new government takes office, everything that is seen as controversial would immediately be put on hold until the new government comes up with its plans.
I hope that the voters will give the current cabinet and House the full weight.
"Preparing the market for 15% organic by 2030" How arrogant can you be!
I am a great supporter of sustainable, regenerative agriculture, but on a voluntary basis without manipulation or intimidation
loom 21 September 2023
15%.......
now 4 and they can't get rid of their mess.
simply leave the growing of food to the professional top growers
in the usual way, and give them the resources they need.
so that food also remains affordable, this will become the largest point in the world. if you only have green delusions.....
Subscriber
time bomb 21 September 2023
grower wrote:
15%.......
now 4 and they can't get rid of their mess.
simply leave the growing of food to the professional top growers
in the usual way, and give them the resources they need.
so that food also remains affordable, this will become the largest point in the world. if you only have green delusions.....
Completely agree with you. They already include their grown (they try) products with regularly grown products.
Broilers too, I understand. Many consumers are now unable to afford the regularly grown product, let alone the ...% more expensive products. Regularly grown products are subject to strict unannounced controls during production, as are crop protection products and their use.
Subscriber
Drent 21 September 2023
grower wrote:
15%.......
now 4 and they can't get rid of their mess.
simply leave the growing of food to the professional top growers
in the usual way, and give them the resources they need.
so that food also remains affordable, this will become the largest point in the world. if you only have green delusions.....
exactly
Subscriber
sea ​​breeze 21 September 2023
Excellent responses. Organic products grow well. Growing common products and applying safe standards, that really works!,!, that is even better for the climate and the natural impact if there is already one! If you want to consume less conventional food, even better, but stay away from the pricing of that food. Is your name Min by chance? Adema: don't be a follower, but put a vision on the table and ensure that production elsewhere also meets safe standards. Not organic here and cheap import from common elsewhere!!! Hypocrisy at its finest!
Subscriber
Freek 22 September 2023
Conventional arable farming/livestock farming is an 'overkill' of everything: too many small and large livestock and (artificial) manure per hectare, too much concentrate per animal, too many pesticides per hectare, too many hormones, poisons and minerals in ditches, etc., etc. is only increasing, despite so-called innovations.
Taking a step back yields a lot; also lower costs and more profit.
Subscriber
jp 22 September 2023
Frank wrote:
Conventional arable farming/livestock farming is an 'overkill' of everything: too many small and large livestock and (artificial) manure per hectare, too much concentrate per animal, too many pesticides per hectare, too many hormones, poisons and minerals in ditches, etc., etc. is only increasing, despite so-called innovations.
Taking a step back yields a lot; also lower costs and more profit.
Freek, do you ever drink alcohol?
Subscriber
Freek 22 September 2023
I mix soy with the milk: 50/50. AH also comes with a combination of both; to reduce the environmental impact. It is not original (they already do this at KLM regarding kerosene), but it is the trend.
Subscriber
time bomb 22 September 2023
Frank wrote:
Conventional arable farming/livestock farming is an 'overkill' of everything: too many small and large livestock and (artificial) manure per hectare, too much concentrate per animal, too many pesticides per hectare, too many hormones, poisons and minerals in ditches, etc., etc. is only increasing, despite so-called innovations.
Taking a step back yields a lot; also lower costs and more profit.
Lower costs????? More profit??????. What a stupid story. Start knitting goat's wool socks.
Subscriber
marc 22 September 2023
Freek. too many organic onions were sold on the conventional market last season. too much organic early carrot is now weighing on the conventional market. Too many organic farmers enjoy rvo benefits (gold) with a too intensive cultivation plan
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 22 September 2023
Freek tells what many citizens and consumers firmly believe and it is up to us to provide them with a better account of the facts.
Self-criticism is almost always appropriate.
Sustainable regenerative agriculture is not a step back, but a leap forward.
With lower costs, better quality food and constant yields there is more profit!
Common practice in the Netherlands is not "free for all", but already bound by a series of laws, rules and restrictions, many of which defeat their purpose and the irritations of the producers are therefore very understandable
Subscriber
time bomb 22 September 2023
Louis Pascal de Geer wrote:
Freek tells what many citizens and consumers firmly believe and it is up to us to provide them with a better account of the facts.
Self-criticism is almost always appropriate.
Sustainable regenerative agriculture is not a step back, but a leap forward.
With lower costs, better quality food and constant yields there is more profit!
Common practice in the Netherlands is not "free for all", but already bound by a series of laws, rules and restrictions, many of which defeat their purpose and the irritations of the producers are therefore very understandable
How do you get lower costs? Seed, seed potatoes, organic fertilizer are much more expensive, as are labor, quality, and yields that remain the same.
Leave things as they are, and where there are improvements, cherish them. But please let the food package remain affordable for everyone, otherwise there will be surpluses very quickly.
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 22 September 2023
Yes, Time Bomb You hit the nail on the head with cherishing improvements and keeping the food package affordable. Of course, Wageningen should have led the way a long time ago.
Subscriber
juun 22 September 2023
Well, the current policy will eventually lead to the opposite of what they want. phytophthora is already a strain that is aggressive and resistant to a group of agents. just a new strain that is resistant to everything and everyone has half harvests.
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 23 September 2023
For me, organic and sustainable agriculture has a great future after the publication on November 28, 2014 of the results of a study that could prove the communication of plants with and through the internet of micélios formed by fungi fungi. Plants help each other absorb food and sabotage the actions of attackers.
By learning from this, and especially by listening to Nature, you can take measures to make the crops unattractive to, for example, phytophtera
The problem of resistance is a direct consequence of conventional thinking and action.
As far as I know, the most complete research into the role of fungi - fungii is underway at Kew Gardens in London.
Subscriber
CM 23 September 2023
That's all well and good that Bio, but that's where phytophtora breaks out first. So we won't get any further with that, Louis.
Subscriber
Gerben 23 September 2023
We know from forestry that fungi work excellently with trees, especially in a varied tree population. This leads to better growth, a moister environment, less loss, faster growth and fewer fires. In conventional agriculture and arable farming, we spray "everything" to death, we till the soil to "dead" (70% fewer earthworms) and with too much manure we acidify the soil to "dead". Things really need to change if we want to keep the sector afloat.
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 23 September 2023
Ask organic or sustainable growers what they do to protect their crops against, for example, phytophtora.
Subscriber
CM 23 September 2023
Gerben wrote:
We know from forestry that fungi work excellently with trees, especially in a varied tree population. This leads to better growth, a moister environment, less loss, faster growth and fewer fires. In conventional agriculture and arable farming, we spray "everything" to death, we till the soil to "dead" (70% fewer earthworms) and with too much manure we acidify the soil to "dead". Things really need to change if we want to keep the sector afloat.
Organic is certainly not the way. There is no market for that to begin with because 4% is already too much. Yields to feed the world are going completely wrong, so if you want a few billion deaths, fine, go ahead. Manure is a political choice in the Netherlands, I would like to use more to have good soil and yields with minimal fertilizer. And about that dead editing; Bio hoes and harrows itself with many edits. Nkg is the same. Spray less? By removing well-functioning products and seed treatments, we are forced to spray multiple times with less results. Phytophtora is the first fungal attack in the organic industry to cause crop destruction prematurely, resulting in small yields and a source of contamination for other growers.
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 23 September 2023
I sense a certain frustration because many rightly feel a bit let down by science and information about the best ways to use soil, plants and animals as best as possible. I agree that we do not yet have enough knowledge to be completely organic, but we do have enough knowledge to move towards Sustainable. Anyone who wants that and also with the speed to be able to do this. I often think of 2 statements that make a huge impression on me:
1 The structure of the soil comes in from above.
2. There is a great similarity between soil life and rumen flora because both need cellulose.

Subscriber
Freek 23 September 2023
Can it all be a little less!!!! Every year we squeeze 1 kg more milk from a cow per day. This extra kg of milk is fantastic for the concentrate manufacturer, but:
1. the costs are higher than the benefits.
2. cow has been written off before (is a bovine a thing?) Murder?!
3. relatively large amounts of ammonia and CO2 are released. A lot of water is needed.
4. More supply on the market; therefore even lower milk prices.

The farmer gets the short end of the stick; so the joke.
Subscriber
time bomb 24 September 2023
Frank wrote:
Can it all be a little less!!!! Every year we squeeze 1 kg more milk from a cow per day. This extra kg of milk is fantastic for the concentrate manufacturer, but:
1. the costs are higher than the benefits.
2. cow has been written off before (is a bovine a thing?) Murder?!
3. relatively large amounts of ammonia and CO2 are released. A lot of water is needed.
4. More supply on the market; therefore even lower milk prices.

The farmer gets the short end of the stick; so the joke.
What stupid talk again. As far as production is concerned, this is a matter of a good breeding program, so more feed is not necessary.
Early depreciation is possible, but not necessary. Murder?
Lots of ammonia. Nonsense. More milk per cow means fewer cows, so less concentrate. Look at beets, which used to be 60 tons ha, now 100 tons (can). This is also a matter of a good breeding program.
More offer? Don't you have any restrictions such as quota, manure sales, etc.?

A win-win situation. My day is good, I was able to teach you something, so I think you are happy too.

A good real farmer, livestock farmer, fruit grower, etc. will not be discouraged by your kind of people.

LUCTOR ET EMERGO, but we shouldn't bother with your nonsense, it's piece of cake.
flaming 25 September 2023
Louis Pascal de Geer wrote:
Ask organic or sustainable growers what they do to protect their crops against, for example, phytophtora.
They plant varieties that are less sensitive.
In years with high disease pressure they spray with heavy metals, on paper they end up as "foliar feed" on various crops, but in reality they all end up on the potatoes.
Subscriber
time bomb 25 September 2023
Also that. They still spray with copper as so-called foliar nutrition. How clumsy can the creators be.
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 25 September 2023
Yes, exactly and there are varieties that are less sensitive, do we know why?
The use of copper sulphate as protection against mold is very old.
Bordeau porridge, especially in fruit growing, if I remember correctly. What's rude about this?
In which hands is the research and plant breeding of potatoes? We all want to achieve that win-win!


Subscriber
CM 25 September 2023
Despite more robust varieties and frequent use of copper, it is not possible to keep the phytophthora out in a fungal year like the current one. Delaying at most a week or so before the crop needs to be roasted...also not environmentally friendly
friendlier by the way. Result small harvest and source of contamination for conventional growers. But hey, you say that people are doing so well... but not really!
Subscriber
CM 25 September 2023
Breeding to cross-breed resistance against phytophtora will not be possible for a very long time, especially with recurring variants. To think that this will be the solution is pie in the sky.
Subscriber
time bomb 25 September 2023
Let us not go astray. This forum is about N. It is more important than organic cultivation of potatoes, because without N we no longer have to grow potatoes.
Subscriber
4-leaf clover 25 September 2023
If I understand correctly, nitrogen for green manures will be finished by 2024. Livestock farming in the Netherlands can close its doors more quickly.
A few years later, arable farming has too low ox and P levels, long live WUR, where all these delusions arise.
Subscriber
Louis Pascal deGeer 25 September 2023
1. Get the impression, from science, that both the number of solar explosions and their intensity are increasing
2. The Ozone Layer must protect us against solar activity. How does that happen? A tempering barrier in which the O3 is active?
3. The ozone layer works against sun damage from top to bottom, but the ozone layer also seems to be called upon from bottom to top?
We are damaging the ozone layer
emitting harmful compounds of Nitrogen, Carbon and Methane?
Deforestation causes the release of harmful carbon compounds, industries also do this together with other harmful nitrogen compounds, etc.
On farmland and forests, carbon assimilation is active with sunlight and oxygen assimilation is active at night.
The leguminous plants in particular bind nitrogen from the air via Rhizobia bacteria
The farmers can only have a nitrogen problem if they want to, and fortunately these are very difficult to find. As Time Bomb says, back to the N file!


fer 25 September 2023
freek and gerben can you go on holiday forever??
because there isn't much useful information coming to you today.!
an arable farmer does not till his land to death or spray for fun.
He also does not fertilize too much simply because the government is the only obstacle to good fertilization that the plant needs.
which is not the case now, so we measure too little
so everything you write down is first class nonsense.
the average agricultural soil has a pH of 5/6 in the Netherlands, in the forest the soil is acidic and lime shells often have to be applied in nature....
and then you think you're lecturing a seasoned farmer
You can no longer respond.

What are the current quotations?

View and compare prices and rates yourself

News Nitrogen

KDW from law and emission targets instead of nitrogen targets

Opinions Wim Groot Koerkamp

Top-down meets bottom-up in nitrogen impasse

News Manure

Less nitrogen from manure, (still) above new ceiling

Opinions Jaap Major

Agriculture and nitrogen: problem or solution?

Call our customer service +0320(269)528

or mail to support@boerenbusiness.nl

do you want to follow us?

Receive our free Newsletter

Current market information in your inbox every day

Login/Register